明代 土司制度 운용의 실상 ― 鎭雄府의 改土歸流와 革流歸土를 중심으로 ― = An Actual Operation of the Chieftaincy System in Ming Dynasty — Focusing on The Replacement of Chieftaincy with Officials and Its Return to Rule at Zhenxiong Fu —

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This thesis aims to present the multi-layered characteristic of the Chieftaincy System of the Ming Dynasty by examining the inheritance of the position of indigenous officials in Zhenxiong Prefecture, the geographically neighboring area of Yunan, Guizhou, Sichuan Provinces. The disputes over inheriting of the position of indigenous officials in Zhenxiong Prefecture led to the three time discussions about gaitu guiliu(改土歸流), the replacement of chieftaincy with officials, and the first attempt failed. The issue of gaitu guiliu was discussed for the first time in the third year of Jiading reign, 1524, when the Ming Dynasty designated Long Shou as the indigenous Prefect, which provoked antagonism from Long Zheng, the illegitimate son, who killed Long Shou. After suppressing Long Zheng’s rebellion, the Ming Dynasty implemented gaitu guiliu in the fifth year of Jiading era by presenting the nonexistence of his offspring as its reason.
However, Cheng Guang, who was designated as the circulating official prefect, failed to pacify ethnic minorities, and in the seventh year of Jiading era, in 1528, Sha Bao rebelled. Sha Bao insisted on restoring the native chieftaincy by appointing Long Sheng, the posthumous son of Long Shou, as chieftain. Although there was the second discussion about gaitu guiliu being made at the time, about whether to persist on gaitu guiliu or to restore indigenous officials, the Ming Dynasty eventually abolished the circulating officials and established the return of chieftaincy by designating Long Sheng as the subprefectural magistrate. The third time was in the 35th year of Wanli era when An Yaochen from Shuixi became the indigenous prefect of Zhenxiong Prefecture and tried to annex, which caused local officials to discuss about whether to implement gaitu guiliu or to banish An Yaochen and appoint the descendants of the Long family. The Ming Dynasty whose power was in decline at that time was reluctant to use force, and succeeded in discovering a descendant of the Long family and designated him as the indigenous official.
Although Mangbu indigenous region restored the indigenous officials through restoring the previous chieftaincy system after gaitu guiliu, there were continuous disputes over the inheritance of the position of indigenous officials. To remove the disputes, the Ming Dynasty proceeded to mend the regulations concerning the inheriting of chieftaincy. However, ethnic minorities kept putting the Ming Dynasty in trouble by falsely fabricating a successor.
In these circumstances, the Ming Dynasty wanted to keep the Chieftaincy System under the reason of cost-saving, and the ethnic minorities also wanted to maintain their region and secure their political legitimacy. Ethnic minorities, who had the complicated inheriting system, and the Ming Dynasty, who had the right to acknowledge the inheritance, had developed the tug of war for power over their interests, which indicates the significance of the dynamics of the operation of the Chieftaincy System during the Ming Dynasty. At least judging from the case of Zhenxiong Prefecture, the unique aspect of ethnic minorities —their complicated disputes over the inheriting of chieftaincy— paradoxically became an effective means to actively negotiate with the Chieftaincy System which the Ming Dynasty had arranged to rule the ethnic minorities.
Therefore, the Qing Dynasty who inherited the Chieftaincy System of the Ming Dynasty also had difficulty in solving these problems that the Ming Dynasty had to deal with. Eventually this struggle and the conflict between Ming Dynasty and the ethnic minorities who were involved in the power struggle between the central state and the peripheric region became the important factor for the implementation of gaitu guiliu at one sweep by the Qing Dynasty.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 클로딘 롱바르-살몽, "중국적 문화변용의 한 예―18세기 귀주성" 세창 2015
• 2 楊甫旺, "雲南彝族土司史研究" 雲南人民出版社 2017
• 3 光緖, "鎭雄州志"
• 4 藍武, "認同差異與“復流爲土”―明代廣西改土歸流反復性原因分析" (3) : 2010
• 5 王文光, "試論明朝對烏蒙等部的治理及其政治搏弈關系" 40 (40): 2008
• 6 毛奇齡, "蠻司合誌 (上)" 臺灣廣文書局 1968
• 7 魏源, "聖武記" 中華書局 1984
• 8 賀長齡, "皇朝經世文編" 國風出版社 1963
• 9 李文龍, "王朝與地方的博弈―乾隆朝車里土司的“復流爲土”" 35 (35): 2017
• 10 諸葛元聲, "滇史" 德宏民族出版社 1994
• 11 "淸實錄"
• 12 陳子龍, "明經世文編" 中華書局 1997
• 13 沈乾芳, "明淸時期彝族土司聯姻對西南地區的影響" 32 (32): 2011
• 14 "明會典"
• 15 萬, "明會典" 中華書局 1989
• 16 顔丙震, "明後期黔蜀毗鄰地區土司紛爭研究" 人民日報出版社 2018
• 17 "明實錄"
• 18 穀應泰, "明史紀事本末" 中華書局 1977
• 19 동북아역사재단, "明史外國傳譯註･5~7 (土司傳･上中下)" 동북아역사재단 2013
• 20 "明史"
• 21 鄒映, "明代雲貴地區改流復土現象硏究" 廣西師範大學 2012
• 22 姜建國, "明代雲貴地區改土歸流與掌土治民方式的變遷" 32 (32): 2016
• 23 王強, "明代西南地區改土歸流硏究" 浙江大學 2010
• 24 顔丙震, "明代芒部(鎭雄)土知府承襲紛爭與改流問題" 39 (39): 2017
• 25 佘貽澤, "明代土司制度" 學生書局 1968
• 26 乾隆, "文淵閣四庫全書"
• 27 曺學佺, "文淵閣四庫全書"
• 28 廖麗, "從女性土司的設置及承襲看明代土司制度―以商勝･奢香･秦良玉爲例" 35 (35): 2014
• 29 溫春來, "從“異域”到“舊疆”" 生活･讀書･新知三聯書店 2008
• 30 陳棣芳, "彝漢文合璧<<水西安氏族譜>>箋證與解讀" 中央民族大學出版社 2017
• 31 覃成號, "廣西“改流復土”淺語" (1) : 1993
• 32 道光, "大定府志"
• 33 李良品, "土司承襲制度中國家治理的影響" 29 (29): 2018
• 34 萬曆, "四川總志"
• 35 楊鴻年, "中國政制史" 安徽教育出版社 1990
• 36 王天璽, "中國彝族通史 (권2)" 雲南人民出版社 2012
• 37 李良品, "中國土司學導論" 中國社會科學出版社 2018
• 38 龔蔭, "中國土司制度史" 四川人民出版社 2012
• 39 王開隊, "13-18世紀雲貴川交界地區政區設置變化趨勢研究" 24 (24): 2009