解放神學의 社會分析視角에 관한 硏究 = A STUDY ON THE SOCIAL PESPECTIVES OF LIBERATION THEOLOGY
저자
李峻炯 (國民倫理學 專攻)
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
1987
작성언어
Korean
KDC
040.000
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
249-274(26쪽)
제공처
소장기관
Theology of liberation is very interesting to usKoreans who have confronted Communist North Korea because it has influenced the fields of religion, religious life and social life of Koreans . Especially theology of liberation has adopted Marxian concepts and perspectives as its analaytical concepts and perspectives.
Thus the aims of this study are (1) to investigate the social perspectives of liberation theology and (2) to examine the relation between liberation theology and “people's theology”in Korea to help give the exact understanding liberation theology and suffice our intellectual interests and curiosities about theology of liberation. Generally speaking, theology of liberation from Latin America seems to have earnest motives and purposes to feel responsible and humanistic for the poor, to try to get rid of the causes of the poverty, but there seems tobe something wrong with the methods to realize such motives and purposes. So it is thought to be very important that the social perspectives should be analyzed on the base of the Marxian conceptual framework.
To examine the methodological defects of theology of liberation, we employed as the analytical framework the Marxian concepts and perspectives to destory capitalism and to build up socialism or communism;“orthopraxis,”“dual structure of society,”“class struggle,”“violent socialist revolution.” The results of the analgses of the perspectives of liberation theology are as follows:
The “orthopraxis”of liberation theology stems directly from Mark’s proposition, “philosophers have tried to only interpret the world, but what matters is to change the world.” There are largely two ways to change the world: reformation and revolution. Liberation theology chooses the latter like Marxism. But the 20 century has proved that the revolution theory of communism is inferior to the developmental theory of liberal capitalism.
Liberation theology asserts that Christianity has explained impoverishment, not to try to improve it. But that’s not true. Christianity has attempted to change society through individual repentance and the change of individual personality.
It is a serious fallacy that liberation theology has accepted the dualism of social structure which means dividing society in two hostile classes. In theological sense the dualism controdicts God’s impartial love for mankind and universal truth regardless of time and place. In terms of social science it is doubtful whether or not it is approfriate to apply the dualism indiscriminately to the various societies of Latin America though there is a huge gulf between rich and poor. In practical viewpoint the hostile dualism is thought not to help get rid of poverty from Latin America because it can not acquire national consensus and is deprived of many benifical strategies of capitalism through the separation from the western block.
The class struggle, which accompanies the dualism, also goes to a great degree against the impartial love and the universal truth of Christianity and produces a big problem in idiological sense of Christianity. The christian love means the reconciliatory love to tolerate others as well as the universal love for all hnman beings, while the class struggle of liberation theology impies hatred and hostility, not love of recociliation. The class struggle of liberation thelogy is alleged to include the simultaneous liberations of oppressors and oppressed. But the success of the oppressed in the class struggle is only the victory against the oppressors, never the liberation of the oppressed themselves, because the oppressed will use still more power and violence to prevent the revolts and resistances of the old oppressors who have been reduced to the oppressed. That means not the simultaneous liberation of both parties, but the exchange of the previous positions between the two.
One of the important responsibilities of the clergy of Latin America is that they must not confuse the unjust violence of the oppressors and the just violence of the oppressed in considering violence problems in Latin America. Theologists have asserted that they can not liberate the oppressed without violence, which also goes against the love for foes in the Bible. This means not worshiping the gospel of the Bible, but interpreting the universal love of Christianity to justify the socialist revolution.
The “people’s thelogy”of Korea came into existance through particular scio-economic and political situations of Korea during 1960s and 1970s. People’s theology was once named, “Industrial mission”in 1958 and “Urban industrial mission”in 1968. It has been influenced by liberation theology since the serious socio-economic and political adversities of 1970s.
People’s theology has refused to use the term “liberation”because the term seems to be related to the “People’s liberation”of North Korea, the violence of communism and kiberation theology, the rivalry in the dependency theory of Latin America, in the ethnic disputes of the United Ststes and in the class struggle. Even if people’s theology emphasizes its independence and originality, the influence of liberation theology on it is made clear by these common features between them, such as (1) the criticism of the orthodox theologies, (2) the confluence of people’s movement and the theological history of people (3) the relation between theology and the particular social situation like poverty, unfair distribution and infringement of people’s rights, (4) the emphasis of social salvation and praxis, (5) the special notice of the alienated class, (6) the citation of the Exodus as the ground of the Bible, (7) the assertion of Jesus Christ being the friend and emancipator of poor and sick, (8) the most criticism from outside on the excessive situational analysis, etc.
Onthe other hand, liberation theology has had a great deal of influence on our way of life and way of thinking. So intelligentzia and students have become interested in lower people's life and their culture.
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)