Robust Unit Commitment with Virtual Synchronous Renewables

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

With the increasing penetration of renewable energy sources and the consequent displacement of synchronous generators, the frequency stability of power systems deteriorates since RESs cannot participate in active power and frequency control.
By emulating the outer characteristics of SGs and deloading a controllable margin, RESs can also keep headroom and provide frequency responses. This paper focuses on incorporating virtual synchronous renewables into the unit commitment to optimize the joint scheduling of energy production and spinning reserves. First, based on the interval representation of renewable uncertainty, the renewable output is decomposed into the stochastic and dispatchable portions. The dispatchable portion, defi ned as VSRs, can keep deterministic regulation headroom and participate in power balance regulation. Second, a robust security-constrained unit commitment model is proposed to achieve optimal scheduling in face of multiple uncertainties. The fl exibility of the pumped-storage hydro station is also considered. Third, the solution strategies which linearize the nonlinear terms in the objective function and constraints are introduced. Finally, the correctness and eff ectiveness of the robust unit commitment model are tested and verifi ed in the modifi ed 39-bus system.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 Ember, "Wind and solar now generate one-tenth of global electricity global half-year electricity analysis"
• 2 Pandžić H, "Toward cost-efficient and reliable unit commitment under uncertainty" 31 (31): 970-982, 2016
• 3 Tielens P, "The Relevance of inertia in power systems" 55 : 999-1009, 2016
• 4 Teng F, "Stochastic scheduling with inertia-dependent fast frequency response requirements" 31 (31): 1557-1566, 2016
• 5 Ye Y, "Revolution of frequency regu"lation in the converter-dominated power system" 111 : 145-156, 2019
• 6 Xiangwu Yan, "Review of VSG Control-Enabled Universal Compatibility Architecture for Future Power Systems with High-Penetration Renewable Generation" MDPI AG 9 (9): 1484-, 2019
• 7 Lee J, "Releasable kinetic energy-based inertial control of a DFIG wind power plant" 7 (7): 279-288, 2016
• 8 Fernandez Blanco R, "Probabilistic security-constrained unit commitment with generation and transmission contingencies" 32 (32): 228-239, 2017
• 9 Wood AJ, "Power generation, operation, and control" Wiley 2013
• 10 L. Roald, "Optimal power flow with wind power control and limited expected risk of overloads" 2016
• 11 Conejo A, "Long-term coordination of transmission and storage to integrate wind power" 3 (3): 36-43, 2017
• 12 Kang C, "Key scientific issues and theoretical research framework for power systems with high proportion of renewable energy" 41 : 1-11, 2017
• 13 Huang H, "Joint generation and reserve scheduling of wind-solar-pumped storage power systems under multiple uncertainties" 29 (29): 1-21, 2019
• 14 AM. Massoud, "Inverter-based versus synchronous-based distributed generation; fault current limitation and protection Issues"
• 15 Lu Z, "Frequency regulation challenge of power electronics dominated Power systems and its new multilevel coordinated control framework" 52 (52): 110-, 2019
• 16 Huang H, "Exploiting the operational flexibility of wind integrated hybrid AC/DC power systems" 36 (36): 818-826, 2021
• 17 JK. Kaldellis, "Evaluating the maximum wind energy penetration limit for weak electrical grids" 2001
• 18 Weichao Zhang ; Xiangwu Yan, "Equivalence Analysis of Virtual Synchronous Machines and Frequency‑Droops for Inertia Emulation in Power Systems with Converter‑Interfaced Renewables" 대한전기학회 15 (15): 1167-1175, 2020
• 19 Jingyang Fang, "Distributed Power System Virtual Inertia Implemented by Grid-Connected Power Converters" Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 33 (33): 8488-8499, 2018
• 20 Wu Z, "Coordinated control strategy of battery energy storage system and PMSG-WTG to enhance system frequency regulation capability" 8 (8): 30-43, 2017
• 21 Vrakopoulou M, "Chance constrained reserve scheduling using uncertain controllable loads part i: formulation and scenario-based analysis" 10 (10): 1608-1617, 2019
• 22 Huang H, "An endogenous approach to quantifying the wind power reserve" 35 (35): 2431-2442, 2020
• 23 Jabr RA, "Adjustable robust OPF with renewable energy sources" 28 (28): 4742-4751, 2013
• 24 Jiang K, "A practical secondary frequency control strategy for virtual synchronous generator" 11 (11): 2734-2736, 2020
• 25 Vrakopoulou M, "A Probabilistic framework for reserve scheduling N-1 and security assessment of systems with high wind power penetration" 28 (28): 3885-3896, 2013