교육의 형이상학적 차원과 종교적 차원 = The Metaphysical and Artistical Dimension of Education

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to reveal the relation of the metaphysical and artistical dimension of education by analysing concept of mind implied in Schiller's 「On the Aesthetic Education of Men」(AEM). Analysing relation of both dimensions, we come to understand that education is the process of 'cultivation of mind' which cannot be reduced to any empirical value.
In the 「AEM」, Schiller conceptualizes the human being in two different dimensions, namely, Person and Condition, and discusses the relation between them, so as to clarify the concept of Beauty which is the way to the ideal political state, that is the Aesthetic State. According to Schiller, to develop of mind with the Beauty which is the way to cultivation of human nature is the only road to building up the Aesthetic State.
Schiller's argument on the relation of 'Person' and 'Condition', which is the conceptual apparatus to understand human mind, contributes to clarifying the conceptual relation of education and cultivation of mind.
In order to explain the reciprocal relation of 'Person' and 'Condition' it is necessary to clarify the concept of Form drive and Sense drive, Form drive is the disposition of mind, which intends on giving men the freedom to bring harmony into the diversity of his manifestation, and to affirm his Person among all his changes of Condition. Sense drive is the disposition of mind which is to attach oneself to and turn him into matter manifested in the external world. Formal drive and Sense drive is the concept which is logically derived from the concept of Play drive in which the other two drives co-operate and work in concert. Play drive can be defined as free and predispositional movement of human nature which is directed toward the aesthetic qualities of phenomena and Beauty.
In order to give a vitality to the theoretical explanation on the static and dynamic aspect of the activity of mind, it is necessary to discuss the process of education which embodies the dynamic activity of mind. Education is the typical situation in which not only the validity of theoretical explanation of educational process is assessed, but also free activity of Play drive is protected and developed. It is necessary to clarify the metaphysical and artistical dimension of education in order to reveal how educational process becomes the typical situation which embodies the activity of Play drive.
For Schiller, the concept of Beauty is closely connected with the metaphysical dimension of education. The concept of Beauty is very important to identify the possibility of how the reality as the ultimate aim becomes the original source of dynamic power of mind. The concept of Truth, Good, Holy reveals the distance between the Reality and human being one the one hand, concept of Beauty reveals the man's attachment and longing for reality.
Nature of the process of subject-matter education clarifies the nature of the cultivation of human and how to cultivate human nature. The process of subject-matter education is the process in which Truth, Beauty, Good, Holy is exhibited in 'here and now' and 'with all one's heart', and the ultimate reality is revealed in temporal order. The existence of teacher prerequisites to which reality is revealed in temporal order.
According to Schiller, the subject-matter is a work of art as the intellectual creation, which is beyond need. The subject-matter as 'manifestation' of metaphysical reality becomes the way to exhibit self-moving reality to life. The existence of teacher who is participating in teaching process embodies the value of subject-matter as the work of art. Teacher 'internalizes' and 'communicates' the knowledge of subject-matter simultaneously in the classroom. Communicating process is a dynamic process in which teacher's Play drive and student's Play drive interact reciprocally.
The concept of education as an art, reveals the weakness of the established theories of curriculum, which have explained the relation ...

국문 초록 (Abstract)

이 글은 쉴러의 「심성교육론」에 함의된 마음의 개념을 분석함으로써 교육의 형이상학적 차원과 예술적 차원의 관계를 드러내는 데에 그 목적이 있다. 쉴러는「심성교육론」에서 인간 존재를 본체와 상황으로 구분하고 양자의 관련에 관해 논의한다. 유희충동은 본체와 상황으로 구분되는 마음의 두 층 사이의 역동적 교섭을 개념화한 것으로서, 美를 향한 인간의 마음의 정향적 운동을 부각시킨다. 교육은 심성함양의 과정으로서, 유희충동의 개념으로 요약되는 마음의 운동에 관한 이론적 설명이 구체적으로 확인되는 전형적 사태이다. 교육사태가 어떻게 유희충동의 전형적 사태가 되는가는 교육의 형이상학적 차원과 예술적 차원을 동시에 해명함으로써 드러난다. 교육의 형이상학적 차원과 예술적 차원은 각각 교육의 궁극적 목적(또는 원천)과 역동적 과정을 부각시키는 교육의 상이한 두 차원으로서, 이 두 차원간의 관련은 교육의 목적(또는 원천)과 그것이 구현되는 과정 사이의 상호적 교섭을 드러내어 줌으로써 실재를 가시화하는 예술적 창조 과정으로서의 교육의 특이한 지위를 설명하는데 기여한다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 London, "倫理學과 敎育" 교육과학사 19661980
• 2 황상민, "靈魂不滅性의 敎育學的 含意-「파이드로스」에 나타난 영혼불멸성과 에로스의 관계" 2005
• 3 김영미, "콜링우드 藝術理論의 교육학적 함의" 한국도덕교육학회 13 (13): 2001
• 4 이홍우, "주희와 듀이: 교육이론의 메타프락시스적 성격" 한국도덕교육학회 18 (18): 1-26, 2006a
• 5 장성모, "인성교육의 동양적 전통" 서울: 성경재 2 : 103-157, 1997a
• 6 차미란, "오우크쇼트의 교육이론 연구" 2000
• 7 차미란, "오우크쇼트 정치이론의 메타프락시스적 성격" 65-86, 2006
• 8 장성모, "열린교육의 두 차원: 종교와 예술" 서울: 성경재 4 : 117-153, 1997b
• 9 김영미, "쉴러의 心性敎育論 硏究" 2002
• 10 박채형, "쉴러의 「心性敎育論」에 나타난 敎育의 理想으로서의 自由" 한국도덕교육학회 13 (13): 2001
• 11 이홍우, "마음의 신비와 교육의 신비" 서울: 성경재 4 : 1-40, 2000b
• 12 장성모, "마음의 重層構造와 敎育의 宗敎的 意味" 한국도덕교육학회 17 (17): 223-243, 2005
• 13 이미종, "도덕성의 원천으로서의 심미적 자유" 한국도덕교육학회 13 (13): 2001
• 14 진영석, "도덕교육의 理想으로서의 天人合一" 서울: 성경재 69-100, 1997
• 15 신춘호, "교육의 선험적 차원: 이론과 실제의 관련" 2006
• 16 이홍우, "교육과정이론" 서울: 교육과학사 2003
• 17 이홍우, "교과의 내면화" 아시아태평양 교육발전단 연구 1 (1): 249-271, 2000d
• 18 박채형, "교과교육의 목적으로서의 자유: 쉴러의 「심성교육론」에 나타난 교육과정 이론" 18 (18): 89-108, 2005
• 19 이홍우, "藝術과 敎育" 한국도덕교육학회 12 (12): 1-22, 2000a
• 20 신춘호, "敎育理論으로서의 칸트 哲學: 判斷力批判 解釋" 2005
• 21 함정실, "敎育의 重層構造에 비추어 본 敎育內容과 敎育方法" 2002
• 22 이홍우, "敎育의 目的과 難點難點" 서울: 敎育科學社 1998
• 23 이홍우, "敎育의 槪念" 1991
• 24 장성모, "敎育의 宗敎的 側面" 한국도덕교육학회 12 (12): 23-54, 2000
• 25 장성모, "敎科敎育과 心性涵養" 대한수학교육학회 25집 : 1-13, 2004
• 26 이홍우, "性理學의 敎育理論" 서울: 성경재 1 : 2000c
• 27 이홍우, "增補 知識의 構造와 敎科" 서울: 교육과학사 2006b
• 28 Peters R, "“What is an Educational Process” The Concept of Education" 11-12, 1967
• 29 Schiller F, "Uber die Asthetische Erziehung des Menschen in einer Reihe von Briefen On the Aesthetic Education of Man in a Series of Letter" Oxford University 19751967
• 30 Boyd, "The History of Western Education" 교육과학사 19521994
• 31 London, "Rationalism in Politics" 1-36, 19471962
• 32 Eisner, "On the Design and Evaluation of School Programs 교육과정의 구성과 평가" Macmillan 단대출판사 19791983