ADR을 통한 저작권분쟁 해결에 관한 검토 = The Role of ADR in the Resolution of the Copyright Disputes

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

These days utilization of copyright in daily life and economic activities is becoming more important than ever, and IT technology is developing day by day. Along with those fact, copyright infringement and dispute is naturally increasing.
This thesis dealt with the 3 different issues of ADR on copyright.
The First part, introduce ADR system that was performed by Korea Copyright Committee according to Copyright law. This paper evaluate the committee's efforts to provide resolution of copyright disputes via conciliation was effective. So it needs to be look over several countries' ADR, beside conventional judicial remedy. And Korea's copyright conciliation system which is successfully operating also introduced. Second, In many countries, including South Korea are take advantage of conciliation as the way to settle down the dispute over copyright. Furthermore, looked over if we can use arbitration as tool to settle dispute or not. Currently in Korea, patent dispute is handled by Industrial Property Dispute Conciliation Committee(The Invention Promotion Act Ch.5) and Layout-design Review and Mediation Committee(The Act on the Layout-designs of Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Art.29-34), but using performance of those two committee is still too low. In comparison, the copyright committee, a affiliation organization of the ministry of culture, sports and tourism has much more result in conciliation compare with patent dispute. Copyright disputes has arbitrability of it's subject-matter and many regulating organs are interested in it.(especially, binding of arbitral award and final resolution). Take advantage of both conciliation and arbitration could be good way to resolve copyright disputes. Third, the writer look at the proposal on the creation of Northeast Regional Center for Intellectual Property ADR. Because of the nature of copyright and rapid development of internet technology, international use of work become more frequent and accordingly infringement cases are increasing. The role of commercial arbitration regimes and institutions which has progressed significantly worldwide level, but which has only just begun in the intellectual property ADR area, leads also to a clash of often very different legal cultures and protection in a market economy. International cooperation in regional area with conflict interests becomes an important alternative. But it will depend on the building of regional institutions and mechanisms. The feasibility of this proposal and preconditions were examined. Establishment of new international organization requires a lot of time, cost and efforts. And risk of failure is much too high. Therefore factual, statistical review should be preceded. In addition, technical measures, such as on-line arbitration is necessary to review also. Furthermore in order to establish new organization, the relative law, legal environment, public sentiment and international compliance must be carefully considered with factual review about the needs and economic benefits of each country Yet on complex regulatory matters such as IP and ADR, a great deal of the potential benefits from international standards arises not from the international legal framework nor even the formal content of national legislation, but from the informed and effective use made of the possibilities within the system, including by policymakers and regulators.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 김석철, "한국중재의 영역확대 방안에 관한연구" 한국중재학회 20 (20): 47-69, 2010
• 2 안건형, "한국의 엔터테인먼트산업과 중재의 현황과 과제 - 한국의 연예매니지먼트 사업을 중심으로 -" 법학연구원 문화.미디어.엔터테인먼트법연구소 4 (4): 129-153, 2010
• 3 김상호, "한ㆍ중ㆍ일 3국의 동북아 ADR 협력에 관한 고찰" 2011
• 4 서달주, "프랑스 저작권법" 한국저작권위원회 2009
• 5 김석철, "특허중재제도의 도입 및 실시방안에 관한 연구" 한양대 1985
• 6 김선정, "특허법상 강제실시와 ‘비교형량’의 문제점"
• 7 강수미, "징벌적 손해배상의 중재적격" 한국중재학회 21 (21): 3-32, 2011
• 8 김선정, "직무발명관련 법령의 통일적 정비 및 대체적 분쟁해결시스템 도입방안에 관한 연구" 특허청 2005
• 9 김선정, "증거주의와 연구노트" 한국지식재산연구원 2010
• 10 서헌제, "중재에 의한 컴퓨터 프로그램분쟁의 해결" (314) : 2004
• 11 손승우, "중재에 의한 S/W 분쟁해결" 2 (2): 2005
• 12 김정현, "중국저작권법(상)" 법영사 2008
• 13 차경자, "중국의 온라인중재 운용과 법적문제에 관한 연구 - CIETAC의 온라인중재를 중심으로" 한국중재학회 20 (20): 131-150, 2010
• 14 정용균, "중국에서의 상사중재판정 집행에 관한 동향과 제도개선 연구 : 외국투자자 관점을 중심으로" 한국중재학회 20 (20): 133-167, 2010
• 15 김선정, "중국에 있어서 외국중재판정의 승인 및 집행 거절 사유인 공서와 법의 지배" 한국중재학회 18 (18): 23-50, 2008
• 16 허회성, "저작권심의조정위원회 조정제도의 개선방안에 대한 연구" 문화관광부 2003
• 17 한국저작권위원회, "저작권분쟁조정사례집"
• 18 윤선희, "일본에서 특허의 유효성에 대한 중재가능성-킬비 판결(일본 특허법 제104조의3)을 중심으로-" 한국중재학회 21 (21): 57-72, 2011
• 19 유병현, "우리나라ADR의 발전방향" (22) : 2006
• 20 김선정, "우리나라 금융분야 ADR의 개선방안" 한국중재학회 2011
• 21 김선정, "온라인 상사분쟁해결방법의 법적 과제" 한국경영법률학회 17 (17): 561-599, 2006
• 22 강용찬, "소비자중재합의의 효력에 관한 미국 법원의 태도와 함의" 한국중재학회 21 (21): 73-86, 2011
• 23 하충룡, "소비자중재합의의 미국계약법상 항변" 한국중재학회 20 (20): 151-172, 2010
• 24 목영준, "상사중재법론" 박영사 2000
• 25 표호건, "산업재산권분쟁에 관한 재판외분쟁해결제도-산업재산권분쟁조장제도의 활성화 방안을 중심으로" 한국발명진흥회 지적재산권연구센터 1999
• 26 김희철, "미국의 증권중재제도에 관한 소고 - 공정성 요건을 중심으로 -" 한국중재학회 18 (18): 51-69, 2008
• 27 심영, "미국에 있어서의 소송대체적 분쟁해결제도- 증권분쟁을 중심으로 -" 한국비교사법학회 11 (11): 531-565, 2004
• 28 윤선희, "문화콘텐츠산업에서의 분쟁실태와 중재의 활용방안" (여름) : 2005
• 29 박영길, "동북아 지식재산권분쟁해결을 위한 ADR센터의 필요성에 관하여" 4 (4): 2009
• 30 김상호, "동북아 역내의 사적 분쟁 해결을 위한 공동기구 설립방안" 9 (9): 2003
• 31 강수미, "독점규제법 관련분쟁의 중재의 대상적격" 한국중재학회 20 (20): 41-65, 2010
• 32 김선정, "국가발전을 위한 지식재산 전략 국제세미나 자료집"
• 33 菊池武, "著作權法の基礎" 經濟産業調査會 2005
• 34 Matthias LEISTNER, "著作權における經濟學的調査の寄與-現狀の調査と學際的な理論の描寫" (29) : 2010
• 35 章忠信, "臺灣著作權法逐條解說" 經濟産業調査會 2008
• 36 澤井啓, "知的財産紛爭の仲裁ㆍADR" 8 : 2006
• 37 伊藤眞, "民事訴訟法" 有斐閣 2005
• 38 澤田壽夫, "國際的紛爭解決の手段としての調停と他の仲裁代替手法" 中央大學出版部 2007
• 39 小島武司, "國際商事仲裁の太平洋地域モデルの可能性 In 知的財産權の現代的課題-本間崇先生還曆記念" 信山社 1995
• 40 射手失好雄, "中國經濟六法" 日本國際貿易促進協會 2011
• 41 IPトレーディングㆍジャパン株式會社, "中國知的財産管理實務ハンドブック" 2006
• 42 金祥洙, "アメリカにおける知的財産權紛爭の仲裁可能性 In 現代仲裁法の論点" 有斐閣 1998
• 43 小野昌延, "アジア諸國の知的財産制度―山上和則先生古稀記念" 靑林書院 2010
• 44 Anthony Connerty, "The Role of ADR in the Resolution of International Disputes" 12 : 1996
• 45 Daniel Schimmel, "Resolving International Intellectual Property Disputes in Arbitration" 21 (21): 2009
• 46 鈴木基宏, "Q&A著作權法" 靑林書院 2011
• 47 Karl-Heinz Böckstiegel, "Public Policy and Arbitrability" Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers 1987
• 48 Jingzhou Tao, "Problems and new developments in the enforcement of intellectual property rights in China" Paul Torremans,Intellectual Property and TRIPS Compliance in China,Edward Elgar 2007
• 49 Stephen J. Ware, "Principles of Alternative Dispute Resolution, 2nd ed" Thomson West 2007
• 50 Edward Brunet, "Arbitration Law in America: A Critical Assessment" Cambridge University Press 2006
• 51 Jingzhou Tao, "Arbitration Law and Practice in China" Kluwer Law International 2004