대학생의 다전공 인식과 개선 및 요구사항 분석을 통한 향후 운영 방안 연구 = A Study on the Future Operation Plan through the Analysis of Multi-major Perception, Improvement and Requirements of University Students

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Objectives The purpose of this study is to present future strategies for the stable operation of a multi-major curriculum through the analysis of perceptions, improvements, and requirements related to multi-major.
Methods The subjects of the study were 1,218 students at A University, which has a multi-major system in Seoul, and the difference was verified with the SPSS 23.0 program. For 232 people who responded to open questions, morphology analysis was conducted using KoNLPy based on Google Colab and then frequency analysis and Wordcloud were conducted.
Results The main results are as follows. First, as a result of verifying the difference between multi-major perception and multi-major type classification, women were higher than men, and second, third and fourth graders were higher than first graders, and third and fourth graders were higher then second graders. In the case of the college, there was a statistically significant difference, but there was no statistically significant difference as a result of Scheffé's post-test. Second, as a result of verifying the difference between the preferred multi-majors, female students prefer double majors and male students prefer minor and convergence majors. There was no statistically significant difference in grades. College of humanities preferred double majors, engineering and IT colleges preferred minor majors, and IT preferred convergence majors. Third, as a result of verifying the difference in multi-major improvements, female students had high opinions on “adjustment of the number of selected people by department,” “expansion of division by subject,” and “opportunity to participate in special activities by department.”, and male students had high opinions on ‘strengthening academic support(professors, mentoring, teaching assistants). Compared to second, third, and fourth graders, first graders had a higher rate of “adjustment of the number of selected students by department,” “expansion of division by subject,” “strengthening academic support(professors, mentoring, teaching assistants),” and “opportunity to participate in special activities by department.” College of humanities had a high ratio of improvements in “adjustment of the number of selected people by department,” IT college “expansion of division by subject”, “strengthening academic support(professors, mentoring, teaching assistants).”, college of engineering “opportunity to participate in special activities by department.” Fourth, as a result of the morphology analysis of the requirements for multi-major operation, it was ranked first “major,” second “student,” third “credit,” fourth “subject,” and fifth “average.” Conclusions The results of this study are meaningful in that it provides basic data for establishing the direction of the multi-major curriculum. In addition, based on the results of this study, I would like to propose a way for multi-major customized operation in consideration of the characteristics of students.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 김훈호 ; 우한솔 ; 김한길 ; 김별희, "복수전공 이수가 첫 직장 취업성과에 미치는 영향: 4년제 일반대학 졸업생을 중심으로" 한국직업능력연구원 18 (18): 37-70, 2015
• 2 정현일 ; 류영진, "대학생의 부전공, 복수전공 만족도 결정요인에 관한 연구" 한국콘텐츠학회 19 (19): 111-119, 2019
• 3 한국교육개발원, "대학교육 혁신을 위한 정책 진단과방안(Ⅰ) : 대학 교육과정 혁신을 중심으로" 한국교육개발원 2017
• 4 행복한 교육, "대학(원)의 자율적 발전을 위한 학사제도 개선 추진 방향"
• 5 조혜영 ; 오세원, "대학 행정직원의 특성화 사업 인식이 재학생을 위한 진로탐색에 미치는 영향: 대학 특성화 정책에 대한 인식도, 만족도, 중요도의 매개효과" 한국산학기술학회 24 (24): 27-40, 2023
• 6 오세원 ; 조혜영, "대학 특성화 정책에 대한 행정직원의 인식도, 만족도, 중요도 분석" 학습자중심교과교육학회 23 (23): 123-145, 2023
• 7 이은혜, "다전공자의 특성과 노동시장 성과 분석" KRIVET 2015
• 8 권혜진, "다전공 이수 졸업생 분석을 통한 향후제도 운영 개선 방안 연구" 27 (27): 19-35, 2014
• 9 이희숙 ; 한재범, "다전공 선택 요인 및 다전공자 대학생활 실태 분석" 한국교육학회 60 (60): 295-319, 2022
• 10 Barnett, S. M., "When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer" 128 (128): 612-637, 2002
• 11 Grace, M. A., "The importance of creating curriculum and practices for the 21st century master of arts in communication: A program evalution" National Louis University Chicago 2020
• 12 Hemelt, S. W., "The college double major and subsequent earnings" 18 (18): 167-189, 2010
• 13 Partnership for 21st Century Skills, "The MILE Guide : Milestones for improving learning and education"
• 14 Paige, J., "The 21st century skills movement" 67 (67): 11-11, 2009
• 15 Katz, S. N., "Taking the true measure of a liberal education" Chronicle of Higher Education 2008
• 16 Bastedo, M., "Educational policies for integrating college competencies and workforce needs: Cases from Brazil, Mongolia, Ukraine, and the United States" Institute for Higher Education Policy 2009
• 17 Del Rossi, A., "Double your major, double your return?" 27 (27): 375-386, 2008
• 18 Russell, A. W., "Double degrees : Double the trouble or twice the return?" 55 (55): 575-591, 2008
• 19 Batson, C., "Combined courses of study : Equity group access and participation at the bachelor(honours/pass)level" Department of Education, Science and Training 2002
• 20 Shin, J., "Classifying higher education institution in Korea : A performance-based approach" 57 (57): 247-266, 2009
• 21 Jackson, D., "Business graduate employability : Where are we going wrong?" 32 : 776-790, 2013
• 22 Berrett, D., "Boston college, to refresh its aging curriculum, turns to design thinkers"
• 23 U. S. Department of Education, "A test of leadership:Charting the future of U.S. higher education"
• 24 Walker, M., "A human development and capabilities prospective analysis of global higher education policy" 25 (25): 485-501, 2010
• 25 Rotherham, A. J., "21st century skills : The challenges ahead" 67 (67): 16-21, 2009