杜亞泉과 陳獨秀 논쟁의 검토 = Study on Debate between Du yaquan and Chen duxiu

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This thesis examines the debate between Du yaquan, Editor-in-chief of 『Eastern Miscellany(東方雜誌)』 and Chen duxiu, leading figure in the New Culture Movement-. In Spetember of 1918, Chen raised suspicion and argued through the pages of 『New Youth(新靑年)』, that 『Eastern Miscellany』 is supporting the idea of revival of hereditary monarchy. Du countered this suspicion on 『Eastern Miscellany』 three months later. This exchange of arguments through the pages of their own magazine is often regarded as starting point of ‘East-West (Cultural) Debate’ in later studies.
In 1990s’, studies on Du yaquan began, From the early 1910s’, media activities of Du yaquan were mainly focused on political proposals. He was concentrating on how to establish constitutional politics in China. After the establishment of the Republic of China, Du focused on developing discussions on the relationship between individuals, society and state, during this process he often emphasized the importance of Chinnese civilization. On the other hand, one of the main activities of the New Culture Movement was a critique on Chinese civilization, especially Confucianism political ethics. Among them, Chen duxiu was the one who had the most severe criticism on effect of Confucianism ethics in republic of China.
Previous studies on this debate, mainly focused on how Du and Chen had differed in understanding of the Chinese civilization. In this thesis, by I pointed out that ‘debate’ between Du and Chen was not a result of their diffenrence in understanding of Chinese civilization, but it was rather Chen portraying Du as a person opposed to republican politics in order to emphasize the discussion he had argued through his journalism activities. In this process, Chen formed his argument by ignoring the context of Du’s media activity. Du was one who constantly supported the idea of settling republican politics in China. But in the debate, Du only pointed out the logical fallacies of Chen. In response to Du’s argument, Chen raised the question again and labelled Du as one who opposed republican politics. Image of Du yaquan, as an opposer of Chen duxiu and New culture movement was maintained for a quite long time.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 藤井隆, "｢調和｣論の帰結--杜亜泉の試み" 10 : 1996
• 2 연재흠, "중국 현대 문화보수주의의 문화관 연구 : 杜亞泉의 文化觀을 중심으로" 중앙철학연구소 50 : 39-71, 2018
• 3 이보고, "민국시기 문명론의 맥락에서 본 지방자치론" 한국중국현대문학학회 (63) : 29-60, 2012
• 4 이보고, "민국 초 담론권력의 변동과 『新靑年』 ― 『新靑年』 陳獨秀와 『東方雜誌』 杜亞泉 간의 논쟁을 사례로" 한국중국현대문학학회 (48) : 173-205, 2009
• 5 野村浩一, "近代中国の思想世界ー『新青年』の群像" 岩波書店 1990
• 6 若林正丈, "近代中国における総合雑誌--｢東方雑誌｣解題" 26 (26): 1978
• 7 畠山香織, "辜鴻銘の『中国人の精神』" 45 : 2012
• 8 川尻文彦, "辜鴻銘と｢道徳｣の課題－東西文明を俯瞰する視座" 2005
• 9 高力克, "調適的智慧 : 杜亜泉思想研究" 浙江人民出版社 1998
• 10 段書暁, "第一次世界大戦期の中国における列強の表象:1914年から1918年までの『東方雑誌』をめぐって" (３) : 2015
• 11 小野寺史郎, "欧州戦争と科学振興のジレンマ：中国における第一次世界大戦報道とその思想的影響" 75 (75): 2017
• 12 許紀霖, "杜亜泉文選" 華東師範大學出版社 1993
• 13 李先明, "新文化运动时期陈独秀“反孔非儒”的历史重探" (1) : 2018
• 14 王寄生, "新文化是如何運動起来的 ‐以新青年為視点" (157) : 2007
• 15 汪暉, "文化與政治的変奏 -戦争、革命與“一九一〇年代的思想戦”" (4) : 2009
• 16 洪九来, "寛容与理性:<<東方雑誌>>的公共輿論研究(1904-1932)" 上海人民出版社 2006
• 17 陳鬆, "五四前後東西文化問題論戰文選" 中國社會科學出版社 1989
• 18 周月峰, "中國近代思想家文庫 : 杜亞泉巻" 中國人民大學出版社 2014
• 19 許紀霖, "一溪集 : 杜亜泉的生平與思想" 三聯書店 1999
• 20 차태근, "『東方雜誌』의 담론정치와 신해혁명" 한국중국현대문학학회 (59) : 1-32, 2011
• 21 陶海洋, "『東方雑誌』研究(1904-1948)" 合肥工業大学出版社 2014
• 22 Fung, S. K. Edmund, "The Intellectual Foundations of Chinese Modernity: Cultural and Political Thought in the Republican Era" Cambridge University Press 2010
• 23 Huters, Theodore, "Bringing the World Home: Appropriating the West in Late Qing and Early Republican China" University of Hawai'i Press 2005
• 24 차태근, "5·4운동 시기 문명 전환론과 사회주의" 한국중국현대문학학회 (53) : 27-62, 2010
• 25 鄭大華, "20世紀90年代以來五四東西文化論戰研究述評" 5 (5): 2006