무수익여신 상승률의 결정요인과 실물 경제로의 전달 효과 = Determinants and Impact on Macroeconomic Performance of Non-Performing Loans Growth

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 최근 연구 동향을 반영하여 국내 은행의 무수익여신(NPL) 상승률의 결정요인에 대한 연구를 수행하였다. 본 연구는 NPL의 상승률에 관한 거시변수 가설과 은행변수 가설을 2단계 실증절차를 사용하여 순차적으로 분석하였다. 그리고 패널 VAR 모형을 사용하여 NPL의 영향이 실물 경제로 이어지는 전달 효과를 분석하였다. 본 연구의 표본은 2000년부터 2016년까지 164개 일반은행과 저축은행의 반기 관측치이다. 패널 VAR 모형을 바탕으로 직교화된 충격반응함수를 측정한 결과, 은행 시스템에서 발생한 충격이 약 1년 동안 실물 경제에 부정적 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 이것은 개별은행이 NPL을 효과적으로 관리하는 것이 거시경제적으로 긍정적인 영향을 미친다는 것을 의미한다. 또한, 물가 경로와 이자율 경로에서 전달 효과가 뚜렷했는데, 이는 통화 정책을 수행할 때 실물 경제의 부담을 경감하기 위해 먼저 은행 시스템을 점검해야 함을 시사한다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper examines the determinants of non-performing loans (hereafter NPLs) in the perspective of the macroeconomic and bank-level variables. Our contributions to the literature are in three folds. First, we employ the fixed effect model controlling for bank-level heterogeneity and the dynamic panel model controlling for autocorrelation to examine the determinants of NPLs growth in the Korean banking sector. On top of that, we extend the sample to commercial banks and savings banks. Including savings bank is crucial since those banks were distressed during the sample periods. Third, this paper analyzes the feedback effects of the banking sector on the real economy using panel vector autoregressive model.
The results show that, among other macroeconomic factors, ‘growth rate of GDP’, ‘growth rate of KOSPI’, ‘growth rate of HPI’, ‘inflation’, ‘risk-free rate’, ‘corporate sector leverage’, ‘government spending-to-taxes’, ‘non-financial sector credit-to-GDP’, and ‘growth of nominal exchange rate’ support the macroeconomic hypotheses. For the bank-level hypotheses, it was found that 1) ‘non-interest expenses-to-total assets’ and ‘total expenses-to-total income’ satisfy the skimping hypothesis, 2) ‘bank size in log’ satisfies the too-big-to-fail hypothesis, 3) ‘liquid assets-to-total deposits’ satisfy the liquidity hypothesis, and 4) ‘total loans-to-total assets’, ‘total loans-to-total deposits’, and ‘interest income-to-total loans’ satisfy the lending supply hypothesis.
Furthermore, as for the impact of the banking sector on the real economy, a simultaneous negative relationship was found between bank's NPLs and GDP. The causal relationship between the NPLs and GDP, on the other hand, was only found in the inflation and credit channels. According to the impulse response functions estimated, shocks in the banking sector result in negative consequences of the real economy for about one year. This implies that there exists the positive macroeconomic effect if individual banks effectively manage their NPLs.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 구재운, "주거래은행의 재무상태가 기업투자에 미치는 효과" 한국산업경제학회 25 (25): 2147-2168, 2012
• 2 김상헌, "자기자본비율의 상향조정 유인이 은행의 후순위채 발행에 미치는 영향" 한국경영교육학회 (62) : 1-20, 2010
• 3 이은서, "은행의 무수익여신 결정요인" 한국경영교육학회 28 (28): 487-507, 2013
• 4 이석영, "은행산업의 효율성 영향요인 분석" 대한회계학회 17 (17): 249-276, 2012
• 5 변현수, "국내은행의 부실여신 결정요인과 실물경제에 미치는 영향" (732) : 3-36, 2016
• 6 Keeton, W.R., "Why do banks' loan losses differ?" 72 (72): 1987
• 7 Rajan, R. G., "Why bank credit policies fluctuate: A theory and some evidence" 109 (109): 399-441, 1994
• 8 Choi, I., "Unit root tests for panel data" 20 (20): 249-272, 2001
• 9 Levin, A., "Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties" 108 (108): 1-24, 2002
• 10 Stern, G. H., "Too big to fail: The hazards of bank bailouts" Brookings Institution Press 2004
• 11 Festić, M., "The macroeconomic sources of systemic risk in the banking sectors of five new EU member states" 35 (35): 310-322, 2011
• 12 Geanakoplos, J., "The leverage cycle" 24 (24): 1-66, 2010
• 13 Sargan, J. D., "The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables" 26 : 393-415, 1958
• 14 O'Connell, P. G., "The Overvaluation of Purchasing Power Parity" 44 (44): 1-19, 1998
• 15 Sorge, M., "Stress-testing financial systems: an overview of current methodologies" 2004
• 16 Martinez Peria, M., "Stress testing of financial systems: an overview of issues, methodologies, and FSAP experiences" 2001
• 17 Granger, C.W., "Spurious regressions in econometrics" 2 (2): 111-120, 1974
• 18 Arellano, M., "Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations" 58 (58): 277-297, 1991
• 19 Berger, A.N., "Problem loans and cost efficiency in commercial banks" 21 (21): 849-870, 1997
• 20 Espinoza, R.A., "Nonperforming loans in the GCC banking system and their macroeconomic effects" 2010
• 21 Fofack, H., "Nonperforming loans in Sub-Saharan Africa: causal analysis and macroeconomic implications" 2005
• 22 Klein, N., "Non-performing loans in CESEE: Determinants and impact on macroeconomic performance" 2013
• 23 Rajan, R., "Non-performing loans and terms of credit of public sector banks in India: An empirical assessment" 24 (24): 81-121, 2003
• 24 Bholat, D. M., "Non-performing loans : regulatory and accounting treatments of assets" 2016
• 25 Louzis, D. P., "Macroeconomic and bank-specific determinants of non-performing loans in Greece: A comparative study of mortgage, business and consumer loan portfolios" 36 (36): 1012-1027, 2012
• 26 Hansen, L. P., "Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators" 50 (50): 1029-1054, 1982
• 27 Beck, R., "Key determinants of non-performing loans : new evidence from a global sample" 26 (26): 525-550, 2015
• 28 Marcucci, J., "Is Bank Portfolio Riskiness Procyclical?: Evidence from Italy Using a Vector Autoregression" 18 (18): 46-63, 2008
• 29 Granger, C. W., "Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods" 37 (37): 424-438, 1969
• 30 Blundell, R., "Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models" 87 (87): 115-143, 1998
• 31 Roodman, D., "How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata" 2006
• 32 Reinhart, C.M., "From financial crash to debt crisis" 101 (101): 1676-1706, 2011
• 33 Anderson, T.W., "Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data" 18 (18): 47-82, 1982
• 34 Holtz-Eakin, D., "Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data" 56 (56): 1371-1395, 1988
• 35 Us, V., "Dynamics of non-performing loans in the Turkish banking sector by an ownership breakdown: The impact of the global crisis" 20 : 109-117, 2017
• 36 Keeton, W. R., "Does faster loan growth lead to higher loan losses?" 84 (84): 1999
• 37 Dickey, D.A., "Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root" 74 : 427-431, 1979
• 38 Williams, J., "Determining management behaviour in European banking" 28 (28): 2427-2460, 2004
• 39 Škarica, B., "Determinants of non-performing loans in Central and Eastern European countries" 38 (38): 37-59, 2014
• 40 Diwan, I., "Debt reduction, adjustment lending, and burden sharing" 1992
• 41 Salas, V., "Credit risk in two institutional regimes: Spanish commercial and savings banks" 22 (22): 203-224, 2002
• 42 Chaibi, H., "Credit risk determinants: Evidence from a cross-country study" 33 : 1-16, 2015
• 43 Ghosh, A., "Banking-industry specific and regional economic determinants of non-performing loans: Evidence from US states" 20 : 93-104, 2015
• 44 Çifter, A., "Bank concentration and non-performing loans in Central and Eastern European countries" 16 (16): 117-137, 2015
• 45 Ruckes, M., "Bank competition and credit standards" 17 (17): 1073-1102, 2004
• 46 De Bock, R., "Bank Asset Quality in Emerging Markets; Determinants and Spillovers" 2012
• 47 Podpiera, J., "Bad luck or bad management? Emerging banking market experience" 4 (4): 135-148, 2008
• 48 Arellano, M., "Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models" 68 (68): 29-51, 1995
• 49 Wold, H., "A study in the analysis of stationary time series" 1938