商標法에 의한 著作權保護의 美國判例 考察 : 539 U.S. 23, 123 S. Ct.2041; 156 L. Ed. 2d 18 April 2, 2003, Argued; June 2, 2003, Decided = Review of the U.S. Case for the Copyright Protection by the Trademark Law

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Copyright is a legal protection that covers published and unpublished literary, scientific and artistic works, and whatever the form of expression. Copyright gives the owner the exclusive right to reproduce, distribute, perform, display, or license his work. Copyright protects original work of authorship such as a picture, drawing, graphics, software program, written work, sculpture, song, or photograph, and so forth. Therefore copyright law prohibits copying another's copyrighted work for any purpose, making things based on the copyrighted work, distributing copies of the copyrighted work, publicly performing the copyrighted work, displaying the copyrighted work, and in the case of sound recordings, transmitting the recording over the internet or in another media. Similarly, trademark includes any word, name, symbol, or device, or any combination, used, or intended to be used, in commerce to identify and distinguish the goods of one manufacturer or seller from goods manufactured or sold by others, and to indicate the source of the goods. Therefore trademark law prohibits using another's trademark on your merchandise, because such use will cause consumers to believe that the trademark owner has made, approved of, or endorsed your merchandise.
However, it is said that the border of copyright and trademark has been blurred because the purpose of the copyright law and the trademark law is to protect the result of the human's intellectual and mental works. Thus, it is also said when copyright is infringed the infringed copyright can be recovered not only by the copyright law but also by the trademark law. By the way, indeed can it be true as is said that trademark law truly protects copyright? Then we seriously need to think what is different the copyright law from the trademark law. This Review tried to find the answer to that kind of questions through the famous U.S. Supreme Court case, Dastar v. Twentieth Century Fox, [123 S. Ct. 2041; 156 L. Ed. 2d 18 (2003)]. This Review basically introduces and analyzes the U.S. case in order to find the way to balance the copyright law and the trademark law on the purpose of legislation of the both laws.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
• Ⅱ. 사실관계
• Ⅲ. 판결
• 1. 지방법원
• 2. 항소법원
• 3. 대법원
• Ⅳ. 국내법상 저작권과 상표권
• Ⅴ. 맺는말
• 1. 사건의 정리
• 2. 결론

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 "제5정판 지적재산권법" 세창출판사 2003.
• 2 "제3판 저작권법개설" 세창출판사 2003.
• 3 "전정증보판 저작권법개설" 세창출판사 2003.
• 4 "Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc., 529 U.S. 205, 146 L. Ed. 2d 182, 120 S. Ct. 1339" Inc. v. Samara Brothers Inc. 120-1339, 2000
• 5 "TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc., 532 U.S. 23, 149 L. Ed. 2d 164, 121 S. Ct. 1255" Inc. v. Marketing Displays Inc. 121-1255, 2001
• 6 "Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co., 514 U.S. 159, 131 L. Ed. 2d 248, 115 S. Ct. 1300" 115-1300, 1995
• 7 "Ltd. v. Interstate Cigar Co." 1974
• 8 "Ltd. v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago" ca71982
• 9 "J. McCarthy Trademarks and Unfair Competition" 2002
• 10 "Inc. v. Universal Marine Co." ca51976
• 11 "Inc. v. Azoff" 1963
• 12 "Eldred v. Ashcroft, 537 U.S. 186, 154 L. Ed. 2d 683, 123 S. Ct. 769" 123-769, 2003
• 13 "Dastar v. Twentieth Century Fox. No. 02-428 123 S. Ct. 2041; 156 L. Ed. 2d 18" 2003
• 14 "2차적 저작물에 관한 한 미 저작권법의 비교연구 - 적법성을 중심으로 - 비교사법" 8 (8): 2001.