(An) analysis of recognition characteristics and acceptance factors on locally unwanted land use : focused on special schools for the disabled
저자
발행사항
[Seoul] : Graduate School, Yonsei University, 2018
학위논문사항
학위논문(박사) -- Graduate School, Yonsei University Department of Urban Planning and Engineering 2018.8
발행연도
2018
작성언어
영어
주제어
발행국(도시)
서울
기타서명
비선호시설 입지 인식특성 및 지여구용성 요인분석 : 장애인특수학교를 중심으로
형태사항
xviii, 192 p. : 삽화 ; 26 cm
일반주기명
지도교수: Kabsung Kim
UCI식별코드
I804:11046-000000517370
소장기관
This study was carried out with two sub-themes in the process of seeking ways to increase the local acceptance of special schools for the disabled.
The first sub-theme was to analyze the subjective recognitions of the interested parties in Gayang-dong who were in conflict with each other in relation to the establishment of a special school for the disabled. The subjective recognitions of the people were analyzed using Q methodology, and were classified into four recognition types. The characteristics of each type are as follows:
Type 1 is the group opposing the facility (active). This type is characterized by distrust of government, the initiative of residents and compensation claims. It strongly rejects the establishment itself of the special school for the disabled. This type has such a strong distrust of government (including the local government and the Ministry of Education) that they deny or discredit all administrative procedures in the establishment of the school, and maintain the position that local residents should take all initiatives in the establishment process, while strongly asking for economic compensation. In addition, recognizing the special school for the disabled as an abominable facility, Type 1 has the most negative recognition on the facility itself among the four types.
Type 2 can be explained as consenting to the facility (neutral), while placing an emphasis on proper procedure / institutional support and the need for compensation. This type of people has little negative attitude toward the establishment of a special school for the disabled, but emphasizes the importance of following the proper procedure and system in establishing the school and thinks it necessary to make compensation to the residents from a neutral viewpoint. What is noticeable is that all of the 10 persons selected from the public officials of Education Office and the experts were classified as Type 2. This has a significant implication, in that the policy executives and expert group have a neutral position that is different from that of local residents in establishing a special school for the disabled.
Type 3 can be explained with the opposition to the facility (passive) and the request for procedural/institutional supplements and compensations. Although this type opposes the establishment itself of a special school for the disabled, they have some positive opinions that the conflict can be alleviated through the process of supplementing the design plan and the use of the school, emphasizing the need for a clear system in selecting the location. This type can potentially turn into the consent group depending on how the system is supplemented, or the procedure of compensation is carried out. However, they resolutely oppose the moral approach that the special school for the disabled should be established unconditionally in the area just because it is a facility for the weak, and ask for compensation as strongly as Type 1. In that they do not want their opposing position to be known to their children and neighbors, it is a type of NIMBY tendency that has an internal discomfort with its own position.
Type 4 is the group who actively consents to the facility but requests the supplementation of the procedure/system and the compensation. They have the opinion that since the special school for the disabled is a facility for the socially weak, the local residents should gain some disadvantages from its establishment, and that the conflict can be alleviated through complementing the design plan and the use of the school. However, they think it necessary to plan the establishment of the school in consideration of regional equity, and to supplement the procedure and system so that the local residents can agree to them.
Through this analysis of the recognition characteristics of the four types, the following implications can be derived:
First, by understanding the characteristics of the opposing groups that are classified as Types 1 and 3, we may find ways to increase the acceptance of these groups. Type 1 rejects the facility itself and denies all possibilities for alleviating the conflict. Meanwhile, Type 3 has an internal conflict, in that they oppose the facility itself but recognize that the conflict can be mitigated through a complementary process at the planning stage. They commonly think that the local residents may suffer unfairly due to the establishment of the facility, so they ask for more equitable planning so as to raise the positive recognition level of the local residents in the establishment process of the facility. In addition, both types claim the compensation procedures for the area and individual residents with a rational standard in the physical and psychological respects.
Second, with the recognition characteristics of Type 2, we can understand the neutral and objective positions of the policy makers and specialists, and at the same time, their cognitive difference from local residents. The policy makers need to check their cognitive difference from the local residents and make efforts to narrow it down.
Third, through the analysis of Type 4, we can see that some supplementary efforts are necessary in order to increase the acceptance even among those who consent to the establishment of the facility. This group of people is basically favorable but still thinks it necessary to raise the regional equity, to provide compensation and to complement the procedure and system so that the local residents can sufficiently consent. It seems desirable to reflect these points in the policy.
The second sub-theme was to draw out the local acceptance factors related to the special school for the disabled and to analyze their influences. It is significant in that the recognitions on the special school for the disabled derived in the way of hypothesis creation through the Q methodology were analyzed to examine how they influenced the pros and cons of the school establishment.
To accomplish this, 34 statements with a typicality score(Z-Score) of ± 1 or greater were selected from the Q statements, and a 7-point Likert scale was used to construct the questionnaire regarding local acceptance. The questionnaire survey was conducted on 424 residents in Seoul. The 34 statements on local acceptance were classified into factors through the factor analysis, and each factor was defined using the characteristics that can commonly explain the statements constituting each factor. As a result, 6 local acceptance factors were derived: positive recognition (on the disabled people, the facilities, the plan and the procedure), negative recognition (on the disabled people, the facilities, the plan and the procedure), collection of residents' opinions, economic rewards, economic impacts, and local equity.
To analyze the influence of local acceptance factors, a structural equation model analysis was performed. As a result, the research hypothesis (H1) “The higher the positive recognition, the higher the local acceptance” turned out to be positively(+) significant, as its Beta value was 0.671(p<.001) in the parameter estimation. The hypothesis (H5) “The greater the economic impacts, the higher the local acceptance” also turned out to be positively(+) significant, as its Beta value was 0.195(p<.001) in the parameter estimation. However, with the exception of the positive recognition and the economic impacts, no other statistically significant results could be obtained. The relation between the negative recognition and the local acceptance turned out to be statistically insignificant, as its Beta value was -0.183(p>.05). The relation between the collection of residents' opinions and the local acceptance turned out to be statistically insignificant, as its Beta value was -0.02(p>.05). The relation between the economic compensation and the local acceptance was also statistically insignificant, as its Beta value was 0.034(p>.05). And the relation between the local equity and the local acceptance was also statistically insignificant, as its Beta value was 0.011(p>.05).
In this study, the hypothesis that positive recognition on the facilities and the ripple effects on the local economy can significantly raise the local acceptance on the special school for the disabled was statistically verified. This suggests that the institutional complement and the policy consideration to raise these two factors will be necessary in the future process promoting the policy.
분석정보
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)