KCI등재
개정 상법과 제반 실무관행들은 최대주주 견제와 소수주주권 보호에 효과적인가?: 감사위원 선임사례를 중심으로 = Do the Amended Commercial Act and Other Practices Check Majority Shareholder and Protect Minority Shareholders?
저자
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2022
작성언어
Korean
주제어
등재정보
KCI등재
자료형태
학술저널
발행기관 URL
수록면
197-218(22쪽)
DOI식별코드
제공처
The audit committee is a committee of the board of directors that independently monitors management. Therefore, the audit committee plays an important role in enhancing the transparency of the business environment and reliability of accounting information. Since the introduction of the audit committee system to improve corporate governance, regulators have continuously supplemented and developed related regulations. As part of these efforts, a separate election system for audit committee members were introduced to the amended Commercial Act in 2020 and other institutional supplements were made. Before the amendment, the Commercial Act required that directors be appointed through a resolution at the general meeting of shareholders before appointing the audit committee members, and the audit committee members were elected from among the appointed directors. However, the voting rights of the largest shareholder were not restricted at the stage of appointing a director, and the voting rights of the largest shareholder were restricted only when audit committee member was selected from among the appointed directors. Thus, there was a problem in that candidates for audit committee members were composed only of directors desired by the major shareholder. This reduced the independence of the audit committee and acted as a hindrance to the effective monitoring function. Accordingly, in the amended Commercial Act, when appointing audit committee members, one of the audit committee members is separated from the other directors and appointed as ‘directors who become members of the audit committee’. At this stage, voting rights of the largest shareholder were restricted. As a result, the audit committee members were able to monitor and check the management from a more independent position. In addition, the amended Commercial Act improved the corporate governance structure and established transparent management by reorganizing the rules for restricting voting rights when selecting members of the audit committee member and relieving the requirements for shareholder proposals. In this study, we examine the impact of the amended Commercial Act on the composition of audit committees in listed companies for protection of minority shareholder rights and check force of major shareholders through two case studies. In the case of Hankook & Company, it cannot be regarded as complete protection of minority shareholder rights in the sense that the amended Commercial Act was used in management dispute of the owner family. However, it is significant in that the minority shareholder played the role of a casting boat in the management dispute between the largest shareholder and the second largest shareholder, checking the largest shareholder and effectively exercising the shareholder’s rights. This case suggests the possibility that minority shareholders can have a voice in management decision as a shareholder of the company, and shows that the company must make management decisions in the direction of maximizing the value of all shareholders. In the case of Sajo Industries, although the audit committee member recommended by minority shareholders was not appointed, it showed shareholder activism of the minority shareholders’ association. This was a precedent for the protection and exercise of minority shareholder rights by showing that the shareholder proposal system under the Commercial Act and the separate election system for audit committee members are a system that actually exercises the rights of minority shareholders and contributes to checking the management. Although the amended Commercial Act is considered to have moved in the direction to check the major shareholders and protect the minority shareholders, the regulations of the amended Commercial Act can still be avoided due to the tricks of companies, so it cannot achieve complete check of the major shareholders and the protection of minority shareholders’ rights. Reflecting the imp...
더보기서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)