KCI등재
한말·일제강점기 뮈텔 주교의 교육활동 = Bishop Mutel’s Educational Activities at the End of the Chosun Dynasty and During the Colonial Period in Korea
저자
김정환 (내포교회사연구소)
발행기관
학술지명
한국 근현대사 연구(Journal of Korean modern and contemporary history)
권호사항
발행연도
2011
작성언어
Korean
주제어
등재정보
KCI등재
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
7-41(35쪽)
KCI 피인용횟수
8
제공처
소장기관
Bishop Mutel as the highest decision-maker of the Catholic Church in Korea, at the close of the Chosun dynasty and during the period of Japanese occupation in Korea, developed various educational activities during 43 years of his episcopate. The characteristic of his educational activities is they had been focused on the direct mission, as manifested well the report prepared by himself for the invitation of the order centered on education. His main concern was to bring up catholic teachers by establishing a college of education and to support the schools run by catholic church in each local area. He was also interested in setting up the institutions for higher education able to compete with protestant-supported college and in preventing the young catholics from being influenced by protestant proselytism.
As a matter of fact, the contents of the report came true in his educational activities. Calling in the order in charge of the education in Korea, he asked, first of all, the foundation of a college of education. Although the running of the college was bound to fail due to the Japanese control to the education and the financial and internal situation in the order, he had centered on the training of catholic teachers.
The particularity of his educational activities was the system based on each parish. The nurturing of the talented based on diocese was not so active, for the lack of financial and human resources, but the educational activities in each parish had been very vigorous. They tried to bring up the human power for the mission by cultivation of the leader of laity and the leader of propagation above all, though not by the ordinary schooling. They also had made efforts to help the youth to enlarge the theological knowledge as well as the secular one through the schools founded by catholic churches.
The seminary for the future priest even in small scale was the one of his principal objectives, as the task of bring up the Korean priests had the priority for the mission and also for the rise of Catholic Church in Korea.
However, he had the shortcomings in his educational activities in spite of his endeavors mentioned above. He adopted a very positive attitude for the task of founding schools and fostering the talented, directly speeding up the catholic mission, but disinterested, even negative in the establishing the institutions for higher education deviated from this objective. That’s why he took a stand against the proposition of founding a college by some Korean forerunners such as Ahn Jung Geun. Such a position taking brought about a poor progress, or retarded in the establishment of higher education, which was resulted in the long term in a lack of human resources needed in various social fields. Finally he has been underestimated as a person who was disinterested or negative in the education for the Koreans.
Bishop Mutel as the highest decision-maker of the Catholic Church in Korea, at the close of the Chosun dynasty and during the period of Japanese occupation in Korea, developed various educational activities during 43 years of his episcopate. The characteristic of his educational activities is they had been focused on the direct mission, as manifested well the report prepared by himself for the invitation of the order centered on education. His main concern was to bring up catholic teachers by establishing a college of education and to support the schools run by catholic church in each local area. He was also interested in setting up the institutions for higher education able to compete with protestant-supported college and in preventing the young catholics from being influenced by protestant proselytism.
As a matter of fact, the contents of the report came true in his educational activities. Calling in the order in charge of the education in Korea, he asked, first of all, the foundation of a college of education. Although the running of the college was bound to fail due to the Japanese control to the education and the financial and internal situation in the order, he had centered on the training of catholic teachers.
The particularity of his educational activities was the system based on each parish. The nurturing of the talented based on diocese was not so active, for the lack of financial and human resources, but the educational activities in each parish had been very vigorous. They tried to bring up the human power for the mission by cultivation of the leader of laity and the leader of propagation above all, though not by the ordinary schooling. They also had made efforts to help the youth to enlarge the theological knowledge as well as the secular one through the schools founded by catholic churches.
The seminary for the future priest even in small scale was the one of his principal objectives, as the task of bring up the Korean priests had the priority for the mission and also for the rise of Catholic Church in Korea.
However, he had the shortcomings in his educational activities in spite of his endeavors mentioned above. He adopted a very positive attitude for the task of founding schools and fostering the talented, directly speeding up the catholic mission, but disinterested, even negative in the establishing the institutions for higher education deviated from this objective. That’s why he took a stand against the proposition of founding a college by some Korean forerunners such as Ahn Jung Geun. Such a position taking brought about a poor progress, or retarded in the establishment of higher education, which was resulted in the long term in a lack of human resources needed in various social fields. Finally he has been underestimated as a person who was disinterested or negative in the education for the Koreans.
분석정보
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | KCI등재 |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | KCI등재 |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | KCI등재 |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | KCI등재 |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | KCI등재 |
2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | KCI등재 |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | KCI후보 |
2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | KCI후보 |
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.71 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.65 | 0.62 | 1.675 | 0.11 |
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)