중국 민사소송에서의 증거법의 발전과 증명책임

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The Law of Evidence is the most prominent part in the development of Chinese Civil Procedure Law and System. Scholars has been concentrated their efforts upon the research of this field and exerted themselves to reform the evidence handling system in Civil Procedure since the early 1990s.
The fundamental cause of this fervent trend has a great deal to do with their aspiration to transform their socialistic civil procedure system which was deeply influenced by the legal system of the former-Soviet Union into a more Westernized one based on the market economy.
In recognition of the impossibility of the drastic and overall revision of their Civil Procedure Law itself because of their socialistic political system, they made an attempt to circumvent the barrier by modifying the way of evidence-related procedure which inevitably will give rise to profound impacts on the whole civil procedure system.
Experiencing the tremendous increase of cases due to the deepening of the market-oriented “Reform and Open Policy” of China, the court responded this roundabout method of change which can meet their urgent need for a more efficient procedure without making unnecessary frictions with the political authority.
In 1998, the Supreme People's Court of China promulgated “Rules of the Supreme People's Court on the Reform of the Methods of Civil Economic Adjudication” to transform their trial method from the existing court- domineering one to a method which allows parties to perform more active roles. In 2001, the Supreme People's Court added another very important Rule, i.e., “Provisions of the Supreme People’s Court on Certain Issues Concerning Evidence in Civil Actions” to support and reinforce the reformation.
After these two epoch-making resolutions, the courts began to show their willingness to permit parties to perform more active roles and also began to charge parties with responsibilities for their conducts in return.
This cautious, somewhat deliberately calculated attempt, so far, could be appraised as successful one. But further intensive steps must be followed to meet the anticipation of the scholars and the courts of China.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 张卫平, "转换的逻辑" 法律出版社 2007
• 2 肖建国, "民事诉讼程序价值论" 中国人民大学出版社 2000
• 3 陈桂明, "民事诉讼法通论" 中国政法大学出版社 1999
• 4 梁书文, "民事诉讼法适用意见新释" 中国法制出版社 2002
• 5 周道鸾, "民事诉讼法教程" 法律出版社 1993
• 6 刘家兴, "民事诉讼法教程" 北京大学出版社 2010
• 7 蔡虹, "民事诉讼法学[第二版]" 北京大学出版社 2010
• 8 常怡, "民事诉讼法学(第一版)" 中国政法大学出版社 1994
• 9 谭兵, "民事诉讼法学" 法律出版社 2009
• 10 张淑兰, "民事诉讼法学" 中国政法大学出版社 1999
• 11 常怡, "民事诉讼法学" 中国法制出版社 2008
• 12 汤维建, "民事诉讼法学" 北京大学出版社 2008
• 13 梁书文, "民事诉讼法及配套规定新释新解(下)" 人民法院出版社 2000
• 14 梁书文, "民事诉讼法及配套规定新释新解(上)" 人民法院出版 2000
• 15 江伟, "民事诉讼法专论" 中国人民大学出版社 2005
• 16 张卫平, "民事诉讼法[第二版]" 法律出版社 2010
• 17 江伟, "民事诉讼法(第四版)" 中国人民大学出版社 2008
• 18 齐树洁, "民事诉讼法(第2版)" 中国人民大学出版社 2010
• 19 赵钢, "民事诉讼法" 武汉大学出版社 2008
• 20 杨荣新, "民事诉讼法" 中国政法大学出版社 2001
• 21 潘剑锋, "民事诉讼原理" 北京大学出版社 2001
• 22 王福华, "民事诉讼专题研究" 中国法制出版社 2007
• 23 陈刚, "比较民事诉讼法" 中国人民大学出版社 2006
• 24 "最高人民法院关于适用中华人民共和国民事诉讼法若干问题的意见" (22) : 1992
• 25 "最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定" (33) : 2001
• 26 "最高人民法院关于民事经济审判方式改革问题的若干规定" (14) : 1998
• 27 "最高人民法院关于审理劳动争议案件适用法律若干问题的解释" (14) : 2001
• 28 唐德华, "新民事诉讼法(实务精答)" 人民法院出版社 2008
• 29 唐德华, "新民事诉讼法(司法适用指南 下)" 人民法院出版社 2008
• 30 唐德华, "新民事诉讼法(司法适用指南 上)" 人民法院出版社 2008
• 31 最高人民法院, "关于适用 中华人民共和国民事诉讼法 若干问题的意见" (22) : 1992
• 32 王怀安, "中国民事诉讼法教程" 人民法院出版社 1988
• 33 柴发邦, "中国民事诉讼法学" 中国人民公安大学出版社 1993
• 34 杨荣新, "中国民事诉讼法" 中国政法大学出版社 1992
• 35 江伟, "中国民事审判改革研究" 中国政法大学出版社 2003
• 36 "中华人民共和法国民事诉讼法"
• 37 "中华人民共和国著作权法"
• 38 "中华人民共和国票据法"
• 39 "中华人民共和国民法通则"
• 40 "中华人民共和国合同法"
• 41 "中华人民共和国劳动法"
• 42 "中华人民共和国劳动争议调解仲裁法"