「지적재조사에 관한 특별법」에 관한 일고찰 -경계확정에 수반되는 제문제를 중심으로- = A Study on the Special Act on Cadastral Resurvey

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

From 1913 to 1918, the land survey project was conducted with Tokyo Datum as the surveying origin. However, since then, due to incorrect cadastral data caused by loss of surveying control points, stretch, wear and damage of paper cadastral maps and unlisted national lands on the cadastral records, disputes between owners for lands have frequently been occurred and the social and economic costs such as delay of land development projects have been increasing. Above all, existing cadastral maps based on the graphical boundaries established by poor graphical surveying could be used controlling references for cadastrally discrepant lands afterhand, but for they could not be used to proactively cope with situations that cadastrally discrepant lands are generated, they are limited on fundamental prevention of legal dispute possibilities. Therefore, desperately needed is renovation of cadastre that re-registers lands to cadastral records by nationwide cadastral resurvey. To cope with such needs, on September 16th, 2011, the Special Act on Cadastral Resurvey was enacted and promulgated for implementation basis and procedures of cadastral resurvey project to correct inconsistent cadastral records with actual states of lands. However, for the Special Act on Cadastral Resurvey was prepared based on public act studies, it handles judicial rights carelessly, and it tends to emphasis on administrative law efficiency rather than protection of the rights of the individual. Under current status that the legislation system for judicial rights is not organized, it is hard to avoid legal disputes around legal benefit and protection of the individual due to deficiency of the legislation system. According to the Special Act on Cadastral Resurvey, ⅰ) if the actual land state is not coincident with the boundary on the cadastral record, the cadastral competent office shall establish the boundary based on agreement between land owners, actual boundary and boundary relocation surveying, ⅱ) accordingly, shall conduct renovation surveying of cadastre and prepare the cadastral confirmation report, and ⅲ) shall determine the boundary by the resolution of the boundary determination council based on such data. However, if the determined boundary does not correspond with actual rights, above mentioned boundary cannot be determined. If land owners or stakeholders appeals to the cadastral competent office or file an administrative adjudication or litigation against the decision of the boundary determination council, the land has to be remained as so called the boundary undetermined land. As the land unit of the land owner who objects to the decision of the boundary determination council is excluded from the project target lands, it may create conflict between the registration book based on new cadastral record and that based on existing cadastral record and the boundary dispute will occur in the form of ownership verification lawsuit in the future. Other than that, it is expected that the land owners dissatisfied with established boundaries will object by various suit claims such as boundary confirmation suits, ownership verification suits and acquisitive prescription claims. In this paper, noticing that the Special Act on Cadastral Resurvey does not clearly stipulate on whether there is change in the real right for the ownership scope of adjacent lands and legislative relationship for specie collection and payment, it is attempted to seek verification on its legislative relationship. It is considered that such attempt will be relevant to resolutions in the boundary disputes in the future.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 홍성재, "不動産物權變動論-소유권양도를 중심으로-" 법문사 1992
• 2 심의기, "한국법제사강의" 삼영사 1997
• 3 김홍식, "한국근대화과정에 있어서 토지조사사업(1910-1918)" 경희대학교부설경희경제연구소 1992
• 4 김건우, "통감부시기 토지가옥 증명문서에 관한 고찰" 한국법사학회 (37) : 71-97, 2008
• 5 이철우, "토지조사사업과 토지소유법제의 변천"
• 6 이원식, "토지조사법"
• 7 노종천, "토지이동시 소유권의 범위" (23-2) :
• 8 오영준, "토지를 표상하는 지적공부와 등기의 기재가 그 토지의 현황과 상이한 경우의 법률관계, In 부동산소송 2집" 2001
• 9 원영희, "지적학원론" 홍익출판사 1979
• 10 박순표, "지적학개론" 형설출판사 1997
• 11 행정자치부, "지적통계연보"
• 12 한부영, "지적재조사사업에 대한 합리화방안 및 당위성 검토"
• 13 강태석, "지적불부합지의 현황과 실태" 대한지적공사 31 (31): 2001
• 14 원영희, "지적불부합지에 대한 조사연구" 대한지적공사 1982
• 15 거제시, "지적불부합지 정리사례집" 거제시 2005
• 16 주명식, "지적법상 토지이동과 등기 - 특히 판결과 관련하여" 11 :
• 17 안영주, "지적공부와 등기"
• 18 청주대학교 사회과학연구소, "지적공부 재작성을 위한 실지현황 조사·분석연구" 1988
• 19 우병창, "조선시대재산법" 세창출판사 2006
• 20 신용하, "일제하 조선토지조사사업의 구조와 과정" 지식산업사 1982
• 21 조병현, "일제토지조사사업설명" 1999
• 22 윤대성, "일제강점기 토지조사사업의 법적 근거" 30 (30): 2006
• 23 이성룡, "신·구 토지대장상 소유자란 기재의 증명력"
• 24 이영준, "새로운 체계에 의한 한국민법론〔물권법〕" 박영사 2004
• 25 정상현, "부동산명의신탁법리의 기초서설" 법학연구소 17 (17): 283-318, 2005
• 26 곽윤직, "부동산등기법" 박영사 1997
• 27 곽윤직, "물권법, 신정판" 박영사 1993
• 28 고상룡, "명의신탁이론의 재검토 소고, In 민법학논총, 厚巖곽윤직교수화갑기념" 1985
• 29 강봉수, "명의신탁에 있어서 내부적 소유권의 의미, In 민사재판의 제문제 5권" 한국사법행정학회 1989
• 30 김홍식, "대한제국기의 토지제도" 민음사 1990
• 31 왕현종, "대한제국기 한성부의 토지. 가옥조사와 외국인 토지침탈 대책" 서울연구소 (10) : 1998
• 32 홍성무, "구지적법 시행당시 부구등록된 토지대장의 기재내용에 관한 증거가치"
• 33 김종권, "공유토지분할에 관한 등기절차" 1987
• 34 이해우, "공유물분할 청구의 소의 성격" 5 : 1992
• 35 박병호, "韓國法制史拷" 법문사 1974
• 36 법원행정처, "法院史"
• 37 松岡義正, "民法論物權法"
• 38 稻本洋之助, "民法Ⅱ(物權)"
• 39 吾妻光俊, "新版物權法, 擔保物權法"
• 40 崔勝榮, "地籍不符合地 解消方案에 관한 硏究" 한국토지법학회 19 : 109-131, 2003
• 41 末川博, "共有物分割の訴について" 7 (7): 1938