의사표시의 진술을 구하는 소송의 소의 이익 –대판 2016. 9. 30. 2016다200552 –· = A Case Study on the Interest of Action to Request for Declaration of Intention·

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The precedent taken up in this study is that request for declaration of intention is interpreted as having no interest of action. It can be said that this case is judgment based on common sense. This is because the court does not have to make a judgment on this matter unless there is any interest in the winning judgment that plaintiff obtains. This study is considering an exceptional interpretation of the case that there is no interest of action in this request. The order of discussion first analyzes judicial precedents. Next, I introduce the theory and then write my opinion with reference to Japanese precedents and theories with a similar judicial system.
It is difficult to agree with the interpretation that the case should be dismissed because there is no actual benefit in action for performance. That the court pre-paid an action for reasons interest of action is not useful for the growth of people's rights. Whether or not such claim right is profitable should, in principle, be left to the parties as an subject merit problem. In conclusion this study presented a conclusion against the interpretation of the case.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 민일영, "주석 민사소송법(Ⅳ)" 한국사법행정학회 2012
• 2 이시윤, "신민사소송법" 박영사 2017
• 3 법원행정처, "법원실무제요 민사소송[Ⅱ]" 2014
• 4 김홍엽, "민사소송법 제6판" (주)박영사 2016
• 5 송상현, "민사소송법" 박영사 2014
• 6 정동윤, "민사소송법" 법문사 2016
• 7 호문혁, "민사소송법" 법문사 2016
• 8 김정현, "등기부의 폐쇄와 그 권리회복(2)" 1980
• 9 박종민, "근저당권의 이전에 물상보증인의 동의 요부와 부기등기만의 말소를 구할소의 이익에 관하여," (54) : 2006
• 10 高橋宏志, "重点講義民事訴訟法" 有斐閣 2000
• 11 谷口安平, "講座民事訴訟② 訴訟の提" 弘文堂 1984
• 12 斎藤秀夫, "注解民事訴訟法(6)" 第一法規 1993
• 13 三ヶ月章, "民事訴訟法(法律学全集)" 有斐閣 1970
• 14 兼子一, "条解民事訴訟法" 弘文堂 2011
• 15 兼子一, "新修民事訴訟法体系" 酒井書店 1972
• 16 谷口安平, "判例評釋" 55 (55): 1976
• 17 秋山幹男, "コンメンタール民事訴訟法Ⅲ" 日本評論社 2008