골수강내 금속 고정술을 이용한 대퇴 전자하 골절의 치료 = Treatment of Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures Using Intramedullary Devices

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the result between closed reduction and minimal open reduction in case of difficult reduction for subtrochanteric fractures fixed with intramedullary nail. Materials and Methods: From Jan. 2001 to May 2005, 35 cases of subtrochanteric femur fracture treated by intramedullary nail and followed up for more than a year were selected out of 42 subtrochanteric femur fractures. Fielding classification and Russel-Taylor classification were used, and according to the fracture classification and method of reduction, the patients were grouped into closed or open reduction group. Fracture with minimal displacement or anatomical reduction was fixed by closed reduction, but in case of failed closed reduction or loss of reduction, minimal incision was made for open reduction and internal fixation, and the result between two groups were compared. Results: In total of 35 cases, 15 cases were fixed by closed reduction and the rest 20 cases required open reduction. Operation time, amount of transfusion, total hospital days, partial weight bearing ambulation, and union time did not show significant differences between two groups. Ambulation and range of motion after the operation were satisfying in both groups. Conclusion: In treatment of subtrochanteric femur fracture with intramedullary nail, both closed and open reduction shows satisfying result, therefore when anatomical reduction is difficult to achiev by closed reduction, minimal incision open reduction and additional fixation is strongly recommended to obtain anatomical reduction and firm fixation.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 Fernch BG, "Use of an interlocked cepahlomedullary nail for subtrochanteric fracture stbalilization" 348 : 95-100, 1998
• 2 Evans EM, "Trochanteric fractures; a review of 110 cases treated by nail-plate fixation" 33 : 192-204, 1951
• 3 Jeon TS, "Treatment of communited subtrochatneric fractures of the femur by high energy trauma" 19 : 135-140, 2006
• 4 Froimson AI, "Treatment of communited subtrochanteric fractures of the femur" 131 : 465-472, 1970
• 5 Wiss DA, "Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. Results of treatment by interlocking nailing" 283 : 231-236, 1992
• 6 Schatzker J, "Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur" 11 : 539-554, 1980
• 7 Fielding JW, "Subtrochanteric fracture" 92 : 86-99, 1973
• 8 Joachim W, "Pitfalls and complications in the use of the proximal femoral nail" 196-212, 2004
• 9 Thorngren KG, "Optimal treatment of hip fractures" 241 : 31-34, 1991
• 10 Kaufer H, "Mechanics of the treatment hip hip injuries" 146 : 53-61, 1980
• 11 Fogagnolo F, "Intramedullary fixationof pertrochanteric hip fractures with short AO- ASIF proximal femoral nail" 124 : 27-31, 2004
• 12 Aune AK, "Gamma nail vs compression screw for trochanteric femoral fractures 15 reoperations in a prospective, randomized study of 378 patiens" 65 : 127-130, 1994
• 13 Rockwood CA Jr, "Fractures in adults. 4th ed" Lippincott- Raven 1741-1756, 1996
• 14 Asher MA, "Compression fixation of subtrochanteric fractures" 117 : 202-208, 1976
• 15 Watson HK, "Classification, treatment and complications of the adult subtrochanteric fractures" 60 : 457-480, 1964
• 16 Canale ST, "Campbell's operative orthopedics" 2897-2908, 2004
• 17 Fielding JW, "Biomechanical characteristics and surgical management of subtrochanteric fractures" 5 : 629-650, 1974
• 18 Velasco RU, "Analysis of treatment problems in subtrochanteric fractures of the femur" 18 : 518-523, 1978
• 19 Zickel RE, "An intramedullary fixation device for the proximal part of the femur. Nine year's experience" 58 : 866-872, 1976
• 20 Parker MJ, "A new mobility for predicting mortality after hip fracture" 75 : 797-798, 1993