韓國新聞史 : 新聞과 事件 Events and Press = The History of Korean Press

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The chronological explanation of the press is not, strictly speaking, a historical study of journal. This thesis has a purpose to analyse the attitude of journals facing to the events. It concerns from 1910 to 1945, period of japanese ocupation in Korea.
After the conclusion of annexation in 1910, Japanese administration had prohibited koreans from publishing the journal untill the ‘Independent movement’in 1919. After this movement, called in other words‘3.1 movement’two Korean journals, Cho Sun Il Bo and Dong A Il Bo were published in 1920.
For the main objects,Cho Sun Il Bo took 「New Civilization」 and 「Progress」 in stead of national independence. Dong A Il Bo emphasized three major functions:「Information」, 「Transmittance of Public Opinion」, and 「Ideal Indication」. We can find that two Korean papers didn`t openly declare their final purpose, namely, Korean independence. It means that at the begining, Korean press didn`t criticize directly japanese occupation policy in the country.
Concerning the moderate attitudes of these journals, we can induce two hypothesis. First, they decided that it was unrealistic to insist openly Korean independence from the begining. Second, in order to obtain final purpose of independence, they might try to find realistic measures, that is, ‘progress’for Cho Sun Il Bo and ‘cultural improvement’for Dong A Il Bo.
Unfortunately, ‘progress’ and ‘cultural improvement ’ were sometimes translated by Japanese administration as a ‘transforation of the national spirit’ and these movements were exploited to make Korea independence as an unrealisable dream. Facing to two major events after 1920, these papers had to prove their limit as a national press. They were 「6.10 Man Sai」 in 1926 and 「students` collision at Kwang Jou」 in 1926.
‘6.10 Man Sai’ was occurred at the funeral ceremony of Yung-Hi Emperor. Koreans expressed their grief over his death and made a demonstration demanding for the liberation. Cho Sun Il Bo advised Japanese adminstration not to consider this event was an occasional one planned by some students. According to this it was an example of continuous and intarissable movements for liberation. Dong A Il Bo indicated that it was a proof of the Korean spiritual independence in spite of he was under the material occupation by Japan.
‘Students’ collision at Kwang-Jou` in 1929 made an evidence to the fact that nationalism between two countries was always in conflict not to be solved. Cho Sun Il Bo solisited parents` consideration and their reason in order to solve the problems without any more accidents. But Dong A Il Bo made an accent that this event was not the only one in this country and indicated it was a result coming from unequal realtions between Korea and Japan.
Even if two major journals explained cleayly the events from time to time, they always hesitated to make a conclusion that national movement was indispensable for liberation. In stead of they had a role of leader for this movement on the purpose of independence, they were satisfied themselves with the movement for the eradication of illiteracy.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 序 論
• Ⅰ. 독립신문
• 1. 독립신문의 創刊
• 2. 민족주의, 민주주의
• 3. 獨立協會
• Ⅱ. 황성신문의 「是日也放聲大哭」
• 1. 日本의 對韓言論政策
• 2. 장지연의 「是日也放聲大哭
• 3. 大韓每日申報의 抗日論調
• Ⅲ. 民族言論의 不在
• 1. 한일합방과 言論政策
• 3. 日人新聞의 독점기
• 4. 日人新聞의 왜곡된 태도
• 5. 每日申報의親日論調
• 6. 海外新聞과 잡지
• 7. 민족지로서의 海外新聞과 잡지
• Ⅳ. 朝鮮日報, 東亞日報
• 1. 두신신문의 設立趣旨文
• 2. 東亞日報 創刊號 社說
• 3. 文化政治와 民族分裂政治
• 4. 朝鮮日報의 四次停刊
• 5. 東亞日報의 四次停刊
• Ⅴ. 言論과 兩大事件
• 1. 6.10만세운동
• 2. 광주학생사건
• 結 論