KCI등재
유럽에서의 同性婚 合法化 傾向 = Legalization of Same-Sex Marriage in Europe -focused on England and France-
저자
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2015
작성언어
-주제어
KDC
360
등재정보
KCI등재
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
201-264(64쪽)
제공처
The Discussion on legalizing same-sex marriage began about 20 years ago at the European level, but there's no binding regulation to enforce the member states of EU or European Council to allow same sex marriage or civil union. Also the European court of Human Rights declared that the question whether or not to allow same-sex marriage is left to regulation by the national law of the Contracting State. The Court reiterates that it must not rush to substitute its own judgment about marriage in place of that of the national authorities, because marriage has deep-rooted social and cultural connotations which may differ largely from one society to another. But this statement doesn't mean that the principle of non-discrimination on account of sexual orientation plays no role at the level of EU und European Council. For example European Court of Justice ruled that the refusal to grant the survivor's pension to same-sex partners constitutes direct discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation. Also according to the recent judgement of ECtHR the margin of appreciation in relation to unequal treatment based on sex or sexual orientation is narrow, so that it must be shown that such a discriminatory measure was not merely suitable but necessary in order to achieve the aim sought. Based on this consideration ECtHR ruled that Greece had violated the European Convention on Human Rights by excluding same-sex couples from a civil union.
In the meanwhile more and more European countries legalize same-sex marriage. Since Netherland legalized same-sex marriage in 2000 first in the world, 9 member states of EU and 11 Contracting states of European Council grant same-sex marriage. Among them especially England and France deserve further research and study in consideration of the important position which these states occupy in the EU and in comparative law study.
In UK the Civil Partnership Act 2004 enabled same-sex couples to obtain legal recognition of their relationship by forming a civil partnership. Although CPA 2004 allowed to civil partners same rights and responsibilities as married couples in many areas including tax, social security, inheritance and workplace benefits, but some have argued that there are still differences in the perception of the two institutions and these arguments have been advanced that same sex couples should be able to marry. Worth noting is that the role of Courts which contribute traditionally to enhancing human rights was in developing the arguments for allowing same-sex marriage limited. In Wilkinson v. Kitzinger the High Court of Justice announced that the prohibition of same-sex marriage is no discrimination of European Convention of Human Rights, taking into consideration that English law already granted to homosexual couples to live in a very close, loving, and monogamous relationship. By contrast the government and parliament of England found it insufficient only to grant same-sex couples very similar legal position as that of conjugal couple. Also same-sex couple should be provided with the same opportunity to recognize that commitment in the valued institution of marriage In addition it was taken into account that the recognition of same-sex marriage will also get rid of some discriminatory differences between civil marriages and civil partnerships. Finally the Marriage (Same Sex Couple) Act 2013 enables same sex couples to marry, either in a civil ceremony or with the marriage being solemnized through a religious ceremony. But the legislator took caution not to compel religious organizations to conduct marriages for same sex couples, so same sex marriage ceremony on religious premises is permitted only when the religious organization consents.
Under the previous French Code Civil, a marriage could only be between a man and a woman. But the legislation of the Pacs (Civil Union) in 1999 offered to the possibility to conclude a homosexual civil union. In comparison with the civil partnership of
분석정보
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)