日常家事代理權과 夫婦連帶責任에 관한 硏究
저자
발행사항
서울 : 檀國大學校 大學院, 1985
학위논문사항
학위논문(석사)-- 단국대학교 대학원 : 법학과 민법전공 1985.2
발행연도
1985
작성언어
한국어
발행국(도시)
서울
형태사항
iv, 155 p. ; 26 cm
일반주기명
지도교수: 李光信
소장기관
This dissertation is an interpretation about Article 827 which prescribes "The right of Proxy for daily household affiars" and Article 832 which prescribes "Joint liability between husband and wife for the obligations with respect to daily household act in our □□□□
Today, as wife's social working increases, it is very difficult for an outsiders to distinguish it from daily household act
Therefore, there lies dormant danger which brings about home rupture because husband's property is the object of joint liability for the obligations owing to wife's household juristic act.
Therefore, this dissertation aims at pointing out reasonable and appropriate interpretation between □□□
A table of contents and the gist of this thesis is as follows. :
(1) The first chapter (The object and the method of study)
(2) The second chapter (history and introduction of legislation of each country)
A The first paragraph
From when did the right of proxy for daily household affairs originate? I thought that the right of proxy for daily household affairs in the capacity of factual action dated from the ancient society of German but the right of proxy for daily household affairs in the capacity of legal action dated from city law in the latter half of the Middle age
B The second paragraph
This paragraph introduced the legislation of Germany, Sweltzerland, France, England, America, the Republic of China, Communist China, North Korea, Japan, Korea, Italy, East Germany, The Philippines.
(3) The third chapter (The characteristic and the exercise of the right of proxy for daily household affairs)
A The first paragraph
What is a characteristic of the right of proxt for daily household affiars? I interpretated this matter as follows.
I thought that the power of representation for daily household affairs included the right of proxy and that proxy tinged with the characteristic of legal representation because our civil code shall apply the articles with respect to proxy.
B The second paragraph
I thought that winning a name for other spouse did not strictly demand when one spouse exercises the proxy for daily household affairs.
C The third paragraph
The ancient society of German that wife absolutely had legal incapacity could not afford to recognize her the proxy for daily household affairs. But the eighteenth or nineteenth century that wife restrictedly had legal incapacity recognized her legal capacity for daily household affairs by means of endowing her with the right of proxy within a scope of daily household affairs. Nowadays, Can wife have the right of proxy for daily household affairs though she is declared incompetent or quasi-incompetence? I conclued that husband could not expire but only restricted the proxy for daily household affairs.
(4) The fourth chapter (The scope of daily household affairs) The past, the scope of daily houshold affairs was determined by the standard of an income of husband but nowadays I think that it is determined to judge individually and to consider compositively whether separate or not, communicate or not, a kind of legal action and the object of legal action for household affairs, the intention and behaviors of a doer for household affairs.
On occasion that communication between husband and wife get unattainable, the disposition belongs to the scope of daily household affairs when one spouse disposes of the other's real property for the community of family
(5) The fifth chapter (The relation between the proxy for dairy household affairs and Arcicle 126) In case that one spouse has performed an juristic act in excess of his authority on daily household matter, shall the other spouse be responsible for the act?
If one spouse has performed an juristic act within the limit of a just cause with respect to relying on within the scope of daily household affairs, the other spouse shall be responsible for the act.
But if the act has been performed in excess of daily household affairs, Article 126 of our civil code shall be applied to the act only in case that one spouse has conferred certain power on other spouse
(6) The sixth chapter (The restriction and the expiration of the promy for daily household affairs) A The first paragraph Can the proxy for daily household affairs be restricted to marriage settlement?
I think that the proxy for daily household affairs can not be restricted to marriage settlement in the light of the characteristic status of the proxy for daily household affairs B The second paragraph The proxy for daily household affairs is expired when one spouse or a pair of spouses die and divorces
(7) The seventh chapter (Joint liability between husband and wife for obligation with respect to daily household affairs) Joint liability between husband and wife has more close relation than joint obligation.
Therefore, one spouse unlimitedly offsets or exampts his own obligation from the other's claims.
(8) The eighth chapter (Whether Article 827 and Article 832 applied to men and women of unregistered and such like or not)
The scholars and courts agree that These articles should apply to men and women of unregistered marriage. And shall men and women of revoeable marriage be applied to these articles? I think that these articles deserve to apply them because a valid marriage has continued to exist until it is reversed But as for the application to men and women of null marriage, they do not have the same viewpoint. In view of putting emphasis on protecting the safety of transactions, I have given my opinion that Article 827 and Article 832 should apply to men and women of null marriage, too.
(9) The ninth chapter (conclusion) I conclued that the next things demanded on the premise that Article 827 and Article 832 applied or operated effectively I insist that wife deserves to be endowed with security of means.
I think that legal measures to appraise wife's household labour and production labour on equal terms husband's labour is needed I think that only the nominal spouse can not free to dispose the property though the property has been in one spouse's own name for the protection of separation of goods
With respect to the disposition of separate property and conclusive act of cantract hearing an obligation from the third person, I think that legal measures to devise the other spouse's consent is needed.
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)