해고의 개념에 대한 미시적 분석

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Dismissal is the most controversial in labor law, but research of the concept dismissed is not comprehensive,because the reasons for dismissal is from the specific point of view and how the environment is, in case the attitude and position on judgments based on very careful study of the way, Because this study is from our judgments and dismissal from the academic system and method as well as instructions on definitions is not fully reflected. For these reasons make a lots of fire systems and research in the interpretation becomes more difficult. Dismissal of the concepts and systems has to be sort out, Because for notice of termination, and the disappearance of the working relationship,dismiss of the concept have to be more explicit in the legislation. The meaning of dismissal is a very broad concept, Because of its use, so that legal problems gradually reduced. For these reasons the relationship between dismissal notice and working disappearance of the distinction become more necessary and precise to use the law. Opposite point of view, dismissal of the notification system is a concept from the dismissal, when intention to stop work and terminate the working relationship, and inform the work stops. For example look at the vehicle rental contract, in one of the parties to lift the vehicle lease relations, must be informed against the other three months ago. At this point you can see not just dismiss the notification system is used in the working relationship.If essentially of the dismissal is seen as the termination of work, it is necessary to distinguish between the dismissal system and punishment system. Because the system of dismissal is termination to continue the contract for the purpose.the right determine of dismissal and its relevance, is to amend dismiss the mistakes before the judgment. Legal concepts and theoretical nature of their interpretation and application is consistent reflect. From these viewpoints, in the labor practices and research, the nature of dismissal is needs further observation.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 문제의 소재
• Ⅱ. 해고제도의 노동법 체계상 지위와 의의
• Ⅲ. 해고의 개념 요소에 대한 미시적 검토
• Ⅳ. ‘해지’로서의 해고가 갖는 개념속성과 해고정당성 판단 방식 재검토
• Ⅴ. 결론
• 참고문헌
• 〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 사법연수원, "해고와 임금" 2008
• 2 하경효, "해고예고규정위반과 단체협약에 따른 노조와의 합의 없이 행한 징계면직의 효력" 경영계 1994
• 3 강희원, "해고법체계를 위하여" 8 : 2000
• 4 권혁, "해고, 해고사유, 해고동기" 한국노동법학회 (22) : 281-283, 2006
• 5 권혁, "해고 유형론에 관한 소고" 법학연구소 51 (51): 713-735, 2010
• 6 박지순, "징계제도의 법적 구조 및 개별쟁점의 재검토" (1) : 2008
• 7 정진경, "부당해고와 형사처벌" 서울대학교노동법연구회 (24) : 221-256, 2008
• 8 곽윤직, "민법총칙" 박영사 2007
• 9 임종률, "노동법" 박영사 2009
• 10 김형배, "노동법" 박영사 2011
• 11 이상윤, "노동법" 2011
• 12 권혁, "근로기준법상 해고예고제도와 민법상 해지기간제도와의 관계" 한국경영법률학회 17 (17): 793-819, 2006
• 13 권혁, "근로기준법상 해고예고제도와 민법상 해지기간제도와의 관계" 한국경영법률학회 17 (17): 793-819, 2006
• 14 하갑래, "근로기준법" 2011
• 15 金紹英, "解雇事由에 관한 연구" 高麗大學校 大學院 1992
• 16 西村信雄, "解雇" 5 : 1961
• 17 Stahlhacke, "Kündigung und Kündigungsschutz im Arbeitsverhältnis" 2002
• 18 Adomeit, "Kündigung und Kündigungsschutz im Arbeitsverhältnis" 1962