KCI등재
AHCI
SCOPUS
PHILOSOPHICAL APORIA OF NEO-CONFUCIANISM DURING THE CHOSŎN DYNASTY = PHILOSOPHICAL APORIA OF NEO-CONFUCIANISM DURING THE CHOSŎN DYNASTY
저자
이동희 (계명대학교)
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2010
작성언어
-주제어
등재정보
KCI등재,AHCI,SCOPUS
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
75-99(25쪽)
KCI 피인용횟수
0
DOI식별코드
제공처
This study analyzes the philosophical aporia which was exposed during the debates that developed amongst Neo-Confucianists during the Chosŏn era, whose positions were based on the philosophical theory of the Zhu Xi School of Thought. Of these various debates, the present study focuses on the discussion amongst the four scholars on the topic of Sadan ch’ilchŏng (四端七情, four beginnings and seven emotions)—which includes the debate over the notion of insim tosim (人心道心, human mind and moral mind)—and the arguments over Im Sŏngju’s theory of yugiron (唯氣論, ki-holistic Cosmology).
The debates between Yi Hwang, whose penname was T’oegye, and Ki Taesŭng, whose penname was Kobong, saw Yi Hwang establish a moral theory while Ki Taesŭng argued about the structural facts around the functions of the heart or mind (心, sim). To this end, Yi Hwang introduced a moral argument, or axiological statement, in the form of the theory of sach’il hobal (四七互發論, the mutual arising of the four beginnings and seven emotions), a theory which was in turn based on notions such as those of sadan ibal (四端=理發, the four beginnings arise from principle (li)) and ch’ilchŏng kibal (七情=氣發, the seven emotions arise from material force [ki]). On the other hand, Ki Taesŭng opposed Yi’s theory, arguing that Yi’s dualistic presentation could lead to further misunder-standing. For his part, Yi Yi, whose pen name was Yulgok, inherited Ki’s perspective in his own debates with Sŏng Hon (penname Ugye). In this regard, Yi Yi argued that Yi Hwang’s theory of sach’il hobal was wrong in that while the seven emotions (ch’ilchŏng) represented the totality of human emotions, the four beginnings (sadan) were special emotions that nevertheless fell under the category of human emotions. On the other hand, Yi Yi asserted that the human mind (insim) and moral mind (tosim) were in fact interconnected, and could be mutually interchanged with one another (終始, chongsi). However, the theory of the mutual interchange between insim-tosim (終始論, chongsiron) presented as a counter-argument to the theory of the mutual arising of the four beginnings and seven emotions (sach’il hobal) can be likened to a value-based argument-ation, or moral argumentation. This was certainly contradictory, and also represented a case of philosophical aporia. This situation originated from the fact that Zhu Xi’s Thought was perceived as a thought based on natural law formed in the medieval period without a proper division of values and facts.
In his discussions about the role of human nature (inmulsŏng) in Zhu Xi’s cosmo-logical theory of li-qi (理氣論, principle and material force), Im Sŏngju whose penname was Nongmun, emphasized the fact that Zhu Xi’s notion of liyi fenshu (理一分殊, universality and particularity) was representative of the universality and particularity that existed in all the myriad of things found in the cosmos. Im possessed a perspective of cosmology (nature) which regarded the universe as being filled with ki (holistic ki of the cosmos). Im believed that while the ki (material force) of the universe moves naturally by itself, the power of life (生意, saengŭi), or what could also be referred to as the vitality of life (生命性, saengmyŏngsŏng), was involved within ki itself. As a result, Im believed that Zhu Xi’s notion of li (理, principle) was in effect unnecessary. Meanwhile, based on the original condition of material force or energy, Im identified ki (material force) as the clearness of original ki (澹一淸虛, tamil ch’ŏnghŏ). However, as ki is not static, what we are in fact seeing is the clearness vs. unclearness of ki (淸濁粹駁, ch’ŏngt’ak subak). Therefore, the original condition of ki can be perceived as little more than a form of philosophical demand. Furthermore, Im argued that i’il punsu (理一分殊, one principle and its manifoldness) was the same as ki’il punsu (氣一分殊, one energy and different shapes), and that as such the possibility could not be ruled out that Zhu Xi’s liyi fenshu (理一分殊) was in fact based on the premise of qiyi fenshu (氣一分殊). As the concept of li (理) indicates principle and ki (氣) originally indicates material force, i’il punsu (理一分殊, one principle and its manifoldness), which under the religious-philosophy of the medieval period meant sharing in the divine, is more correctly perceived as li. However, as a close relationship exists between li and ki within the metaphysical category, one cannot fully deny the veracity of the notion of ki’il punsu (氣一分殊, one energy different shapes). This is the philosophical aporia of Zhu Xi’s li-qi theory that served as the religious philosophy (metaphysics) of the Medieval Era.
분석정보
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2023 | 평가예정 | 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) | KCI등재 |
2012-02-27 | 학회명변경 | 영문명 : institute of korean studes -> Academia Koreana | KCI등재 |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | KCI등재 |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | KCI후보 |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | KCI후보 |
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.3 | 0.27 | 0.27 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.35 | 0.31 | 0.676 | 0.05 |
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)