著作权保护刑民衔接问题研究 = A Study on the Connection between Criminal Law and Civil Law in Copyright Protection

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Different from the order standard of criminal norms, the main task of civil norms such as copyright law is to protect private rights and regulate civil infringement.
There are differences in normative value between the two jurisdictions, and the main object of the crime of copyright infringement is the order of market competition, while the copyright law mainly protects the works created by civil subjects. In terms of copyright protection, the connection between the criminal and the people is legitimate, because the primary functional value of copyright law is empowerment rather than protection of rights. Only when copyright law gives a series of proprietary rights to copyright owners, copyright owners have proprietary rights of absolute right nature. Therefore, the protection of proprietary rights of copyright in criminal law is also based on empowerment of copyright law. Criminal imputation is also premised on the existence of relevant norms in copyright law, which not only requires that the scope of defining key terms of copyright in criminal law should be unified with the pre-copyright law, but also that the establishment of the crime of copyright infringement should be within the scope of civil torts that can constitute crimes as stipulated in copyright Law, and comply with the constituent elements of torts as stipulated in copyright Law. In the past, some people believed that criminal law could criminalize torts independently of copyright law, denying the legitimacy of the connection between the criminal and the people, and supporting the disconnection between the criminal and the people. However, the revision of the 11th Amendment to Criminal Law is enough to show that lawmakers finally fell to the connection between the criminal and the people. The act of spreading to the public through the information network and the act of copying and distributing, as well as the amendment of the law that includes the avoidance of technology measures into the scope of the regulation of the crime of copyright infringement has also solved part of the problem of the disconnection between the criminal and the people. However, legal norms are lagging behind. In order to realize the connection between criminal and civilian protection and achieve the unity of legal order when facing the new dilemma of copyright protection in the future, and to truly solve the existing problem of disconnection between criminal and civilian protection of copyright protection, the concept of connection between criminal and civilian should be implemented in legislation and judicial practice in the future.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 张浩泽, "论著作权法与刑法的衔接: 以犯罪圈的划定为路径" (6) : 2019
• 2 王 迁, "论著作权保护刑民衔接的正当性" (8) : 2021
• 3 欧阳本祺, "论网络环境下著作权侵权的刑事归责——以网络服务提供者的刑事责任为中心" (3) : 2018
• 4 刘杨东, "论信息网络传播权的刑事保护路径" (7) : 2013
• 5 王晓晨, "论侵犯著作权罪中的 “复制发行”" 中国人民公安大学 2022
• 6 申莉萍, "论中国刑事附带民事诉讼制度的价值定位———从刑事附带民事诉讼的存废之争说起" (4) : 2012
• 7 日本文化庁, "著作権法及びプログラムの著作物に係る登録の特例に関する法律の一部を改正する法律(令和２年法律第48号)"
• 8 贾学胜, "著作权刑法保护视阈下 “复制发行”的法教义学解读" (6) : 2019
• 9 刘银良, "著作权兜底条款的是非与选择" (11) : 2019
• 10 龚义年, "网络著作权犯罪对传统刑事法之挑战及应对" (6) : 2017
• 11 仝其宪, "网络著作权犯罪刑事立法的反思与完善" (2) : 2016
• 12 郭 丹, "网络知识产权的刑事法保护" (3) : 2006
• 13 周光权, "网络服务提供商的刑事责任范围" (2) : 2015
• 14 罗海婷, "网络文学作品著作权的刑法保护研究" 西南政法大学 2019
• 15 熊理思, "知识产权刑事保护与其他法律保护之间的关系协调" 华东政法大学 2018
• 16 王昭武, "法秩序统一性视野下违法判断的相对性" (1) : 2015
• 17 郑善泽, "法秩序的统一性与违法的相对性" (7) : 2011
• 18 付晓雅, "数字时代著作权刑法保护的挑战与回应" (2) : 2020
• 19 陈锦川, "对著作权权利法定之理解" (2) : 2020
• 20 费安玲, "刑民共治视野下的深度链接行为" (4) : 2022
• 21 车 浩, "刑事立法的法教义学反思—基于 <刑法修正案(九)>的分析" (10) : 2015
• 22 张素敏, "全媒体环境下 “深度链接”行为的刑法规制" (2) : 2021
• 23 熊 琦, "中国著作权立法中的制度创新" (7) : 2018
• 24 寇占奎, "中国著作权犯罪体系的反思与重构" (6) : 2014
• 25 贺志军, "中国著作权刑法保护问题研究" 中国人民公安大学出版社 2011
• 26 汪赛飞, "“侵犯著作权罪”刑民并科下的责任聚合冲突" (1) : 2021