KCI우수등재
몽골제국 시기 티베트의 역참 운용 연구 = Transporting Monks and Offerings for the Khan — The Postal System in Tibet during the Sakya-Mongol Period —
저자
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2022
작성언어
Korean
주제어
등재정보
KCI우수등재
자료형태
학술저널
발행기관 URL
수록면
171-209(39쪽)
DOI식별코드
제공처
소장기관
The Mongol Empire subjugated most of Eurasia in the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries. Tibet was also under the control of the Mongols and the Sakyapa became the ruler of Tibet with the support of the Mongols. However, it is not well known how the Mongol government ruled Tibet. It is also not clear what the Sakyapa did and what kind of levies the Mongol government imposed on the Tibetan people. This is due to the lack of Tibetan records on worldly affairs, which is the common practice in Tibetan writings. Furthermore, the Chinese sources are also reticent about Tibetan affairs during this period. Therefore, it is interesting that a lot of Chinese records on the postal system, the jam(Ch.站), mention about Tibetan monks. These records repeatedly criticized the extremely large number of Tibetan monks invited to Dadu by the Mongol ruling class. They were using post horses lavishly and thus, brought about the breakdown of the Mongol postal system in China.
From the fact that postal households in the Chinese area suffered from compulsory service for the monks from Tibet to Dadu and vice versa, we can deduce that the situation of the Tibetan postal stations might have been the same. What is more important is that because the Tibetan population was small, but the dominions was vast, the situation was worse than in China. We see records that Tibetan postal households became so impoverished that they could not redeem their postal duty. Most of Tibetan condemnations against the Mongols and the Sakyapa regime made mention of the ulag (’u lag, postal horses or postal labor).
As is well known, the Mongol government established thirteen myriarchies in Tibet. What is interesting is that the Archives from China and Tibet which the Wise like: Mirror Illuminating the World (Rgya bod kyi yig tshang mkhas pas dga’ byed chen mo ‘dzam bu gling gsal ba’i me long) in 15th century recorded that several myriarchies in Tibet worked solely for the postal stations. In addition, there were two kinds of postal stations in Tibet: one is large station('jam chen), the other is small station('jam chung).
The biggest problem was that when the monks came back to Tibet, they had enormous amounts of offerings by the Mongol ruling class. For example, in 1270, when Khubilai was initiated from Lama Phagpa, he offered one thousand ding (Ch. 錠) of silver and fifty-nine thousand rolls of silk to Phagpa. Since Phagpa, lots of Tibetan monks were invited to the Mongol court and returned to Tibet with huge offerings from the Mongols and they wanted to carry the offerings to Tibet on the postal horses. Several records mention that some Tibetan monks were found guilty of overloading postal horses with the huge offerings on their way home but absolved soon by the order of the Khan.
The facts that an absolute majority of Tibetan households worked for the postal system and ulag was considered as one of the heaviest burdens imposed by the Mongols show that the maintenance of the postal stations was the most critical duty for the Tibetan people. In addition, it is also noteworthy that the number of households in charge of each of large station ('jam chen) is set at almost 3,000. In some cases, the number of households in the individual myriarchy itself was 3,000, all of whom were entrusted with postal stations. But even when several myriarchies were collected and entrusted with one large station, the Mongols and the Sakya regime also set the number of the households to be in charge of one large postal station at 3,000. Through this, we can say that Mongolian and Sakya regimes saw it appropriate that 3,000 Tibetan households had jurisdiction over one large stations.
Then, who had jurisdiction on the Tibetan postal system? It was Khubilai’s high official who came to Tibet and decided the locations of Tibetan post stations and the Mongol court in Dadu sent alms to Central Tibet when the postal households fell into poverty. However, the pönchen (lay governor) o...
분석정보
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)