헌법명제로서 살림의 패러다임과 경제와 재정의 지속가능성 -녹색성장 개념의 외연확장과 심화를 위하여- = The Paradigm of Sallim as a Constitutional Theorem and the Sustainability of Economy and Public Finance -For the Extension and Intensification of the Concept of Green Growth-

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This essay, with the special attention to the relation between environment and politics, economy, and society, andexplores the needs and ways in which the new paradigm of ``sallim`` (eco: oikos in Greek) shapes politico-economic discourse in the context of the sustainability of economy and public finance as the constitutional theorem. But my aim here is not to propose changes of the concrete economic, financial policy but to suggest change in the viewpoints and the ways we think about the policy including decision-making system. In this context, I begin by posing deeper questions: Why do we need the new paradigm: the ``New Humanism``? What is the spirit and the philosophical basis there? My analysis begins with a definition of the sustainability in the context of the ``sallim paradigm`` based on the spirit of co-life and a review of conflicting views about the nature of human-being, purpose and meaning of living, and happiness. I suggest that we should pioneer the right route to ``the great compromise`` and that we can get the only one available chance and means from the ``amalgamation`` of ideologies, viewpoints, and systems and so on. As a conclusion in the realm of economy, I propose the reason and ways of the concrete reflection and transformation from the traditional ``Orthodox Economics`` to the ``Heterodox Economics`` toward the sustainability of economics: ``the new good economics`` which could be juxtaposed on the new philosophical basis of ecology and the ``New Humanism``. And, from the viewpoint of the public financial sustainability, I suggest the appropriateness and the necessity of a public financial reform for limiting of national debt. In conclusion, I attempt to argue that the available means and the critical clues for the effective discourse could be found from the Constitution which is itself a basic law of the political economy originated from the political, social compromise between the conflicting groups and oriented to the harmony between the present and the future generations.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 홍준형, "환경법의 기본원리로서 지속가능한 개발의 원칙" 25 (25): 1997
• 2 조영일, "환경경제의 이해 - 환경경제학입문" 금문서적 1998
• 3 이영철, "확실성에 관하여" 책세상 2006
• 4 J. Gray, "하찮은 인간" 호모 라피엔스 2010
• 5 오오구시 다쿠야, "탄소배출권 - 거래와 시장" 아카데미프레스 2009
• 6 이영철, "철학적 탐구" 책세상 2006
• 7 이정임, "철학이란 무엇인가" 현대미학사 1995
• 8 D. H. Meadows, "지구의 위기"
• 9 이덕연, "재정헌법의 흠결에 대한 헌법정책적 평가" 한국법제연구원 2005
• 10 최영한, "재정학" 웅지경영아카데미 2004
• 11 배득종, "신재무행정" 박영사 2005
• 12 송원근, "선진국의 복지지출과 재정건전성, In 지속가능한 복지체계와 재정정책" 2011
• 13 이덕연, "생태철학과 심층생태주의의 헌법적 함의" 2 (2): 2011
• 14 안종범, "복지지출의 전망과 과제, In 지속가능한 복지체계와 재정정책" 2011
• 15 최장집, "민주화 이후의 민주주의" 후마니타스 2002
• 16 Paul Krugman, "미래를 말한다" 현대경제연구원 2008
• 17 김화정, "그들이 말하지 않는 23가지" 부키 2010
• 18 이덕연, "국채발행에 대한 헌법적 제한" 3 : 2001
• 19 張善姬, "국가부채관리를 위한 법적 과제" 한국공법학회 33 (33): 293-322, 2005
• 20 김원옥, "교의 종말" 한언출판사 2005
• 21 D. Orrell, "경제학혁명(Economyth)" B웨이브 2011
• 22 전광석, "持續可能性과 世代間 正義" 한국헌법학회 17 (17): 273-323, 2011
• 23 P. Sieben, "Was beduetet Nachhaltigkeit als Rechtsbegriff" 2003
• 24 C. Giles, "The vision thing"
• 25 F. Capra, "The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems" Anchor 1997
• 26 R. Wilkinson, "The Spirit Level Why Equality is Better for Everyone" Penguin Books 2010
• 27 Aristotle, "The Rhetoric and The Poetics of Aristotle" The Modern Library 1954
• 28 D. L. Meadows, "The Limits to Growth" Union Books 1972
• 29 A. Naess, "The Ecology of Wisdom, In Counterpoint" 2008
• 30 M. Bookchin, "The Ecology of Freedom" AK Press 2005
• 31 M. Lewis, "The Age Demanded: The Rhetoric of Karl Polanyi" 25 : 475-, 1991
• 32 UN, World commission on Environment and Development, "Our Common Future" Oxford University Press 1987
• 33 A. Peccei, "One Hundred Pages for the Future" Pergamon Press 1981
• 34 De Martino, "On the Needs for and Content of a Professional Economic Ethics, In Furture Directions for Heterodox Economics" The University of Michigan Press 2008
• 35 M. Moesl, "Nachhaltigkeit und Haushaltsrecht, In Nachghaltigkeit als Verbundbegriff" Mohr Siebeck 2008
• 36 A. Glaser, "Nachhaltige Entwicklung und Demokratie" Mohr Siebeck GmbH & Co. K 2006
• 37 R. F. Garnett, "Introduction: Pluralism and The Future of Heterodox Economics, In Future Directions for Heterodox Economics" The University of Michigan Press 2008
• 38 R. Goodland, "Introduction to Environmentally Sustainable Economic Development: Building on Brudtland" World Bank 1991
• 39 G. Monbiot, "If we behave as if it's too late, then our prophecy is bound to come true: However unlikely success might be, we can't afford to abandon efforts to cut emissions - we just don't have any better option"
• 40 J. M. Keynes, "Foreword to Essays in Persuasion" Brace and Company 1932
• 41 G. A. J. Klaassen, "Economics of sustainability or the sustainability of economics: different paradigms" 4 : 1991
• 42 J.-Ph. Bouchaud, "Economics needs a scientific revolution" 455 : 1181-, 2008
• 43 R. Nelson, "Economics as Religion" Pennsylvania State Univ. Press 2002
• 44 D. Pearce, "Economics and Environment" Edward Elgar 1998
• 45 H.-J. Menzel, "Das Konzept der “nachhaltigen Entwicklung” - Herausforderung an Rechtssetzung und Rechtsanwendung" 2001
• 46 H.-J. Chang, "Breaking the mould: an institutionalist political economy alternative to the neo-liberal theory of the market and the state" 2002
• 47 J. Oliver, "Blind feminism has hurt our children"
• 48 기획재정부, "2011-2015년 국가채무관리계획" 2011
• 49 기획예산처, "2005 나라살림" 2005