동태적 역량을 기반으로 한 나노기술 기업의 유형 분류 및 분석 모델 개발 = An Exploratory Study on the Classification of Nano-tech Companies from the Dynamic Capabilities Perspective

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper delineates dynamic capabilities, which can be measured by internal capability and external knowledge, and also, in the shape of dynamic capabilities,bases on that corporate actions are expatiated by fitness and rent of evolutionary perspective.
To achieve the goal of this study, classifying types of Nano-technology enterprise and suggesting analytical pattern based on dynamic capabilities, this thesis substantially analyzes how to categorize a type of enterprise and gauge a result through a survey of 359 domestic companies producing goods concerned with Nano-technology.
This paper analyzes whether or not the internal capability and external knowledge affect the outcome of a certain enterprise. Moreover, in according to the results of practical analysis, it deducts 2 new variables by applying principal component analysis on four previous variables showing the internal capability and external knowledge. By classifying four types of enterprises with criterion of these two factors based on a relative extent and comparing each typical financial result, this paper suggests that the companies with relatively higher level of the internal capability and external knowledge surpass the lower ones at the financial outcome. Not only this, but also the technology-level analysis shows the same result, the higher capability and knowledge the higher performance. However, the analysis based on the difference of the four types of financial outcomes reveals that technological and evolutionary fitness can determine financial achievement.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 기업의 내부역량(Internal Capability)과 외부지식(External knowledge)을 통해 기업의 동태적 역량을 측정할 수 있으며, 동태적 역량이라는 틀에서 보면 기업의 행위를진화적 관점의 적합도(Fitness)와 렌트(Rent)로 설명할 수 있다는 점에서 착안하고 있다.
본 연구의 목적은 동태적 역량을 기반으로 나노기술 기업의 유형분류 및 분석 모델을 제시하고자함이며, 이를 위해 나노기술 분야와 관련된 제품생산 활동을 하고 있는 국내 359개기업에 대한 설문조사를 바탕으로 기업의 유형을 어떻게 분류하고, 성과를 측정하게 되는지를 실증적으로 분석하고 있다.
기업의 내부역량(Internal Capability)과 외부지식(External knowledge)이 기업의 성과에영향을 주는가를 분석하였다. 또한 실증분석 결과를 바탕으로 내부역량과 외부지식을 나타내는 4개 변수들을 주성분 분석(Principal Component Analysis)하여 2개의 새로운 변수들을도출하였다. 내부역량과 외부지식의 상대적 정도를 기준으로 4개의 기업군을 분류하고, 유형별 재무적 성과를 비교한 결과 내부역량과 외부지식이 높은 기업이 낮은 기업보다 평균적으로 재무적 성과가 높은 것으로 나타났다. 기술수준 분석의 결과도 내부역량과 외부지식 수준이 높은 기업이 상대적으로 높은 기술수준을 보였다. 그러나 4가지 유형의 재무적 성과차이를 분석한 결과는 기술적 적합도와 진화적 적합도의 상호작용에 의해 재무적 성과가 결정될수 있음을 보여주고 있다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 송재용, "전략적 제휴를 통한 지식의 이전 : 하이테크 산업에서의 아시아기업의 전략적 제휴에 관한 연구" 한국전략경영학회 10 (10): 1-18, 2007
• 2 유재홍, "산업진화단계와 동태적역량에 따른 제품혁신 전략의 변화: 한국 무선인터넷 산업을 중심으로" 기술경영경제학회 18 (18): 253-288, 2010
• 3 이광호, "나노기업의 정밀실태 및 기술혁신 활동 조사ㆍ분석 보고서" 과학기술정책연구원 2012
• 4 이주관, "기업의 지식자원이 혁신과 경영 성과에 미치는 영향 분석" 서울대학교 대학원 2012
• 5 Rosenberg, N., "the Black Box: Technology and Economics" Cambridge University Press 1982
• 6 Nelson RR., "Why do firms differ, and how does it matter?" 12 (12): 61-74, 1991
• 7 Rumelt, R. P., "Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm"In R. B. Lamb(ed. ), Competitive Strategic Management" Prentice Hall 556-570, 1984
• 8 Pernrose E., "The theroy of the growth of the firm" Basil Blackwell 1959
• 9 Shapiro, C., "The theory of business strategy" 20 (20): 125-137, 1989
• 10 Nelson, R., "The evolution of competitive or comparative advantage: A preliminary report on a study" International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis 1996
• 11 Gomez, J, "The effect of financial constraints, absorptive capacity and complementarities on the adotion of multiple process technologies" 38 : 106-119, 2009
• 12 Vega-Jurado, J, "The effect of external and internal factors on firms' product innovation" 37 : 616-632, 2008
• 13 Kim, L, ., "The dynamics of Samsung’s technological learning in semiconductors" 39 (39): 86-100, 1997
• 14 Mason, E., "The current state of the monopoly problem in the U. S" 62 : 1265-1285, 1949
• 15 Prahalad CK, "The core competence of the corporation" 68 (68): 79-91, 1990
• 16 Teece, D. J., "The Multinational Corporation and the Resource Cost of International Technology Transfer" Ballinger 1976
• 17 Peteraf M., "The Conerstones of Competitive Advantage : A Resource-Based View" 14 (14): 179-191, 1993
• 18 Williamson OE., "Strategy research : Gocernace and competence perspectives" 20 (20): 1087-1108, 1999
• 19 Grimpe, C., "Search Patterns and absorptive capacity : Low-and high-technology sectors in European countries" 38 : 495-506, 2009
• 20 Lane, P. J., "Relative Absorptive Capacity and Interorganizational Learning" 19 : 461-477, 1998
• 21 Teece, D. J., "Profiting from technological innovation" 15 (15): 285-305, 1986
• 22 Mosakowski E, "Predicting rent generation in competence-based competition, In Competency-based Strategic Management" Willey 65-85, 1997
• 23 Newbert, S. L., "New Firm Formation : A Dynamic Capability Perspective" 43 (43): 55-77, 2005
• 24 Kazt, M, "Network externalities, competition and compatibility" 75 : 424-440, 1985
• 25 Wooldridge, J. M., "More on Using Logarithmic Functional Forms, In Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach" South-Western Pub 191-, 2013
• 26 Henderson R, "Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research" 15 (15): 69-84, 1994
• 27 Song, J., "Learning-by-hiring : When is mobility useful?" 49 : 351-365, 2003
• 28 Helfat, C. E., "Know-How and Asset Complementarity and Dynamic Capability Accumulation : The case of R&D" 18 (18): 339-360, 1997
• 29 Priem Rl, "Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research?" 26 (26): 22-40, 2001
• 30 Mowery, D. C., "Inward technology transfer and competitiveness : The role of national innovation systems" 19 : 67-93, 1995
• 31 Caloghirou, Y., "Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources : complements or substitutes for innovative performance?" 24 (24): 39-39, 2004
• 32 Bain, J. S., "Industrial Organization" Wiley 1959
• 33 D’Aveni RA., "Hypercompetition : Managing the Dynamics of strategic Maneuvering" Free Press 1994
• 34 Kim, L,, "From imitation to innovation : The dynamics of Korea’s technological learning" Harvard Business School Press 1997
• 35 Xia, T., "From capability to connectivity-Absorptive capacity and exploratory alliances in biopharmaceutical firms : A US-Europe comparison" 28 : 776-785, 2008
• 36 Barney JB., "Firm Resources and sustained competitive advantage" 17 : 99-120, 1991
• 37 Szuianski, G., "Exploring internal stickness : Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm" 17 : 27-43, 1996
• 38 Teece, D. J., "Explicating Dynamic Capabilities : The Nature and Microfoundations of(Sustainable)Enterprise Performance" 28 (28): 1319-1350, 2007
• 39 Teece, D. J., "Economics of scope and the scope of an enterprise" 1 : 223-247, 1980
• 40 Hausman, J., "Econometric Models for Count Data with an Application to the Patents-R & D Relationship" 52 (52): 909-938, 1984
• 41 Wang, C. L., "Dynamic capabilities : a review and research agenda" 9 (9): 31-51, 2007
• 42 Eisenhardt, K. M., "Dynamic Capabilities: What Are They?" 21 (21): 1105-1121, 2000
• 43 Teece, D. J., "Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management" 19 (19): 509-533, 1997
• 44 Deeds, D, "Dynamic Capabilities and New Product Development in High Technology Ventures : An Empirical Analysis of New Biotechnology Firms" 15 : 211-229, 1999
• 45 Helfat, C., "Dynamic Capabilities : Understanding Strategic change in Organizations" Blackwell 2007
• 46 Zollo, M., "Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities" 13 (13): 339-351, 2002
• 47 Kim, C., "Creating new tehcnology through alliances : An empirical investigation of joint patents" 27 : 461-470, 2007
• 48 Leonard-Barton, D., "Core capabilities and core rigidities : a paradox in managing new product development" 13 : 111-125, 1992
• 49 Porter, M. E., "Competitive Advantage" Free Press 1980
• 50 Dierickx, I., "Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage" 35 : 1504-1511, 1989
• 51 Nieto, M., "Absorptive capacity, technological opportunity, knowledge spillovers, and innovative effort" 25 : 1141-1157, 2005
• 52 Stock, G. N., "Absorptive capacity and new product development" 12 : 77-91, 2001
• 53 Zahra, S. A., "Absorptive capacity : a review, reconceptualization, and extension" 27 (27): 185-203, 2002
• 54 Cohen, W., "Absorptive Capacity : A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation" 35 : 128-152, 1990
• 55 Wernerfelt B., "A resource based view of the firm" 5 (5): 171-180, 1984
• 56 Flury, B., "A first Course in Multivariate Statistics" Springer 1997