1960년대 여성 평문(評文) 연구 : ‘현대성’ 양상을 중심으로 = The study of female criticism in the 1960s:Center on the 'modernity'

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The concerning manuscript has the purpose of defining the form of female critiques of the 1960s has used according to social era, culture phenomenon, of the overall literature in the aspect of modernity. After the military government was established through the 4.19revolution and 5.16pithecanthrope, the modernity of the 60s of our society proceeds. This thesis states the discovery of the implication of social and aesthetic of critical literature from, or according to the social era. Especially in the 1960s, professional female writers who received literature education wrote actively, this season was when the early female literature critiques made their debut. They focused on the flow of the critiques in that era, but corrected the light critical remarks and the absent of critiques of female literature. They also commented on women issues with basis on individual experience but on more reasonable form of thinking. Through this course, they showed the female urge to change the literature and social reality. Depending solely on world travel and foreign logic may be a problem in terms of clarifying the modernity of Korean female criticism. However, the purpose can be found on transferring the shallow petit bourgeois to mature citizens, and fulfilling both system of critical theory and aesthetic independence. Compared to the male critiques who reviewed on independence of Korean literature and sovereignty of social modernity, the female critiques promotes enlightenment of the ego and female independence. The women before this time was looked upon as the 'other' in the literature world as well as the society and home, the revolution against sexual discrimination was the main task. Therefore, the female criticisms in the 60s creates an intellectual basis to criticize the republic of literary critics through establishing the new thinking called 'modernity.' This achievement is resulted from the fruit of the independence movements in the critique society. In conclusion, the republic criticism in the 60s attempted to fulfill the requirement to achieve regeneration of social and literary modernity and in this aspect, the point in question was in common between the men and women critiques.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 서론
• 2. 사회비평; 새로운 시·공간의식
• 3. 문학비평; 아카데미시즘의 미학적 규범성
• 4. 여성비평; 자기성찰과 주체적 사회화
• 5. 결론
• 참고 문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 권성우, "횡단과 경계" 소명출판 2008
• 2 위르겐 하버마스, "현대성의 철학적 담론" 문예출판사 1994
• 3 강인숙, "한국현대작가론" 동화출판공사 1971
• 4 임영봉, "한국현대비평사론" 역락 2000
• 5 김윤식, "한국현대문학사" 일지사 1976
• 6 로버트 터커, "칼 마르크스의 철학과 신화" 한길사 1982
• 7 "주간성대"
• 8 "일간신문"
• 9 "이대학보"
• 10 알렉상드르 꼬제브, "역사와 현실 변증법" 한벗 1981
• 11 전숙희, "여수상 간디" 국제문화사 1966
• 12 "여성잡지(女像, 女苑)"
• 13 강인숙, "언어로 그린 연륜" 동화출판공사 1976
• 14 "숙대월보"
• 15 정충량, "수문장의 변" 학원출판사 1977
• 16 "성대신문"
• 17 "서울대학보"
• 18 전숙희, "밀실의 문을 열고" 국민문고사 1969
• 19 이선영, "민족문학과 근대성" 문학과지성사 1995
• 20 정충량, "문명의 얼굴, 미개의 얼굴" 학원출판사 1977
• 21 황종연, "모더니티란 무엇인가" 민음사 1994
• 22 박현숙, "막은 오르는데" 창조사 1970
• 23 김향안, "마로니에의 노래" 정음문화사 1985
• 24 야우스, "도전으로서의 문학사" 문학과지성사 1983
• 25 "대학신문"
• 26 "기관지(女性)"
• 27 전혜린, "그리고 아무말도 하지 않았다" 민서출판사 1982
• 28 박정애, "‘여류’의 기원과 정체성; 50․60년대 여성문학 연구" 한국학술정보(주) 2006
• 29 조흡, "21세기 사회학의 비전을 제시한 앤서니 기든스" (10) : 1999
• 30 강소연, "1960년대 사회와 비평문학의 모더니티" 역락 2006
• 31 권성우, "1960년대 비평에 나타난 ‘현대성’ 연구" 1999
• 32 "1960년대 발간된 종합지"
• 33 강소연, "1950년대 여성잡지에 표상된 미국문화와 여성담론" 상허학회 18 : 74-93, 2006