김수장의 김천택 시조 수용에 대하여 = Sujang Kim’s Acceptance of Cheontaek Kim’s Sijo

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Cheontaek Kim and Sujang Kim were in a senior-junior relationship, walking the same path during a similar period in the Korean sijo (three-verse Korean poem) literature history. Cheontaek Kim published ‘Cheong-Gu-Young-Ean’by compiling his sijos and passed-down sijos in 1728. From his own works, he carefully selected and included 30 sijos that intensively show his life. Sujang Kim carefully selected already existing sijos and his own sijos, and published a collection of sijos called ‘Hae-Dong-Ga-Yo’ over two times. In ‘Hae-Bak’ in 1755, he assigned a certain number of works of each artist to be included, however, in 1767 in ‘Hae-Ju’, he did not put limits on the number of works to include. Sujang Kim exhibited his desire to exceed the achievements of Cheontaek Kim by publishing ‘Hae-Ju’. As a result of deleting unnecessary partsfrom Cheontaek Kim’s works in ‘Cheong-Gu-Young-Ean’ and publishing such works in ‘Hae-Ju’, 16 sijos were exchanged to new sijos, and Sujang Kim did not hesitate on criticizing Cheontaek Kim’s sijos. In addition, Sujang Kim showed confidence by including 117 of his own sijosin ‘Hae-Ju’, which is a significantly higher number than the 57 sijos of Cheontaek Kim. In addition, by drastically revising Cheontaek Kim’s sijos when accepting the works, he expected to lower Cheontaek Kim’s status while enhancing hi sown.
Sujang Kim’s insight in selecting sijos shown when selecting Choentaek Kim’s sijos receive a positive response from compilers, as shown by the frequency of citation in future poet compilations. However, including a significantly higher number of one’s own works in a book published by oneself while arbitrarily fixing another’s works fitting to one’s own taste will not be able to evade the criticism that such act was an excessive overstep of one’s authority.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 김천택의 청구영언 편찬의식과 자작시조 30수
• Ⅲ. 김수장의 김천택 시조 수용
• Ⅳ. 김수장의 김천택 시조 개변
• Ⅴ. 결론
• 〈참고문헌〉
• [Abstract]

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 김선기, "金壽長의 孤山 尹善道 詩歌 受容과 그 意義" 어문연구학회 58 : 201-227, 2008
• 2 김선기, "평시조의 율격과 종장형의 생성원리" 충남대 인문과학연구소 13 (13): 1-37, 1986
• 3 황충기, "청구영언과 해동가요" 한국시조학회 7 : 173-197, 1991
• 4 김용찬, "청구영언 珍本의 성격과 편찬의식" 민족어문학회 35 : 373-394, 1996
• 5 김학성, "조선후기 시조집의 편찬과 국문시가의 동향" 단국대동양학연구소 23 : 317-326, 1993
• 6 심재완, "역대시조전서" 세종문화사 1972
• 7 최동원, "고시조론" 삼영사 1980
• 8 김흥규, "고시조대전" 고려대학교 민족문화연구원 2012
• 9 조규익, "가곡의 문헌적 연구(1), In 한국학의 존재와 당위, 일평조남권선생칠질기념송수논총" 20-21, 1997
• 10 姜銓爕, "韓國古典文學硏究" 대왕사 1982
• 11 黃淳九, "靑丘永言 (珍本)" 금방울사 1980
• 12 김영호, "玄黙子 洪萬宗의 『靑丘永言』 編纂에 관하여―新發見 洪萬宗 著述 『覆瓿藁』의 「靑丘永言序」 및 「梨園新譜序」를 중심으로" 대동문화연구원 (61) : 319-347, 2008
• 13 金壽長, "海東歌謠 (朴氏本)" 규장문화사 1983
• 14 金壽長, "海東歌謠 (周氏本), 경성제대인쇄본"
• 15 洪萬宗, "洪萬宗全集 上" 태학사 1-122, 1986
• 16 梁熙讚, "時調集의 編纂 系列 연구" 高麗大學校 大學院 1994