제도의 발전 과정에서 제도적 압력의 생성이중국 기업들의 기업 가치에 미치는 영향 :중국의 환경 제도를 중심으로 = The Effect of the Emerging of Institutional Pressure on the Corporate Value of Chinese Firms in the Process of Institutional Development: Focusing on Environmental Institutions in China

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study aims to investigate how institutional development and institutional pressures affect corporate values. In particular, according to the institutional development level in each region, the effect of the institutional pressure level on corporate values is investigated through empirical evidence, and institutional pressure is divided into three categories: regulatory pressure, normative pressure, and cultural-cognitive pressure.
The research has three main variables: institutional development, institutional pressure, and corporate value. The analysis target country is China, and the analysis target region was divided into 31 provinces and cities to reflect the regional institutional development level in China. The observation period is a total of 10 years, from 2008 to 2017, and the analysis subject was 19,869 samples from 3,079 companies listed on China’s A market for ten years.
The research found that the magnitude of institutional pressure increases as the institutional develops, and as the institutional pressure increases, the corporate value increases. In addition, all pressures positively affected corporate value when the institutional development level was high. However, cultural-cognitive pressure had a negative effect on corporate value when the institutional development level was low.
This study has academic significance in that it investigates how institutional pressures affect corporate values according to the regional institutional development level. In addition, there is a practical implication in that firms can use pressures strategically by demonstrating the effects of regulatory, normative, and cultural-cognitive pressures on corporate values in the process of institutional development.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 논문의 목적은 제도적 발전과 제도적 압력이 기업 가치에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 알아보는 것이다. 특히, 지역별 제도적 발전 수준에 따라 제도적 압력이 기업 가치에 미치는 영향을 실증 분석하고, 특히 제도적 압력을 규제적 압력, 규범적 압력, 문화․인지적 압력 등 3가지로 세분하여 분석하였다.
본 논문의 주요 변수는 제도적 발전, 제도적 압력 및 기업 가치 등 세 가지이다. 분석 대상 국가는 중국이며, 분석 대상 지역은 중국의 지역별 제도 발전 수준을 반영하기 위해 31개 성․시로 세분하였다. 관찰 기간은 2008년부터 2017년까지 총 10년이며, 분석 대상은 중국 A시장에 상장된 3,079개 기업의 10년간 관측 샘플 19,869개이다.
분석에 따르면 제도가 발전할수록 제도적 압력의 크기가 커지고, 제도적 압력이 클수록 기업 가치가 증가하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 제도 발전 수준이 높을 때는 모든 압력이 기업 가치에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 그러나 제도적 발전수준이 낮을 때 문화․인지적 압력은 기업 가치에 부정적인 영향을 미쳤다.
본 연구는 지역별 제도발전 수준에 따라 제도적 압력이 기업 가치에 미치는 영향을 규명하였다는 점에서 학술적 의의가 있다. 또한 중국의 제도 발전 과정에서 규제적 압력, 규범적 압력, 문화적 인지적 압력이 각각 기업 가치에 미치는 영향을 실증함으로써, 기업이 각각의 압력을 전략적으로 활용할 수 있게 했다는 점에서 실무적 시사점이 있다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 양우영 ; 한병섭, "중국의 제도 발전 수준이 기업의 CSR 활동과 재무성과에 미치는 영향: 제도이론을 중심으로" 한국무역연구원 16 (16): 309-328, 2020
• 2 양우영 ; 한병섭, "제도적 압력이 중국 기업의 순응 수준 및 기업 가치에 미치는 영향: 제도이론과 이해관계자이론을 중심으로" 한국무역학회 45 (45): 91-117, 2020
• 3 Khanna, T., "Why Focused Strategies" 75 (75): 41-51, 1997
• 4 Chan, C. M., "Which Country Matters? Institutional Development and Foreign Affiliate Performance" 29 (29): 1179-1205, 2008
• 5 Delmas, M. A., "Voluntary Agreements to Improve Environmental Quality: Symbolic and Substantive Cooperation" 31 (31): 575-601, 2010
• 6 Studenmund, A. H, "Using Econometrics. A Practical Guide" Addison Wesley 2001
• 7 Greenwood, R., "Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields" 45 (45): 58-80, 2002
• 8 Thornton, P. H, "The rise of the corporation in a craft industry: Conflict and conformity in institutional logics" 45 (45): 81-101, 2002
• 9 Scott, W. R., "The Rise of Training Programs in Firms and Agencies: An Institutional Perspective" 13 : 297-326, 1991
• 10 Choi, J. M., "The Quality of Local Government and Firm Performance: The Case of China’s Provinces" 11 (11): 679-710, 2015
• 11 Kassinis, G, "The Oxford Handbook of Business and the Natural Environment" Oxford University Press 83-100, 2012
• 12 Dimaggio, P. J., "The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields" 48 (48): 147-160, 1983
• 13 Wang, L., "The Impact of Chinese Culture on Corporate Social Responsibility: The Harmony Approach" 88 (88): 433-451, 2009
• 14 Khanna, T., "The Future of Business Groups in Emerging Markets: Long-run Evidence from Chile" 43 (43): 268-285, 2000
• 15 Pfeffer, J., "The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective" Stanford University Press 2003
• 16 Abbadi, S. M., "The Effect of Capital Structure on the Performance of Palestinian Financial Institutions" 3 (3): 92-101, 2012
• 17 Fan, G., "The Contribution of Marketization to China’s Economic Growth" 7 (7): 4-, 2012
• 18 Tolbert, P. S., "Studying Organization: Theory and Method" 1999
• 19 Oliver, C., "Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes" 16 (16): 145-179, 1991
• 20 Kassinis, G., "Stakeholder Pressures and Environmental Performance" 49 (49): 145-159, 2006
• 21 Bowen, H. R, "Social Responsibilities of the Businessman" Happer and Brothers 1953
• 22 Berrone, P., "Necessity as the Mother of ‘Green’ Inventions: Institutional Pressures and Environmental Innovations" 34 (34): 891-909, 2013
• 23 Aiken L. S., "Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions" Sage 1991
• 24 Fan, G., "Marketisation Index of China’s Province: NERI Report 2010" Economic Science Press 2010
• 25 Henisz, W. J., "Legitimacy, Interest Group Pressures, and Change in Emergent Institutions: The Case of Foreign Investors and Host Country Governments" 30 (30): 361-382, 2005
• 26 North, D. C, "Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance" Cambridge University Press 1990
• 27 Scott, W. R, "Institutions and Organizations: Ideas, Interests, and Identities" Sage Publications 2013
• 28 Meyer, J. W., "Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony" 83 (83): 340-363, 1977
• 29 Kostova, T., "Institutional Theory in the Study of Multinational Corporations: A Critique and New Directions" 33 (33): 994-1006, 2008
• 30 Raynard, M, "Institutional Imprints: The Enduring Effects of Past Political Regimes on CSR in China" University of Alberta 2016
• 31 Chen, Y., "Institutional Environment, Firm Ownership, and IPO First-day Returns: Evidence from China" 32 : 150-168, 2015
• 32 Yin, J., "Institutional Drivers for Corporate Social Responsibility in an Emerging Economy: A Mixed-Method Study of Chinese Business Executives" 56 (56): 672-704, 2017
• 33 Sherer, P. D., "Institutional Change in Large Law Firms: A Resource Dependency and Institutional Perspective" 45 (45): 102-119, 2002
• 34 Rodriguez, P., "Government Corruption and the Entry Strategies of Multinationals" 30 (30): 383-396, 2005
• 35 Maswadeh, S. N, "Financial Structure Effects on Jordanian Banks Tobin’s Q" 19 : 35-41, 2021
• 36 Lin, L, "Corporate Social Responsibility in China: Window Dressing or Structural Change?" 28 (28): 1-37, 2010
• 37 Surroca, J., "Corporate Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Role of Intangible Resources" 31 (31): 463-490, 2010
• 38 Chan, M. C., "Corporate Governance Quality and CSR Disclosures" 125 (125): 59-73, 2014
• 39 Cao, H., "CSR and Government Recognition Effects on Employee Outcomes" 2015
• 40 Kostova, T., "Adoption of Organizational Practices by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects" 45 (45): 215-233, 2002