KCI등재
WTO ‘한국-인도네시아산 특정 종이 수입에 대한 반덤핑관세’ 사건
저자
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2005
작성언어
Korean
주제어
등재정보
KCI등재
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
151-204(54쪽)
제공처
Korea has been an active member state in WTO dispute settlements system. However, it was the first time for Korea's Anti-dumping measure to be reviewed by panel. Indonesia filed a complaint against Korea claiming that the Anti-dumping duties on imports of certain paper from Indonesia were inconsistent with the Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 ("Anti-Dumping Agreement").
Panel reviewed Indonesia' s arguments and resulted in findings which were summarized to 11 main issues. Korea won most of the issues: (ⅰ) Korea Trade Commission (hereinafter 'KTC')' s decision to disregards domestic sale information and to calculate normal values on the basis of facts available, (ⅱ) KTC' s use of constructed value to determine normal values, (ⅲ) KTC' s alleged failure to make a fair comparison between normal valued and export price, (ⅳ) KTC' s treatment of 3 companies as a single exporter, (ⅴ) KTC' s treatment of "Plain Paper Copier" and "Uncoated Wood-free Printing Paper" as like products, (ⅵ) alleged failure to abide by the Disclosure obligations contained in Article 6 of the Antidumping agreement.
However, the panel upheld Indonesia's claim partially, ruling that KTC acted inconsistently with WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement in determining margin of dumping for on Indonesian exporter, in failing to apply "special circumvention" in use of secondary source information instead of domestic sales data from two Indonesian companies, and in failing to disclose how it calculated the constructed normal value. The Panel also agreed with Indonesia that the ITC erred in its assessment of the impact of dumping Indonesian paper imports on competing Korean producers.
From a legal perspective, this case has a significant implication. The panel reversed its own interim finding that the KTC had not violated its obligation to apply special circumvention when relying on secondary sources of information for determining normal value. Along with Indonesia' s request for change, the Panel decided to review and finally reversed its finding. It was remarkable because it was the first reversal by a panel of a major substantive finding in Its interim report. As Brendan McGivern, a trade expert attorney said, there has been "a widely shared assumption that a panel' s ruling at the interim review stage on the WTO-consistency of a measure was definitive and would not be reversed in the final report." The panel's decision may encourage future dispute parties to prepare more sophisticated submission and future panels to be more attentive to requests during the interim review to revise substantive finding.
Another issue to be considered is the panel' s conclusion on how to treat related parties. The KTC treated 3 different companies as a single exporter based on a reevaluation of the relationship between them. Noting that the Article 6.10 of the Anti-Dumping Agreement did not provide specific guidance, the panel looked into the Article 9.5 which deals with new shipper reviews. The panel noted that the investigating authority was not always required to make individual margin of dumping but if it didn't make determination individually, where should be shown justification. The panel upheld that the KTC was consistent with the Anti-Dumping Agreement because various factors such as existence of cross-sale of the subject products and commonality regarding shareholding and management showed that the companies were related. The panel's conclusion appears to be rationale and coherent with Article 4.1 (i) and foot note 11 which provides how to treat related exporters and importers in defining a domestic industry.
In addition, the panel found that the 'like product' of Article 2.6 does not apply to the injury determination in this case. The panel said that there is no requirement that the two different products under consideration in the injury determination must be like each other. Simply, the like product
분석정보
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)