1910년대 일제의 조선 동화론과 동화정책 = The Discourse and the Policy of Assimilating Koreans by The Chosun Sotokufu in 1910s

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

It was around 1904, after they have won Russo-Japanese War that the Japanese began to talk about assimilating and civilizing Korea. Even though they admitted they had learned the high civilization of China through Korea in the ancient age, they said Korea has degenerated ever since into barbarism. So they proclaimed it their duty to vibrate Korea. Referring to the mission of civilization, almost all of the leaders of Japan urged their people and their government to take bold steps to go to Korea and save poor Koreans from barbarism.
On proclaiming the eternal merge of Korea to Imperial Japan, they justified it as a reunification of two families and said by it Koreans become the same infants and subjects of the Japanese Emperor as the Japanese. But contradicting their benevolent proclamation, they permitted Korea only the status of an ‘external territory’(外地), outcasting Koreans out of the wall of protect of the Japanese constitution.
The Chosun Sotokufu ascribed this outright discrimination to the low level of development of the people and the difficult situations in Korea(時勢民度), they urged Koreans to obey to civilizing policies of the ‘government’ and follow the guidance of Japanese brother. They asserted that only when Koreans arrived at the same level of civilization and fully assimilated to Japan, could they be treated as the same, urging Koreans to learn Japanese language as the first step.
But partly being aware of the strong antipathy of the Koreans toward the policy of assimilation and partly because their shortage of fiscal ability to put it forward, the Chosun Sotokufu could not drive the policy of assimilation strong in 1910s. So we could conclude that the Japanese claiming of assimilating Koreans in 1910s not so much a real policy as it is a propaganda offensive and a excuse to discrminate against Koreans.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

It was around 1904, after they have won Russo-Japanese War that the Japanese began to talk about assimilating and civilizing Korea. Even though they admitted they had learned the high civilization of China through Korea in the ancient age, they said Korea has degenerated ever since into barbarism. So they proclaimed it their duty to vibrate Korea. Referring to the mission of civilization, almost all of the leaders of Japan urged their people and their government to take bold steps to go to Korea and save poor Koreans from barbarism.
On proclaiming the eternal merge of Korea to Imperial Japan, they justified it as a reunification of two families and said by it Koreans become the same infants and subjects of the Japanese Emperor as the Japanese. But contradicting their benevolent proclamation, they permitted Korea only the status of an ‘external territory’(外地), outcasting Koreans out of the wall of protect of the Japanese constitution.
The Chosun Sotokufu ascribed this outright discrimination to the low level of development of the people and the difficult situations in Korea(時勢民度), they urged Koreans to obey to civilizing policies of the ‘government’ and follow the guidance of Japanese brother. They asserted that only when Koreans arrived at the same level of civilization and fully assimilated to Japan, could they be treated as the same, urging Koreans to learn Japanese language as the first step.
But partly being aware of the strong antipathy of the Koreans toward the policy of assimilation and partly because their shortage of fiscal ability to put it forward, the Chosun Sotokufu could not drive the policy of assimilation strong in 1910s. So we could conclude that the Japanese claiming of assimilating Koreans in 1910s not so much a real policy as it is a propaganda offensive and a excuse to discrminate against Koreans.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 純宗, "｢詔勅｣ 號外(1910.8.29)"
• 2 酒井哲哉, "｢植民政策學｣から ｢國際關係論｣へ - 戰間期日本の國際秩序論をめぐる一考察, in:植民地帝國日本の法的展開" 信山社 8-9, 2004
• 3 陳培豊, "｢同化｣の同床異夢" 三元社 24-, 2001
• 4 최혜주, "한말 일제하 釋尾旭邦의 내한활동과 조선인식" 한국민족운동사학회 45 : 5-56, 2005
• 5 윤건차, "한국근대 교육의 사상과 운동" 靑史 1987
• 6 이지원, "한국 근대 문화사상사 연구" 혜안 88-97, 2007
• 7 박양신, "통감정치와 재한 일본인" 역사교육연구회 (90) : 155-179, 2004
• 8 李榮昊, "통감부시기 조세증가정책의 실현과정과 그 성격" 18 : 348-, 1996
• 9 권태억, "통감부 설치기 일제의 조선 근대화론" (53) : 1994
• 10 "조선총독부월보"
• 11 정연태, "조선총독 데라우치(寺內正毅)의 한국관과 식민통치: 점진적 민족동화론과 민족차별 폭압정책의 이중성, in: 한국 근대사회와 문화 2" 서울대 출판부 90-91, 2005
• 12 김동노, "일본제국주의의 조선지배의 특징, in:일제 식민지 시기의 통치체제 형성"
• 13 保坂祐二, "일본제국주의의 민족동화정책 분석: 조선과 만주, 대만을 중심으로" 고려대학교 1999
• 14 신주백, "일본의 ‘동화’정책과 지배전략: 통치기구 및 학교교육과의 관계를 중심으로, in: 일본과 서구의 식민통치 비교" 선인 2004
• 15 藤原彰, "일본군사사" 시사일본어사사 123-124, 1994
• 16 宮島博史, "일본 ‘국사’의 성립과 한국사에 대한 인식: 봉건제에 대한 논의를 중심으로, in: 근대교류사와 상호인식1" 고려대학교 아세아문제 연구소 443-, 2001
• 17 오성철, "식민지 초등 교육의 형성" 교육과학사 2000
• 18 森山茂德, "명치기(明治期) 일본 지도자들의 한국인식 in: 근대교류사와 상호인식 1" 고려대학교 아세아문제 연구소 389-, 2001
• 19 함동주, "러일전쟁 후 일본의 한국식민론과 식민주의적 문명론" 동양사학회 (94) : 177-203, 2006
• 20 권태억, "동화정책론" 172 : 2001
• 21 "공립보통학교 교원 강습회원에 대한 총독의 훈시" (252) : 29-, 1913
• 22 이성시, "黑板勝美(구로이타 가쯔미)를 통해 본 식민지와 역사학" 23 : 246-, 1999
• 23 岡田良平, "韓國敎育論" 11 (11): 1905
• 24 "韓國保護の要義を論する" 29-30, 1908
• 25 幣原坦, "韓國の敎育" 5 (5): 1906
• 26 釋尾旭邦, "韓人は如何に日本を見るか" 1 (1): 1908
• 27 寺內正毅, "道長官に對する總督の訓示" (245) : 237-238, 1913
• 28 淸川雪彦, "近代日本の植民地政策-‘市場圈’の視點から同化主義政策を考える, in:歷史のなかの開發" 岩波講座 開發と文化 245-, 1997
• 29 近代アジア敎育史硏究會, "近代日本のアジア敎育認識.資料篇" 龍溪書舍
• 30 "資料 雜誌にみる近代日本の朝鮮認識" 綠蔭書房 1999
• 31 "舊韓國官報" 亞細亞文化社 1112-, 1974
• 32 釋尾旭邦, "總督政治の方針を論ず" (32) : 1910
• 33 春山明哲, "第1篇 近代日本の植民地統治と原敬, in:日本植民地主義の政治的展開 1895~1934: その統治體制と臺灣の民族運動" 41-, 1980
• 34 "每日申報"
• 35 谷壽夫, "機密 日露戰史" 原書房 557-, 1966
• 36 久保田優子, "植民地朝鮮の日本語敎育-日本語による ｢同化｣敎育の成立過程" 九州大學出判會 2005
• 37 駒入武, "植民地帝國日本の文化統合" 岩波書店 89-, 1996
• 38 마크 피티, "植民地- 帝國五十年の興亡" 讀賣新聞社 134-, 1996
• 39 小田省吾, "朝鮮總督府編纂敎科書槪要" 1917
• 40 "朝鮮總督府統計年報(明治44년도)" 朝鮮總督府 1912
• 41 寺內正毅, "朝鮮總督府施政年報" 朝鮮總督府 1912
• 42 寺內正毅, "朝鮮統治三年間成績" 朝鮮總督府 10-, 1914
• 43 井上雅二, "朝鮮統治の根本方針, in:新朝鮮" 朝鮮硏究會 102-103, 1916
• 44 宮田節子, "朝鮮民衆과 ｢皇民化｣政策" 일조각 1997
• 45 水野直樹, "朝鮮植民地支配と名前の｢差異化｣: ｢內地人ニ紛ハシキ姓名｣の禁止おめぐて, in:植民地主義と人類學" 2001
• 46 幣原坦, "朝鮮敎育論" 56-, 1919
• 47 "朝鮮敎育要覽" 1919
• 48 "朝鮮彙報"
• 49 "朝鮮半島史の編纂要旨及順序" 1916
• 50 關屋貞三郞, "朝鮮人敎育に就きて" 45 : 7-9, 1919
• 51 弓削幸太郞, "朝鮮の敎育" 1923
• 52 藤村道生, "日韓議定書の成立過程 - 大三輪長兵衛 韓國關係文書 『諸事抄錄』, 『渡韓始末錄』の史料解說として" 61 : 208-, 1971
• 53 大石嘉一郞, "日本帝國主義史 1(1次大戰期)" 東大出版會 51-54, 1985
• 54 金洛年, "日本帝國主義下の朝鮮經濟" 東京大學出版會 56-, 2002
• 55 일본외무성편찬, "日本外交年表竝主要文書 상" 224-228, 1965
• 56 "日本史大事典"
• 57 張錫興, "日帝의 植民地 言論政策과 總督府機關紙 『每日申報』의 性格, in:한국독립운동사연구" 421-, 1992
• 58 정재철, "日帝의 對韓國植民地敎育政策史" 一志社 1985
• 59 金正仁, "日帝强占期 天道敎團의 民族運動 연구" 서울대학교 2002
• 60 朝鮮總督府, "施政二十五年史" 1935
• 61 渡部學, "敎化意見書 in: 日本植民地敎育政策資料集成 69" 1910
• 62 山縣有朋, "戰後經營意見書, in:山縣有朋意見書"
• 63 마크 이 카프리오, "想像の植民地共同體-日本人がつくった朝鮮と朝鮮民族の肖像" 日本植民地硏究會 (11) : 40-, 1999
• 64 水野直樹, "序論- 日本の植民地主義を考える, in:生活の中の植民地主義" 人文書院 16-, 2004
• 65 "帝國議會衆議院議事速記錄 2" 太山출판사 169-178, 1991
• 66 美濃部達吉, "帝國憲法は新領土に行はるるや否や" 25 (25): 97-, 1911
• 67 "岩波講座 近代日本と植民地" 統合と支配の論理 1993
• 68 南多平, "岡山縣韓國農業獎勵組合設立の經過及其事業(1)" 3 (3): 18-, 1909
• 69 東村岳史, "對アイヌ民族政策において ｢同化｣のレトリック" 名古屋大學大學院國際開發硏究科 (8) : 2-, 1997
• 70 "大詔煥發と滿韓在留帝國臣民" 40 : 1908
• 71 山崎丹照, "外地統治機構の硏究" 高山書院 1-, 1943
• 72 陳培豊, "同化 の 同床異夢" 28-, 2001
• 73 山本四郞, "合倂後半島統治ト帝國憲法トノ關係, in: 寺內正毅關係文書(首相以前)" 63-, 1984
• 74 "各道長官に對する訓示 in: 朝鮮統治三年間成績" 1913
• 75 花田金之助, "內鮮人의 融和와 敎育" 42 : 45-46, 1919
• 76 "京城府史 2권" 888-899,
• 77 マーク.R.ピーテイ, "ミクロネシアにおける日本の同化政策, in:帝國という幻想-大東亞共榮圈｣の思想と現實" 靑木書店 1998
• 78 高木博志, "アイヌ民族への同化政策の成立, in:國民國家を問う" 靑木社 1994
• 79 E.Patricia Tsurumi, "Japanese Education in Taiwan, 1895~1945"
• 80 朴羊信, "19세기 말 일본인의 조선여행기에 나타난 조선상" 역사학회 177 (177): 105-130, 2003
• 81 김태웅, "1915년 京城府 物産共進會와 日帝의 政治宣傳" 서울학연구소 18 (18): 139-168, 2002
• 82 권태억, "1910년대 조선총독부의 조선인식과 통치방식-문명화론을 중심으로" 2008
• 83 정상우, "1910년대 일제의 지배논리와 지식인층의 인식: ‘日鮮同祖論’과 ‘文明化論’을 중심으로" 서울대학교 인문대학 국사학과 (46) : 2001
• 84 江口圭一, "1910~30年代の日本-アジア支配への途, in:岩波講座 『日本通史』 18권 근대 3" 18 : 19-, 1994
• 85 권태억, "1904~1910년 일제의 한국침략 구상과 ‘施政改善’" (31) : 1994