政策形成의 最適化를 위한 政策代案의 分析과 選定 硏究 = A Study on the Analysis and the Selection of Policy Alternatives for Optimizing Policy Formulation

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Modern government pursues policy orientation to meet the increasing needs of its people. Public policies carried out by the government have to be established rightly for their magnitude of the influence and also offer its people more benefits as well.
This paper is aimed at studying the analysis and the selection of policy alternatives for optimizing policy formulation which is achieved by the government. Optimal policy formulation could paper is discussed in various aspects.
However, this paper is mainly written from theoretical, normative standpoints.
The meaning and contents of policy analysis are dealt with in the beginning part of this paper because first of all the study and the examination of policy analysis need to optimize policy formulation. The study of policy analysis can be divided into two parts: the first part is to offer the knowledge necessary for the entire phases of policy process, while the second part for predicting and evaluating the consequences.
In considering the policy analysis, the former focuses on a broad sense, while the latter on a narrow sense.
Policy analysis can be divided into two parts: (1) policy determinants analysis where policies are treated as independent variables in policy process, (2) policy consequences analysis where policies are treated as dependent variables in that process.
And policy analysis is also divided into three forms: prospective, retrospective, integrated policy analysis classified on the basis of the flow of poly-relevant information.
Prospective policy analysis involves the production and transformation of information before policy actions are initiated and implemented.
Retrospective policy analysis is a form of policy analysis to produce and transform information after policy actions have been taken.
Integrated policy analysis is a more comprehensive from of analysis concerned with the production and transformation of information both before and after policy actions have been taken.
And then, I dealt with the analytic techniques and the selection criteria of policy alternatives for optimal policy formulation in this paper. The selection of policy alternatives-policy making-is to consciously choose the best among many alternatives in order to achieve effectively policy goal. There are various techniques in analyzing policy alternatives. In this paper I dealt with only benefit-cost analysis and decision analysis because these two techniques have been widely utilized.
After analyzing policy alternatives by various techniques, policy-maker must select policy alternative on the basis of fixed criteria.
The value-judgement of policy-maker has turned out to be involved in selecting the best alternative.
If there are no fixed criteria of selection, the possibilities that personal arbitrariness and bias may have effects on the selection of alternatives seem to be increased.
The criteria of selecting policy alternatives are largely divided into two parts: general criteria and unique criteria of every person. General criteria include teleological, nonteleological and social equity criteria.
The first is the teleological criteria that judge policies better or worse according to their consequences. The second is the nonteleological criteria that judge a policy right or wrong without considering its consequences. Social equity means that all members in society enjoy equal liberty and just equality. It involves vertical and horizontal equity. And policy maker is also influenced by political, organizational and policy value, etc..
The criteria needed for selecting policy alternatives must possess consistency, clarity, generality and clarification of the overall feasibilities of policy alternatives.
In this way, the formulated policies resulted from the above processes and stages would be more rational and effective ones.
In conclusion, we must perform the reasonable works and scientific analyses in order that the policies to be achieved by the government may meet the increasing demands of people and adapt to the changing environment. Hence, the optimizing of policy formulation to enhance the effectiveness of public policy is highly desired.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• <目次> = 147
• Ⅰ. 序 論 = 147
• Ⅱ. 政策分析의 意味와 類型 = 148
• 1. 政策過程과 政策分析 = 148
• 2. 政策分析의 意味 = 149
• 3. 政策分析의 接近方法 = 151
• 4. 政策分析의 類型 = 153
• Ⅲ. 政策代案의 分析技法과 選定基準 = 157
• 1. 代案分析과 選定基準定立의 必要 = 157
• 2. 政策代案의 分析技法 = 158
• 3. 政策代案의 選定基準 = 163
• Ⅳ. 結 論 = 168
• Abstract = 170
• 註 = 172