근대문화유산의 현황과 보존방안 연구 = The Current Status and Preservation Plan of Modern Cultural Heritage

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The modern cultural heritage accounting for 5% of the total cultural assets has a bit more the designated heritage than the registered heritage; among all the designated heritage, ones designated by cities and provinces are 3 times more than the state-designated ones. The fact that there is higher portion of heritage materials is significantly positive. By region, Seoul maintains lots of modern cultural heritage because the city has been a hub in all aspects including politics, economy, industry and culture; South and North Jeolla Provinces also house relatively more heritage than other regions because the area had been flourished during the Japanese colonial period but long isolated from the economic development after the liberation.
The system to register cultural heritage was introduced in 2001 to positively cope with the situation where the modern cultural heritage was gradually going extinct and deteriorated without any systematical investigation or valuation amid the rapid industrialization and urbanization. Despite this, the designated/registered modern cultural heritage remains a few. Rather than just investigating, follow-up(and in depth) works should be conducted to make those heritage escape from extinction, deterioration, and forgetfulness to preserve such heritage as designated/registered ones. Other items, which is likely to be registered as the modern cultural heritage, are historic sites used for independent movement and national defense. Maybe those sites are considered just related to the duty by the Ministry of National Defense and the Ministry of Patriots and Veterans Affairs: only a few of them has been registered/designated as cultural heritage.
Preservation, management and utilization require the exact situation where the modern cultural heritage is. Only about 1/10 out of the whole independent movement sites has been conserved in the original form; the rest of them goes extinct, are modified or deteriorated. Even applying it to the modern cultural heritage, the situation isn’t any different. That’s why we should pay attention to conservation and management of the modern cultural heritage.
The conservation of the modern cultural heritage starts from correct understanding of cultural assets. Cultural properties need to be conserved by identifying their meaning and spirits and making efforts to connect them to the contemporary history, rather than considering them just cultural assets. ‘The plan of Preservation and Management for the Modern Cultural Heritage’ should be established within a consistent principle and frame, and can attract the public participation. we should enrich the present life and design the future life by conserving/managing/using not only proud cultural assets but also shameful ones.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The modern cultural heritage accounting for 5% of the total cultural assets has a bit more the designated heritage than the registered heritage; among all the designated heritage, ones designated by cities and provinces are 3 times more than the state-designated ones. The fact that there is higher portion of heritage materials is significantly positive. By region, Seoul maintains lots of modern cultural heritage because the city has been a hub in all aspects including politics, economy, industry and culture; South and North Jeolla Provinces also house relatively more heritage than other regions because the area had been flourished during the Japanese colonial period but long isolated from the economic development after the liberation.
The system to register cultural heritage was introduced in 2001 to positively cope with the situation where the modern cultural heritage was gradually going extinct and deteriorated without any systematical investigation or valuation amid the rapid industrialization and urbanization. Despite this, the designated/registered modern cultural heritage remains a few. Rather than just investigating, follow-up(and in depth) works should be conducted to make those heritage escape from extinction, deterioration, and forgetfulness to preserve such heritage as designated/registered ones. Other items, which is likely to be registered as the modern cultural heritage, are historic sites used for independent movement and national defense. Maybe those sites are considered just related to the duty by the Ministry of National Defense and the Ministry of Patriots and Veterans Affairs: only a few of them has been registered/designated as cultural heritage.
Preservation, management and utilization require the exact situation where the modern cultural heritage is. Only about 1/10 out of the whole independent movement sites has been conserved in the original form; the rest of them goes extinct, are modified or deteriorated. Even applying it to the modern cultural heritage, the situation isn’t any different. That’s why we should pay attention to conservation and management of the modern cultural heritage.
The conservation of the modern cultural heritage starts from correct understanding of cultural assets. Cultural properties need to be conserved by identifying their meaning and spirits and making efforts to connect them to the contemporary history, rather than considering them just cultural assets. ‘The plan of Preservation and Management for the Modern Cultural Heritage’ should be established within a consistent principle and frame, and can attract the public participation. we should enrich the present life and design the future life by conserving/managing/using not only proud cultural assets but also shameful ones.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 김희곤, "효율적인 현충사적 관리 활용방안, 국내 항일독립운동 및 국가수호 사적 지 관리와 활용" 국가보훈처 2010
• 2 목수현, "한국의 근대문화유산" 4 : 2004
• 3 권희영, "한국사의 근대성 연구" 백산서당 2001
• 4 김창규, "지방문화재의 보존, 활용을 위한 법제개선 및 정책방향" 19 : 2006
• 5 "조선일보"
• 6 민현석, "어떻게 서울 도심부의 역사문화자원을 보존할 것인가" 26 : 2008
• 7 아우슈비츠-비르케나우 국립박물관, "아우슈비츠-비르케나우 수용소, in 역사와 현재(한글판)" 2009
• 8 "문화재청 홈페이지" 문화재청
• 9 김희곤, "대구 경북 독립운동사적지 II" 국가보훈처 2010
• 10 정민섭, "근대문화유산의 관광자원화 방향에 관한 연구" 14 : 2006
• 11 이상해, "근대문화유산의 개념 범위 보존방안, 근대문화유산의 보존과 활용" 문화재청 2000
• 12 윤선자, "근대문화유산과 종교건물" 한국기독교역사학회 (22) : 129-158, 2005
• 13 "근대문화유산 보존을 위한 등록문화재 제도" 문화재청 2005
• 14 조명래, "근대문화유산 보존을 위한 ‘정부-시민’관계에 관한 연구" 26 (26): 2001
• 15 서울대학교 산학협력단, "근대문화유산 문학분야 목록화 조사보고서" 문화재청 2009
• 16 "근대문화유산 목록화 및 조사보고서" 강원도 2003
• 17 "근대문화유산 건축물 사진실측 조사보고서" 문화재청 2001
• 18 김지성, "근대건축물의 보존, 활용을 위한 등록문화재 제도에 관한 연구" 충남대 2005
• 19 김동식, "근대건축문화유산의 보존과 활용에 관한 연구" 청주대 2001
• 20 도코모모 코리아, "근대 건축문화유산 보존 활성화를 위한 등록 문화재 제도개선 연구" 2007
• 21 김용달, "국내 항일독립운동 및 국가수호 사적지 조사 결과 보고, 국내 항일독립운동 및 국가수호 사적지 관리와 활용" 국가보훈처 2010
• 22 김정신, "교회건축문화재의 보존현황과 과제" 19 : 2002
• 23 윤선자, "광주전남 독립운동사적지 I" 국가보훈처 2010
• 24 趙東杰, "韓國近代史의 試鍊과 反省" 지식산업사 1989
• 25 정민섭, "CVM을 이용한 근대문화유산의 가치평가에 관한 연구(인천 최초사 박물관의 건립사례를 중심으로)" 한국호텔외식경영학회 17 (17): 175-195, 2008