유도지도자의 지도행동유형이 집단응집력 및 성원만족에 미치는 영향 = The Impact of the Leadership Behavior Style of Judo Instructors on Group Cohesion and Member Satisfaction

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study was to make a quantitative investigation into the impact of the leadership behavior style of Judo instructors on group cohesion and the satisfaction of group members in a bid to help determine what type of leadership style and profile Judo instructors should have. The subjects in this study were 278 players who were selected from a population that consisted of Judo players in Seoul and Gyeonggi province who joined Korea Judo Association. After a survey was conducted, the players who gave completed answer sheets were selected. The collected data were analyzed with SPSS PC+ Ver. 10.0 program in a way to serve the purpose of the study, and the findings of the study were as follows:
First, there was a positive correlation between the leadership behavior style of Judo instructors and group cohesion. Regarding the impact of leadership behavior style on group cohesion, leadership behavior style exerted a positive influence at the 1% level of significance on social cohesion at a personal(training, social support and reward) and collective(authority, training, social support and reward) level, and on task cohesion at a personal(democracy, social support and reward) and collective(democracy and social support) level.
Second, in terms of correlational relationship between the leadership behavior style of Judo instructors and the satisfaction of the group members, there was correlation among leadership behavior style, task reception and social interaction. The leadership behavior style had a positive impact at the 1% level of significance on their satisfaction with task reception(training and authority), social interaction(training and reward) and coach behaviors(training, democracy and reward).
Third, as for the correlation of the extent of the workout of the Judo players to group cohesion and satisfaction, there was a positive correlation among their extent of exercise, satisfaction and coach behaviors. In regard to the influence of the extent of exercise on group cohesion, social cohesion at a personal level was under the influence of exercise hours and career at the 1% level of significance, and workout hours and career had a positive impact at the 1% level of significance on personal and group cohesion. Concerning the impact of the extent of workout on satisfaction, satisfaction with task reception was positively affected by workout hours at the 1% level of significance, and satisfaction with social interaction was positively influenced at the 1% level of significance by workout career and hours. Their satisfaction with coach behaviors was under the positive influence of workout hours at the 1% level of significance.