중앙정부의 행정기관위원회의 현황과 개선방향

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Republic of the Committee, that our country as many governmental system installed in the committee to make improvements, and has been recognized as an important part of the public administration Efforts have been steady progress. Audit and inspection that are actually held annually on items related to the committee in question has been a regular menu. The work by 2015 as a result of sluggish easily adopt a system for the signal to readjust to know the individual the Committee"s information and explain the self-diagnostics or Accordingly, the Commission and the establishment of a plan for readjustment, reflecting the advisory opinion of experts who sought the maintenance is can be assessed to move its own.
Improvement of the central government administrative committee system the basic Council repealed the staff and budgets is unnecessary. First, conflicted interests between social groups of private and the market, Maybe it was inevitable, and autonomy to make binding decisions even when the committee are about not asking as a committee with authority, the adjustment shall be convened in association only. Care on the market, conflicted interests profit and even if you need to deal with the government, according to law and principles, not try to be dealt with in accordance with needs And processed must realize the rule of law.
And the National Assembly is the Commission even when it is necessary for the establishment of a committee in order to control and inefficiency of the workforce and operations committee formation of the workforce, budget completely controlled. In other words administrative court of the organizations installed without limitation, the Commission in the number of Commissioners or officials, and shall be protected by the Government Organization Act down must be done. To be established by Presidential Order also need new workforce, work and budgets are monitored by the National Assembly of the Advisory Committee and, unnecessary to be abolished by the National Assembly of the Advisory Committee"s recommendations do to you.
And the central administration institutions, compared with rights or influence, many of the committee faithfully don"t disclosed the decision-making process of social surveillance, away from criticism. Attended public status and acceptance and write the minutes of the meeting on transparency in the running of last year investigating the regulatory examination, which affects the Minimum Wage Council majority of the population or in the form of a summary of summarizing and Regulatory Reform committee, to handle proceedings can not see a detailed discussion process of tidying up. The general public really necessary procedures are operating with very closed, including not forthcoming, measures to enhance transparency and accountability in the running of government commission.
Therefore, more than just advice, and read and the transparency of a mandated government endorsed the Commission to strengthen transparency and accountability of operations and creating on related laws and an executive order proceedings all the records and proceedings by individual lawmakers, compulsory public statements to the level of preparation, meeting minutes after the end of the meeting of the rapid release, civil government committee, Elite should make it the attended meeting, guarantee an opportunity, etc.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 행정기관위원회의 근거 및 현황
• Ⅲ. 행정기관위원회의 문제점과 개선방안
• Ⅳ. 결론
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 김해원, "헌법상 대통령의 겸직금지에 관한 고찰 - ‘국가과학기술위원회 개편방안’을 중심으로 -" 한양법학회 25 (25): 105-129, 2014
• 2 홍성수, "지방자치단체 인권위원회 제도에 관한 고찰 - 서울특별시 인권위원회를 중심으로 -" 법학연구소 26 (26): 93-138, 2015
• 3 나채준, "정부조직법상 행정위원회제도의 문제점에 대한 재검토" 법학연구소 14 (14): 335-365, 2013
• 4 김상겸, "정부자문위원회에 관한 헌법적 연구" 한국헌법학회 11 (11): 277-305, 2005
• 5 김동련, "정부위원회제도의 법리적 검토" 한국토지공법학회 52 : 425-444, 2011
• 6 이종수, "정부위원회의 효율적 운용방안"
• 7 국회입법조사처, "정부위원회의 현황과 개선방향" 2015
• 8 권용수, "정부위원회의 조직개편방향" 국회 입법조사처 2007
• 9 김정해, "정부위원회의 운영 및 관리상의 문제점과 개선방안" 2006
• 10 김철, "정부위원회 제도 정비의 정치경제학 –정부위원회 조직 개혁의 분석과 평가" 2003
• 11 김명환, "정부위원회 분류체계의 재정립을 통한 유형화" 사회과학연구원 35 (35): 1-26, 2009
• 12 이성환, "인권법의 과제와 인권위원회의 위상" 한국헌법학회 6 (6): 2000
• 13 吳台錫, "위원회제의 실태와 개선방안에 관한 연구 : 인천직할시를 중심으로" 서울대학교 행정대학원 1986
• 14 정홍익, "위원회제도를 중심으로 한 시민참여의 활성화" 25 (25): 1991
• 15 정혜욱, "방송통신심의위원회의 시정요구에 대한 행정법적 고찰 - 행정주체론과 행정지도론을 중심으로 -" 법학연구소 (57) : 53-83, 2012
• 16 명재진, "미국 공무원제도와 공무원 기본권" 미국헌법학회 19 (19): 111-143, 2008
• 17 이광윤, "독립행정청의 법적 성격― 금융감독위원회를 중심으로 ―" 행정법이론실무학회(行政法理論實務學會) 9 : 5-206, 2003
• 18 김소연, "독립행정기관의 헌법적 체계화에 관한 연구- 중앙행정기관으로서의 독립위원회를 중심으로 -" 법조협회 62 (62): 5-52, 2013
• 19 조소영, "독립규제위원회의 전문성 제고를 위한 시스템에 관한 연구 - 방송통신위원회의 기능과 역할을 중심으로 -" 한국비교공법학회 10 (10): 475-500, 2009
• 20 김호정, "대통령 소속 위원회 운영과 행정조직법정주의" 법학연구소 (27) : 501-525, 2007
• 21 박찬운, "국제인권법으로 본 국가인권위원회의 의의와 독립성" 법학연구소 26 (26): 85-102, 2009
• 22 李寬熙, "국가인권위원회의 현황과 발전방향― 특히 경찰권과의 관계를 중심으로 ―" 한국공법학회 31 (31): 10-10, 2003
• 23 문성식, "국가인권위원회의 독립성에 관한 연구" 고려대학교 대학원 2012
• 24 박영범, "국가인권위원회에 관한 법적 연구 : 조사 및 권고작용을 중심으로" 서울시립대학교 대학원 2010
• 25 홍대식, "공정거래법 집행자로서의 공정거래위원회의 역할과 과제-행정입법에 대한 검토를 소재로" 법학연구소 52 (52): 173-202, 2011
• 26 Robert E. Cushman, "The Independent Regulatory Commission" Octagon Books 1971
• 27 Manning, John F., "Separation of Powers as Ordinary Interpretation" 124 : 1939-, 2010