KCI등재
高麗前期의 曆日 = The Calender of the Early Goryeo
저자
장동익 (경북대학교)
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2012
작성언어
Korean
주제어
KDC
900
등재정보
KCI등재
자료형태
학술저널
발행기관 URL
수록면
165-203(39쪽)
KCI 피인용횟수
16
제공처
Since the Five Dynasties(五代), Goryeo established diplomatic relations with China and then produced the independent Goryeo Calendar under the influence of calendar of China. Goryeo used Seonmeongryeok(宣明曆) that used the previous dynasty after early days, but they established the independent era name. For this reason, they wanted to make suitable calendar for this situation. The calendar synthesized the calendars of China(宋·南宋) and the northern races(遼·金). It may be inferred from these data that Goryeo was reflected the contents in their own calendar when China and the northern races changed it.
Also it changed several times in the China. Therefore, the description of History of Goryeo that Goryeo used Seonmeongryeok as it is during 400 years was wrong. Goryeo used the independent Calendar based on Seonmeongryeok. It supposed that timely was revised it through the law of the astronomical station based on Gujipryeok(九執曆). Also it received with reference to Geonheungryeok(乾興曆)·Bongwonryeok(奉元曆) from Sung since then. As a result, the leap month, the 24 seasonal divisions and the size of month of it were the delicate nuance with the calendars of Sung, Kitan and Japan. But both were just alike.
So, it is understandable that there is not much difference between the calendar of the early days of Goryeo and the calendar of Sung except ⓐ1028(Hyeonjong, 19) that the officer badly organized to the leap year and leap month and ⓑ1067(Munjong, 21) that was different from Bongwonryeok. Also, it was affected by calendars of various kind of Sung, so it was different from the calendar of Japan based on Seonmeongryeok to the leap month.
It compared the date that inscribed with the zodiac signs in a chronicle and an epigraph and the date that inscribed with the decimal system with the calendar of Sung to verify this hypothesis. As a result, it mostly concurred with the hypothesis except only seven cases among the examples.
For this reason, though the independent Calendar of Goryeo was affected by the Yuan Empire from the second half of the 13th century, it used continuedly. The last time that showed the difference between the calendar of Goryeo and Sung was on September, 1300(King Chungyeol, 26). Because the Calendar of Goryeo was affected by Georgius(闊里吉思) who sent to intervention in the internal affairs. Consequentially, Goryeo was used to the calendar of Yuan from 1301 and then the calendars of Goryeo and Sung would have been the same calendar.
Since the Five Dynasties(五代), Goryeo established diplomatic relations with China and then produced the independent Goryeo Calendar under the influence of calendar of China. Goryeo used Seonmeongryeok(宣明曆) that used the previous dynasty after early days, but they established the independent era name. For this reason, they wanted to make suitable calendar for this situation. The calendar synthesized the calendars of China(宋·南宋) and the northern races(遼·金). It may be inferred from these data that Goryeo was reflected the contents in their own calendar when China and the northern races changed it.
Also it changed several times in the China. Therefore, the description of History of Goryeo that Goryeo used Seonmeongryeok as it is during 400 years was wrong. Goryeo used the independent Calendar based on Seonmeongryeok. It supposed that timely was revised it through the law of the astronomical station based on Gujipryeok(九執曆). Also it received with reference to Geonheungryeok(乾興曆)·Bongwonryeok(奉元曆) from Sung since then. As a result, the leap month, the 24 seasonal divisions and the size of month of it were the delicate nuance with the calendars of Sung, Kitan and Japan. But both were just alike.
So, it is understandable that there is not much difference between the calendar of the early days of Goryeo and the calendar of Sung except ⓐ1028(Hyeonjong, 19) that the officer badly organized to the leap year and leap month and ⓑ1067(Munjong, 21) that was different from Bongwonryeok. Also, it was affected by calendars of various kind of Sung, so it was different from the calendar of Japan based on Seonmeongryeok to the leap month.
It compared the date that inscribed with the zodiac signs in a chronicle and an epigraph and the date that inscribed with the decimal system with the calendar of Sung to verify this hypothesis. As a result, it mostly concurred with the hypothesis except only seven cases among the examples.
For this reason, though the independent Calendar of Goryeo was affected by the Yuan Empire from the second half of the 13th century, it used continuedly. The last time that showed the difference between the calendar of Goryeo and Sung was on September, 1300(King Chungyeol, 26). Because the Calendar of Goryeo was affected by Georgius(闊里吉思) who sent to intervention in the internal affairs. Consequentially, Goryeo was used to the calendar of Yuan from 1301 and then the calendars of Goryeo and Sung would have been the same calendar.
분석정보
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2027 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2021-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | KCI등재 |
2018-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | KCI등재 |
2015-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | KCI등재 |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | KCI등재 |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | KCI등재 |
2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | KCI등재 |
2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | KCI후보 |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) | KCI후보 |
2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | KCI후보 |
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.81 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.78 | 0.81 | 1.498 | 0.27 |
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)