지역다자주의 틀에서의 미-중 경쟁과 한국의 다자안보전략구상: `아세안 중심성`(ASEAN Centrality)의 교훈 = US-China Rivalry in Multilateral Regional Security and Korea`s Strategic Choice: A Lesson from `ASEAN Centrality`

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Over the past decades, much scholarly and policy efforts have been made in order to seek the means of advancing and institutionalizing multilateral regional security cooperation in Northeast Asia. Yet, the region still lacks in a formal regional security cooperation entity. This paper intends not to discuss the widely-discussed achievements and limits of developing such an entity. Instead, the paper examines the background, processes, and impacts of the US-China rivalry in the field of multilateral regional security, both at the regional and global levels. Through this examination, the paper discusses how relatively weaker states in the region, including Korea, have been influenced by great powers` competition over multilateralism and what these small and middle powers could and should do to maintain their own leverage. Taking a lesson from ASEAN, which has developed its regional identity and influences through its `collective voices,` the paper argues that while Korea maintains a strong bilateral security alliance with the US, it should develop bi-multilateral mechanisms, minilateral cooperation systems, and other various multilateral approaches to effectively deal with regional security threats. Given limited national capacities compared to those of regional great powers, it would be wiser for Korea to focus on taking initiatives in the areas of soft power when pursuing multilateral security initiatives. However, such diplomatic efforts could be frustrated depending upon great power politics and changing geopolitical situations. Therefore, Korea should strengthen its comprehensive national power that incorporates military, economic, cultural, and other national merits.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 이상현, "한반도 평화체제와 한미동맹" 극동문제연구소 22 (22): 225-256, 2006
• 2 한석희, "중국의 신안보개념('新安全觀')-다자간 안보에 대한 중국의 협력가능성과 한계-" 국제지역연구센터 8 (8): 221-244, 2004
• 3 신윤환, "아세안+3이 중심이 된 동아시아 지역협력을 되돌아 본다" 서강 대학교 동아연구소 2012
• 4 박상남, "상하이 협력기구의 평가와 전망" 아시아.유럽미래학회 11 (11): 121-137, 2014
• 5 이용재, "빈 회의와 유럽협조 체제 - 19세기 전반기 유럽질서의 형성 -" 국제지역문화원 6 (6): 87-110, 2015
• 6 최종건, "동북아 다자적 협력 질서 변화와 6자 회담: 다자적 협상과 지역질서 변화를 중심으로" 국제학연구소 21 (21): 1-24, 2012
• 7 이신화, "동북아 다자안보구상: 도전과 과제" JPI 정책포럼 2014
• 8 전재성, "대전환의 파도 한국의 선택 제2장" 클라우드나인 2017
• 9 宋伟, "中国的周边外交: 多边主义还是双边主义" 4 (4): 5-12, 2015
• 10 Acharya, Amitav, "Will Asia’s Past Be Its Future?" 28 (28): 149-164, 2004
• 11 Hemmer, Christopher, "Why is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and the Origins of Multilateralism" 56 (56): 575-607, 2002
• 12 Khalizad, Zalmay, "What does Congagement Mean and Why should the United States Pursue It?"
• 13 Rozman, Gilbert, "Unraveling the Japan-South Korea ‘Virtual Alliance’: Populism and Historical Revisionism in the Face of Conflicting Regional Strategies" 46 (46): 761-784, 2008
• 14 Goh, Evelyn, "The Struggle for Order: Hegemony, Hierarchy & Transition in Post-Cold War East Asia" Oxford University Press 2013
• 15 이신화, "The Pursuit of Multilateral Security Cooperation Amidst Growing Political and Economic Divides in Northeast Asia" 한국국제정치학회 13 (13): 353-381, 2015
• 16 Schroeder, Paul, "The Nineteenth Century System: Balance of Power or Political Equilibrium?" 15 (15): 135-153, 1989
• 17 Green, Mike, "The Legacy of Obama’s ‘Pivot’ to Asia"
• 18 Di Floristella, "The ASEAN Regional Security Partnership: Strengths and Limits of Cooperation System" Palgrave Macmillan 2015
• 19 Lee, Shin-wha., "South Korea’s Middle Power Multilateral Diplomacy:Optimistic and Pessimistic Views"
• 20 Caouette, Dominique, "Rife for a New Asian Multilateralism? Asean and Contemporary Regional Dynamics" 10 (10): 5-36, 2011
• 21 Keohane, Robert O, "Reciprocity in International Relations" 49 (49): 1-27, 1986
• 22 Christensen, Thomas J, "Posing Problems Without Catching Up:China’s Rise and Challenges for U.S. Security Policy" 25 (25): 5-40, 2001
• 23 Dockrill, Saki R., "Palgrave Advances in Cold War History" Palgrave 2006
• 24 "PEW Research Center data"
• 25 Mulder, Niels, "Mysticism in Java: Ideology in Indonesia" Kanisius Publishing House 2005
• 26 Ruggie, John, "Multilateralism Matters: the Theory and Praxis of an Institutional Form" Cambridge University Press 3-47, 1992
• 27 Caporaso, James A, "International Relations Theory and Multilateralism: The Search for Foundations" 46 (46): 599-632, 1992
• 28 Hopmann, P. Terrence, "International Cooperation: The Extents and Limits of Multilateralism" Cambridge University Press 95-110, 2010
• 29 Vickers, Adrian, "History of Modern Indonesia" Cambridge University Press 2005
• 30 Kang, David, "Getting Asia Wrong: The Need for New Analytical Frameworks" 27 (27): 57-85, 2003
• 31 Hathaway, Robert M., "George W. Bush and East Asia: A First Term Assessment" Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars 2005
• 32 Changhe, Su, "Effective Multilateralism Through the Looking Glass of East Asia" Palgrave Macmillan 70-89, 2013
• 33 Acharya, Amitav, "Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order" Routledge 2009
• 34 Fung, Courtney J., "China’s Troop Contributions to UN Peacekeeping" United States Institute of Peace 2016
• 35 Choedon, Yeshi, "China’s Stand on UN Peacekeeping Operations:Changing Priorities of Foreign Policy" 41 (41): 39-57, 2005
• 36 Pradt, Tilman, "China’s New Foreign Policy: Military Modernisation, Multilateralism and the ‘China Threat" Palgrave Macmillan 2016
• 37 Tiezzi, Shannon, "China’s National Security Strategy"
• 38 Blasko, Dennis J, "China’s Contribution to Peacekeeping Operations:Understanding the Numbers" 16 (16): 3-7, 2016
• 39 Chung, Kiyul, "China, Russia Oppose Another Libya-type of US-led NATO Military Intervention"
• 40 Rozman, Gilbert, "Asia’s Alliance Triangle: US-Japan-South Korea Relations at Tumultuous Times" Palgrave 2015
• 41 Ikenberry, G. John, "American Hegemony and East Asian Order" 58 (58): 353-367, 2004
• 42 Jones, Lee, "ASEAN, Sovereign and Intervention in Southeast Asia" Palgrave Macmillan 2012
• 43 Simon, Sheldon, "ASEAN and Multilateralism: the Long, Bumpy Road to Community" 30 (30): 264-292, 2008
• 44 Jones, David M., "ASEAN Economic Community: a Model for Asia-wide Regional Integration" Palgrave Macmillan 11-31, 2016
• 45 김태운, "6자회담의 다자주의 실천성 검증과 다자협력기제로의 발전방안" 북한연구학회 9 (9): 1-20, 2005
• 46 김경일, "6자회담과 다자주의- 일방성과 다자성에 대한 이론적 검토를 중심으로" 6 (6): 31-55, 2003