韓國 近代 兒童文學의 形成過程 硏究 = (A) study on the process of formation in modern Korean children's literature

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this dissertation I have intended to examine the process of formation in modern Korean children's literature Because the purpose of this dissertation is to study the characteristics of modern juvenile literature and to explore the modernity in children's literature in relation to modern children or childhood First, this dissertation has sought to analyze the socio-historical meaning of childhood which is one of the pre-conditions in the formation of juvenile literature, through which we can distinguish the adult literature and that of juvenile literature Though the children has been existed in pre ?modern, the childhood which we see through this dissertation has been produced in the modern period Therefore it is true that Karatani Kojin said the discovery of childhood was made by discovery of landscape or the inside.
This study has discussed that the childhood was produced from the era of modern Through the process of modernization in Korea, the subject is a core of modernity has been broken up, If we don't suppose Otherness, we can't find the childhood The children who have been produced by separation between adult and child were a mirror which adult itself has gazed at, So the modernity divided an adult/child, we can know that juvenile or childhood is a result of modernity because it supposes Other(Otherness), therefore it shows a split of subject.
The children must be returned as a subject, to give an opportunity to children oppressed The trial in this dissertation to analyze the unconsciousness of the modernity is similar to feminism, post-colonialism and ecology These are common in the meaning of possibility of post-modern thought Therefore a juvenile is a metaphor of feminity, because it means Other(Otherness), As Jacque Lacan who was very famous psychologist, said "woman is a symptom of man", we can argue that children is a symptom of adult.
Consequently the study of the border between adult and juvenile intended to analyze unconsciousness of the modern. We can see a modern subject through a position of adult which look into juvenile, as we can see the theory of oppression through nature which was found by man, The children, nature and woman are considered as Other, so we can say that they mean the feminity In this dissertation I was interested in a border between adult and juvenile because I was wondered how children's literature was forming in Korea.
In Chapter Two, I examined how the modern thought was related to juvenile literature Especially in the 19th Centuries the modern education systematized children, so children that was systematized by modern education which was internalized development of theory of knowledge, Virtue, and Sound body(Ji智·Duk德·Che體)'.In addition to sanitary discourse of Imperialism intended to control children and family with healthy body of children, And a juvenile literature began to form in focussing on Korean children at that and it was insured by the so called modern style education, knowledge, Virtue, and Sound body(Ji智·Duk德·Che體)', the sanitary discourse of anti-Imperialism in the period of Japanese imperialism.
In Chapter Three I examined how juvenile literature started in the center of 'Sonyun(Boyhood)'. Sonyun was a general magazine which was published by Nam-Seon Choi in 1908, and it aimed at 'Sonyun'. 'Sonyun' was a hero who was lacked in childhood and signified of modern children who could perform double task such as enlightenment and patriotism Then 'Chungnyun(Youth)'was emerged and childhood was discoverd in 1920s.
'Sonyun' was a object of enlightenment as well as a subject of patriotism Therefore 'Sonyun' was a ideological being On the other hand 'Eorini' proposed by Jeong-Whan Bang was a subject of national movement by the demand of nationalism, The children's literature gave a ideological character children, a future of nation So the meanings of 'children' have changed like this To be true the meaning of literature connected with education in the 1900s, the field of juvenile literature was emerged from the project of enlightenment at that time On the contrary the field of children's literature has started to be reduced after the 1910s That means the children's literature has begun with the independence of general literature, Juvenile literature was not different from general literature in the 1900s That field of literature was moved from the project of enlightenment and related to the itself.
In Chapter Four, I analyzed that how Korean juvenile literature developed in the center of 'Eorini(Childhood)' And Eorini was a magazine for children, so was contained many children's song, fairy tales, novel for children and pictures, and so on The discover of child mind which only children have was a discover of inside of the subject The children's literature began to have autonomy of modernity, but it was not free from educational function in the 1920s The modern juvenile literature shows that it is related to the function of education until nowadays.
I can conclude the border between adult and child is contained in the modern thought through the forming process of modern juvenile literature I have studied that the field of modern juvenile literature completely has concealed the modernity and that the origin of children's literature is not located in the 1920s but in the 1900s But this dissertation has a limitation of this study which has only investigated from the 1900s to the 1920s.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목차
• I. 서론 = 1
• 1. 연구 목적 = 1
• 2. 연구사 검토 및 연구 방법 = 1
• 1) 연구사 검토 및 문제제기 = 4
• 2) 연구 방법 = 12
• II. 근대적 인식과 아동문학의 관계 = 20
• 1. 근대 교육과 아동의 제도화 = 20
• 2. 제국주의 위생학과 계몽담론 = 30
• 3. 知·情·意와 知·德·體 ; 근대적 계몽의 기획 = 40
• III. '소년' - 아동문학의 태동 = 46
• 1. 계몽과 애국적 담론의 만남 = 46
• 1) '소년'에서 '청춘'으로 = 46
• 2) '소년'과 근대적아동상 = 59
• 2. 계몽의 기획과 아동문학 = 66
• 1) 민족주의와 계몽 담론의자리 = 66
• 2) 정치적 공공영역의 영향 = 73
• IV. '어린이' - 아동문학의 발전 = 80
• 1. '어린이' 의 발견과 동심주의 = 80
• 1) '어린이' 발견과 소년운동 = 80
• 2) 동심주의와 여성성 = 92
• 2. 아동문학장의 분화 = 108
• 1) 미적 자율성과 교육성의 공존 = 108
• 2) 이야기 형식의 서사적 특징 = 115
• V. 결론 = 129
• 참고문헌 = 133
• Abstract = 140