해방 정국에서의 박헌영(朴憲永)과 김일성(金日成)의 갈등 = A Study of Conflict between Park Hun-young and Kim Il-sung during 1945-1953 in Korea

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

［1］This article was devised to depict the conflict between two Communist leaders Park Hun-young and Kim Il-sung,and its result in the age of Liberation(1945-1953) of Korea.
［2］As a genius, Park was born irregular son in a poor family.Being a concubine of small land-lord,his mother managed a tavern.His brievances, which he had experienced in his child-boyhood seriously effected his political behavior afterwards.After studies ay regular schools, he was indulged in the domestic commumist movement.On the other side, Kim Il-sung was born in Christain family,amd connected with Communism,while being exiled with his father in Manchuria.On the Liberation day,he was captain of 88 Bribade in Red Army.
［3］Park amd Kim were contract in their political line.
(1) park was indulged in the peoples frpnt,but Kim in national unification front.
(2) In the divice fo antional indepentent fight, Park preferred to Lenin's vanguard theory,but Kim stepped on populism.
(3) Park and Kim clashed with the building of North Korean Branch of Korean Communist party.
Park wanted to control the North Korean Commnnist including Kim under the principle of "One-party in One-state,"
But Kim,backed by the Red Army in North Korea,proclaimed to establish the North Korean Labor Party under the name of "distinct situation."
(4) In the process of 3 parties merge of Korean Communist Party,Korean Peoples Party and Korean New Democratic Party, Park wanted to stand on the center of leftist circle but failed.Kim wished to merge the three parties around Ryu Woon-hyung.When it failed,Kim concluded that Park's secrtarianism was reaponsible to it.
(5) Park could not look-over the U.S. Military Government's policy to collaborate the moderate leftist Ryu Woon-hyung and the moderate rightist Kim Kyu-sik.
But Kim wanted that Ryu could bring Park under his control through collaboration.
(6) Joseph stalin chose Kim rather than Park, because ha preferred the Commimtern-oriented to the domestic communist.
［4］At the origins and process of the Korean War, Park belived the possibility of people's uprising's but Kim, who has experienced the armed struggle against Japanese rule, preferred to guerilla strife.When they lost the Korean War, Kim shuffled the responsibility for defeat on to Park, and purged him.
［5］concludingly speaking, the conflicts between Park and Kim were the struggle between the domestic-classical commumist and Comminterm,but Kim won the game under the favorable auapices of J. Stalin.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 머리말
• 2. 가계와 성장, 그리고 정치적 오리엔테이션
• 1) 가정 환경과 출생
• 2) 학업 과정
• 3) 일제 시대의 활약
• 3. 노선의 갈등
• 1) 인민 전선인가, 민족 통일 전선인가?
• 2) 전위(前衛)인가, 민중인가?
• 3) 조선공산당 북조선분국을 둘러싼 갈등
• 4) 3당 합당의 갈등
• 5) 좌우 합작을 둘러찬 갈등
• 6) 소련의 선택: 토착 공산주의자 대 해외파 공산주의자
• 4. 한국전쟁에 대한 인식의 차이와 책임 공방
• 5. 결론