우리나라 명승 지정 확대방안 연구 : 한국과 일본 명승자원 유형분석을 중심으로

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Although Scenic Site System of South Korea introduced in 1933 during the rule of Japan went through several systematic changes such as enactment of the Cultural Properties Protection Act, there has been no substantial changes in the contents.
However, the number of scenic sites in South Korea is only 21 as of October 2007 in spite of its long systematic tradition. Comparing with the number of scenic sites in Japan and North Korea, the number is extremely small, and furthermore, the situation is the same for the number of natural monument and historic site.
The current study aims to examine the entire scenic site system and suggest systematic problem and improvement measures focusing on expansion measures by studying the definition and concept of scenic site, relevant laws and the development of scenic site. In addition, it classified scenic sites and revealed excellence and richness of scenic site resources through comparing scenic sites and scenic site resources in South Korea and Japan by type. It also aims to suggest various methods for expanding designation of scenic site. The study results are as follows;
First of all, scenic site in Korea can be defined as 'natural objects, or natural phenomena or combination of nature and civilization achieved by the history of nature and the history of human being that have excellent artistic, scenic and academic values or are famous.'
Second, the definition of scenic site in the Cultural Properties Protection Act is 'scenic sites (or picturesque places) that have greate artistic, decorative and academic values or are famous', which is considered desirable to be revised.
Third, it is required to revise criteria to designate scenic site in the enforcement regulations of the Cultural Properties Protection Act. It will be desirable to provide an overall explanation about scenic site in the beginning part, then classify types of scenic sites into natural scenic site and historical·cultural scenic site, and make a list of representative and similar types together according to detailed types such as mountain, sea and lake.
Fourth, although the number of scenic sites in South Korea is only 21 at the present, it is necessary to promptly designate various types of scenic sites since there are a lot of excellent scenic sites, and for this, administrative support such as expansion of an organization in charge of affairs related with scenic site is needed.
Fifth, natural scenic site and historical·cultural scenic site should be designated in proper proportion. In addition, righteous understanding of scenic site, expansion of designation, and diversification and activation of policies regarding preservation and use of scenic site should be promoted.
Sixth, effective ways for expanding designation of scenic sites will be designating representative types of natural scenic site and historical·cultural scenic site above all, stabilizing policies related with designation of scenic site, and pursuing diversification by additionally designating subdivided types of scenic sites.
Seventh, active designation of focal landscape is required. It is expected that those focal landscape will play an important role in expanding designation of scenic site.
Eighth, discovery of unique scenic site types like garden type in Japan and intensive designation of them are necessary.
Ninth, among natural monument or historic site, things with value as scenic site should be discovered, and reclassified or designated as scenic sites. For this, flexible thoughts for duplicate designation of cultural properties is required.
Tenth, as for preservation, management and use of scenic site, reasonable use should be actively introduced rather than the principle of strict maintenance of the original form, which is expected to be helpful for expanding designation of scenic site.
Eleventh, it is necessary to have scenic site type cultural properties actively designated as cultural properties designated by provinces and cities by promptly proceeding with expansion of designation of scenic sites, state-designated cultural properties.
Twelfth, it is needed to designate excellent resources with great scenes and meaning as registered cultural properties in spite of artificial formation since recent times.
In order to expand designation of scenic sites in South Korea, sufficient understanding of scenic site as national heritage, and necessity and importance of designation of scenic site should be shared as well as systematic improvement. Various types of scenic sites should be designated on the basis of the above so that beautiful images of the land can be revealed as a land of picturesque rivers and mountains and the scenic site can be established as national heritage. At the same time, natural expansion of designation of scenic site is expected through implementing policies regarding preservation, management and use of scenic sites established considering their practical use.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 목 차
• ABSTRACT(영문요약)
• List of Table(표목차) = ⅰ
• List of Figure(그림목차) = ⅱ
• List of Photo(사진목차) = ⅲ
• Ⅰ. 서 론 = 1
• 1. 연구의 배경 및 목적 = 1
• 2. 연구의 대상 및 방법 = 4
• 2-1. 연구대상 = 4
• 2-2. 연구방법 = 6
• 3. 연구사 = 8
• Ⅱ. 이론적 고찰 = 10
• 1. 명승의 정의와 개념 = 10
• 1-1. 명승의 정의 = 10
• 1-2. 명승의 개념 = 12
• 2. 명승의 관련 법제 = 16
• 2-1. 명승의 관련 제도 = 16
• 2-2. 명승의 지정 기준 = 19
• 2-3. 명승의 보호 관리 = 22
• 3. 소 결 = 23
• Ⅲ. 명승의 발전과정 = 27
• 1. 일제강점기 명승 제도 도입 이전 = 27
• 2. 문화재보호법 제정 이전 = 32
• 3. 문화재보호법 제정 이후 = 37
• 4. 소 결 = 39
• Ⅳ. 명승자원의 유형 분석 = 42
• 1. 명승자원의 유형과 분석기준 = 42
• 2. 명승자원의 유형별 지정·분포 특성 = 47
• 3. 명승자원의 유형별 세부특성 = 57
• 3-1. 자연명승 = 57
• 3-1-1. 산의 명승 = 57
• 3-1-2. 바다 명승 = 68
• 3-1-3. 강의 명승 = 75
• 3-1-4. 호소 명승 = 76
• 3-1-5. 동물·식물 명승 = 80
• 3-1-6. 지하 명승 = 84
• 3-1-7. 바위 명승 = 86
• 3-1-8. 전망지 명승 = 88
• 3-2. 역사문화명승 = 91
• 3-2-1. 정원 명승 = 91
• 3-2-2. 생활 명승 = 94
• 3-2-3. 전래 명승 = 99
• 3-2-4. 국토지리 명승 = 102
• 3-2-5. 고적 명승 = 103
• 4. 소 결 = 105
• Ⅴ. 결 론 = 110
• 참고문헌 = 114
• 부 록 = 118
• 1. 한국 명승자원 현황 = 118
• 2. 일본 명승자원 현황 = 140