KCI등재
대통령 소속 위원회 운영과 행정조직법정주의 = Operation of the committees directly responsible to the President and the Principle that the essential parts of the governmental bodies shall be prescribed by law
저자
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2007
작성언어
-주제어
등재정보
KCI등재
자료형태
학술저널
발행기관 URL
수록면
501-525(25쪽)
KCI 피인용횟수
19
DOI식별코드
제공처
소장기관
The current government has established numerous committees to deal with major pending issues under the name of enhancing the level of democracy and promoting efficiency and consistency of administration by cutting the red tape to overcome the existing decision-making mechanism that has been so much dependent upon the centralized power system and by providing various social groups with more chances to participate in the decision making process.
Establishment and management of such committees has certain advantages in that it could promote the efficiency and consistency of administration by overcoming the departmentalism and by guaranteeing various social groups more chance for participating in the governmental decision making process. However, such effort has now encountered significant Constitutional problems. Empowered by Presidential decrees, those committees, which are mostly consultative bodies, are taking places of administrative bodies in establishing policies and playing an important role in execution and enforcement of such policies. We should note that these replacements are highly likely to be against the basic constitutional principles on construction and empowerment of administrative bodies, specifically against the principle that the essential parts of the governmental bodies shall be prescribed by law (hereinafter referred to as "the principle"). In other words, the Blue House and the chamber of Prime Minister have neglected in utilizing the existing administrative bodies. Instead, they began adopting amateur ideological political figures and established numerous committees, which are not empowered by law but authorized by Presidential decrees or Ministerial ordinances wishing that such effort could grow the power of the influential figures of current government. We can easily find plural examples of such deviling national administrations, which resulted in the division of national power and the abuse of authority.
The main points of the criticism are as follows. First, the current government is flooded with too many committees. Owing to the over supply of committees, they have acted more often as spokesmen of government or have performed almost same function as the exiting administrative bodies, all of which led to the inefficiency of system and caused the financial problems. Second, management and empowerment of such committees inside of the government does not have solid constitutional or legal foundation. Moreover, we don’t have sufficient and efficient system to hold such committees in check, which have already gone beyond their legal powers.
However, we should note that there are certain advantages in organizing and running such committees. The supporters for such committees argue that the departmentalism and short-term performance-based evaluation system can be overcome by operating such committees, paving the way to reflect fresh nongovernmental ideas to the policy making process. In light of these advantages, it is required to review the whole system of such committees to obtain solid legal ground.
First of all, when an administrative committee is established by the law and an advisory committee is installed by Ordinance, based on Article 4 and 5 of Governmental Organization Law, this can not fall into a category of violation of basic constitutional rules of government organization and the principle. This is because the legislative power, based on Article 96 of Constitution, has discretion in establishing governmental bodies. In other words, the legislative power, judging from the nature of official role of each body, can put a committee in the supervision of Prime Minister, who shall follow orders from the President, or in the direct supervision of the President. With respect to an advisory committee, no legal problem can be pointed out, because even if it is operated under the direct supervision of the President, it shall not enjoy the executive powers. Therefore, there may be no problem in legal foundation for establishing these two committees, an administrative committee and an advisory committee.
However, in regard of the committees directly responsible to the President, especially the advisory committee, it should be noted that there exist not a few legal issues involving the manner of exercising their powers. In spite that the extent of power for an advisory committee is limited to producing and preserving consultative opinions, it is often witnessed for such an advisory committee to take part in deliberation or decision making processes. Such exercise of powers are clearly out of constitutional and legal boundary, and therefore constitute a violation of the principle. In addition, if the President doesn't stop attempting to take advantage of such advisory committees in an effort to impede the deliberation powers of Cabinet council and utilizing such committees to exercise his powers in an arbitrary manner, his acts shall be deemed to be totally unconstitutional. These acts shall be regarded as unconstitutional challenges to disregard the current law and to incapacitate checks and balance system required of in the government.
In conclusion, as discussed above, there exist a number of legal problems regarding the committees directly responsible to the President, especially the advisory committees. To deal with this, it is imperative to rearrange related laws in order to hold such committees in check and to make clear their duties and responsibilities.
분석정보
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2027 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2021-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | KCI등재 |
2018-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | KCI등재 |
2015-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | KCI등재 |
2014-12-23 | 학회명변경 | 영문명 : Law Research Institute, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies -> The HUFS Law Research Institute | KCI등재 |
2014-12-22 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : 미등록 -> HUFS Law Review | KCI등재 |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | KCI등재 |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | KCI등재 |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | KCI후보 |
2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | KCI후보 |
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.75 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.72 | 0.69 | 0.856 | 0.38 |
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)