산업재해보상보험법의 몇 가지 문제점과 개선방향 = Survey on the Industrial Accident Insurance Act: suggestion of several points to be revised

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Since the legislation of the Industrial Accident Insurance Act of 1963, we have implemented the system of the industrial accident insurance as a social security insurance. Our industrial accident insurance system was devised to supplement the traditional damage claim system under the civil law, which requires a strict proof rules in a litigation seeking a damage indemnification. The final goal of the industrial accident insurance system is to protect an employee laborer from any possible industrial accident, which includes medical treatment, living expenses, and the protection of people handicapped from industrial accidents. In other words, one of the final goals of the system is to secure and protect the right of existence and living of an employee worker as a human being. In this thesis, I examined some issues of our current system so that they can be improved through some legislative or legally interpretative measures. Those issues can be largely divided into three groups; the scope of the industrial accident insurance coverage, some legal matters related to the current industrial accident insurance system, and the arguments on ‘the privatization of the industrial accident insurance’. More specifically speaking, the matter of the scope of the industrial accident insurance coverage includes the matter of a single employer who is in fact working just like an employee worker from the perspective of the accident risk possibility, the matter of a worker originally employed by an employer in a domestic workplace and later dispatched for a long term period to overseas by the same employer, and the matter of construction workers employed by an employer who runs a non-registered construction workplace under the relevant construction laws. I also touched the matter of causation between the accident and the work performance under the scope of the industrial accident insurance coverage. As for some legal matters related to the current industrial accident insurance system, I examined the prescription period of the right to damage-claim, and the right of damage reimbursement under the current industrial accident insurance, while trying to analyze the relationship between the industrial accident insurance system as a social security insurance and the traditional damage claim system under the civil law. In addition, beneficiary's right to choose a lump-sum or monthly-paid reimbursement, and the scope of the subject of the claim to be filed in and decided by the Accident Insurance Judgement Committee were reviewed. As for the arguments on ‘the privatization of the industrial accident insurance’, I weighed the pros and cons of the argument and presented my disagreement with the privatization at this point of social and economic situation. At the end, as a conclusion, I tried to find some better solutions to the above issues, which are mainly suggestions of further legislative measures and legally acceptable interpretation of the relevant laws and regulations.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 산업재해보상보험의 적용대상 범위의 문제
• Ⅲ. 산업재해보상보험법리상의 문제점
• Ⅳ. 산업재해보상보험의 민영화 논의에 대한 검토
• Ⅴ. 결론
• 〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 통계청, "주거실태, 경제활동 부문 표본집계결과"
• 2 대한산업보건협회 자료, "정보 1 : 제2차 산업재해예방 5개년 계획 요약" 대한산업보건협회 202 : 44-47, 2005
• 3 은종성, "자동차보험과 산업재해보상보헙과의 보상관계에 관한 연구" 전주대학교 사회과학연구원 24 (24): 98-, 2008
• 4 박종식, "위험의 전이와 제도의 지체: 현대자동차 울산공장 정규직과 사내하청업체 노동자 2005년 산재통계 비교" 한국산업노동학회 13 (13): 213-248, 2007
• 5 이경숙, "영국 산업재해관련법 제정의 역사적 배경과 관리체계 고찰" 한국지역사회생활과학회 163-, 2005
• 6 이시윤, "신민사소송법" 박영사 204-, 2005
• 7 허환주, "산재왕국! 하청노동자들의 고통은 곱절" 266 : 81-, 2008
• 8 전광석, "산재보험의 법적성격과 역할" 연세법학회 11 (11): 161-, 2005
• 9 전광석, "산업재해의 법적 문제" 7 : 147-148, 1993
• 10 신수식, "산업재해보상보험제도의 정책과제" 고려대학교 경영대학 41 : 96-, 1997
• 11 이용석, "산업재해보상보험의 민영화 반대론" 한국보험학회 52 : 113-, 1998
• 12 맹수석, "산업재해보상보험법상 업무상 재해의 인정범위에 관한 연구" 58 : 190-, 2001
• 13 문원주, "산업재해보상보험법" 법원사 13-, 2002
• 14 박승희, "산업재해보상보험민영화론의 문제점" 한국사회복지학회 32 : 87-, 1997
• 15 김성환, "산업재해보상과 손해배상의 조정" 5 : 145-146, 1994
• 16 이인재, "사회보장론" 나남출판 396-398, 2006
• 17 최윤희, "비정규직의 현황 및 대책 -고용의 안정성 및 유연성의 문제-" 한국법학원 (106) : 568-583, 2008
• 18 박지순, "동료근로자의 가해행위로 인한 업무상 재해와 산업재해보상보험법상의 구상권 -대법원 2004. 12. 24. 2003다33691판결을 대상으로-" 한국노동법학회 (22) : 365-350, 2006
• 19 김유성, "노동법Ⅰ" 법문사 220-, 2005
• 20 임종률, "노동법" 박영사 464-, 2009
• 21 김형배, "노동법" 박영사 439-, 2007
• 22 김상호, "근로자 산업재해 보상체계의 안정화 방안" 한국노동경제학회 22 : 147-152, 1999
• 23 김경수, "고령농업인의 농작업재해 발생현황" 한국지역사회생활과학회 144-, 2006
• 24 정병대, "逆選擇과 산재보험의 민영화 가능성에 관한 理論的 考察" 한국보험학회 (69) : 157-186, 2004
• 25 백윤철, "The Study on the right of social security in Korea" 한국토지공법학회 23 : 19-38, 2004