퇴계 사단칠정론(四端七情論)의 수양론적 고찰-정심공부(正心工夫)를 중심으로- = A Study of Toegye`s four Beginnings and Seven Feelings from the Perspective of the Self-Cultivation Theory-based on The Study on Rectifying the Mind-

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper, based on The Study of Rectifying the Mind from The Great Learning, pursues the confirmation of Not Perfectly-measured of Four-Beginnings and Perfectly-measured of Seven-Feelings whether could be interpreted through the Relationship with Theory of The Study on Rectifying the Mind and seeks the unique way of understanding of Toegye`s Four-Seven. For achieving these goals, this paper will analyze the gap between Toegye and Gobong about Four-Seven and will discuss Four-Seven of Toegye`s issues which could be questioned by Gobong who has the different point of view from. Toegye explains Four-Beginnings` manifestation connects with Purely-Good and Seven-Feelings` with qi. Per contra, Gobong focuses more on Feelings that Four-Beginnings and Seven-Feelings are revealed by Feelings originated from Nature. Gobong pointed out the limitation of Toegye`s opinion which deficient in explanation of qi from Four-Beginnings and li from Seven-Feelings and also lack of coherence of Not Perfectly-measured of Four-Beginnings and Perfectly-measured of Seven-Feelings. However, for Toegye, the matter of whether Perfectly-measured or Not Perfectly-measured decided not by its Origin but the Supervision of the Mind itself that consists inside mind thoroughly. Then this paper will state Toegye`s reasoning why he introduced Seven-Feelings for studying in The Chapter of Rectifying the Mind of The book Great Learning, Gobong`s contention of Not Perfectly-measured of Four-Beginnings as a refutation from Toegye`s logic, and will figure the divergence of two opinions. Toegye emphasizes only Seven-Feelings as a study subject because Purely-Good nature of Four-Beginnings cannot harm inside mind yet there is a possibility of Seven-Feelings might turn into Evil. On the other hand, Gobong focuses both Four-Beginnings and Seven-Feelings for study subjects with his view which Four-Beginnings could involve inside mind with intention and eventually can cause the result of Not Perfectly-measured of Four-Beginnings. In Toegye`s opinion, Not Perfectly-measured of Four-Beginnings is just the result of wrong manifestation interrupted by intention. Toegye insists that Four-Beginnings itself cannot be described as Perfectly-measured or Not Perfectly-measured. For him, the matter of Perfectly-measured or Not Perfectly-measured of Four-Beginnings is not defined as Origins but is on the level of the expansion of the Supervision of Mind. Throughout this paper, it will be concluded by reviewing Toegye`s Four-Seven with the Supervision of Mind. Whether Perfectly-measured of Seven-Feelings morally revealed or not depends on the Supervision of Mind, not the Origin which ``Seven-Feelings might turn into Evil``. For Toegye, Four-Beginning matter contains not its definition from the Origin but the Supervision of Mind portrayed in the perspective of the Self-Cultivation Theory. Thus, Toegye`s Four-Beginnings and Seven-Feelings could be interpreted thoroughly through the perspective of the Self-Cultivation Theory and considered as practical concept.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 김낙진, "李滉과 奇大升의 理氣 心性論에 나타난 문제의식 검토" 퇴계연구소 (41) : 163-194, 2007
• 2 홍정근, "高峰은 退溪의 四端七情說에 동의하였는가 - 주자어류의 四端是理之發 七情是氣之發에 대한 논의를 중심으로" 한국유교학회 (42) : 293-325, 2010
• 3 奇大升, "高峯集" 민족문화추진회 1988
• 4 윤사순, "退溪의 心性觀에 관한 硏究-사단칠정론을 중심으로" (41) : 1971
• 5 전병욱, "退溪와 栗谷의 心統性情說" (사)율곡학회 29 : 137-167, 2014
• 6 ZHAOTIANTIAN, "退溪와 高峯 四端七情論辨에 있어 ‘四端無不善’과 ‘四端有善惡’의 衝突" 한국양명학회 (38) : 151-185, 2014
• 7 이해영, "退溪四端七情論의 論據에 關한 檢討" 한국유교학회 3 : 1988
• 8 李滉, "退溪全書(『退溪先生文集』)" 성균관대학교 대동문화연구원 1971
• 9 朱熹, "朱子語類" 中華書局 1987
• 10 홍성민, "中節의 문제로 고찰한 고봉 기대승의 도덕 감정론" 한국학연구소 (48) : 267-293, 2014