The Influencing Factors on SUDAN’S DISPUTE Settlement and Its transition to the Democratic System

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose: In the case of a conflict that today destabilizes a country s system such as a complex civil war, it is quite difficult to resolve it on its own. If disputes are not any more internal problems and threaten international security, efforts by the international community cannot help but be made. The purpose of this study is to analyze how the resolution of disputes in a country and the transition of democratic systems can be achieved through multilateral cooperation among various actors in the international community. Method: To this end, the situation of Darfur in Sudan will be selected as a case study. First, the factors that influenced the resolution of conflict faced by Sudan and the transition of the democratic system will be divided into internal and external factors, then I look at how these factors worked and what the correlation between them is. Results: The two internal factors, the demand for democracy by civil society, which used the coup as an opportunity for change, and the resolution of disputes by the transitional government and the tran-sition to a democratic system, had positive impacts on Sudan. The external factor pushed by the U.S. has affected the will of the interim government for the transition to the democratic system. Efforts by the international community, including the United Nations, served as a positive external factor, too. The creation of a peace-building mission in response to the Sudanese government s willingness to re-solve the problem has served as a practical external factor of the international community. Conclusion: Intra-state conflict is not easy to be settled by the country’s single will. Therefore the Sudan case has meaningful implications to us on how that state and the international community will have to seek more inclusive efforts.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. Introduction 2. Civil war in Darfur in Sudan and the Military Coup 3. Influencing Factors of Dispute Settlement and Transition of Democratic System 4. Conclusion 5. References

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 "https://www.bbc.com/"
• 2 "https://www.bbc.co.uk/"
• 3 "https://www.aljazeera.com/"
• 4 "https://www.aljazeera.com/"
• 5 "https://unitams.unmissions.org/"
• 6 "https://unitams.unmissions.org/"
• 7 "https://unamid.unmissions.org/"
• 8 "https://thedefensepost.com/"
• 9 "https://edition.cnn.com/"
• 10 Barnidge Jr. RP, "The United Nations and the African Union : Assessing a Partnership for Peace in Darfur" 14 (14): 93-113, 2009
• 11 Mngomezulu BR, "The Role of the International Community in Sustaining Conflicts in Africa" 6 (6): 5-21, 2019
• 12 Garcia C., "The New Wars of the XXI Century. Trends in Contemporary Armed Conflict" 323 : 1-28, 2013
• 13 Hyeshim Jung, "The Implications of Police Gender Incusive LEADERSHIP" J-INSTITUTE 5 (5): 10-20, 2020
• 14 Healy S., "Seeking Peace and Security in the Horn of Africa: The Contribution of the Intergovernmental Authority on Development" 87 (87): 105-120, 2019
• 15 UN Security Council, "Report on Situation in Sudan and the Activities of the United Nations Integrated Transition Assistance Mission in Sudan(UNITAMS)" 2021
• 16 Hassanain M, "Protest and Transition in Sudan" 73 (73): 217-224, 2020
• 17 Guerrero Gonzalo, "Prospects for NEW WARS in the 21st Century" J-INSTITUTE 6 (6): 43-53, 2021
• 18 Hendricks C, "Progress and Challenges in Implementing the Women, Peace and Security Agenda in the African Union’s Peace and Security Architecture" 42 (42): 73-98, 2017
• 19 Beswick D, "Peacekeeping, Regime Security ad African Solutions to African Problems : Exploring Motivations for Rwanda’s Involvement in Darfur" 31 (31): 739-754, 2010
• 20 Srinavasan S, "Negotiating Violence : Sudan’s Peacemakers and the War in Darfur" 113 (113): 24-44, 2014
• 21 Cho Sung-taek, "Nations, Nationalism and TERRORISM" J-INSTITUTE 1 (1): 11-15, 2016
• 22 Chesterman S, "Law and Practice of the United Nations" Oxford University 2016
• 23 Karns MP, "International Organizations: The Politics & Processes of Global Governance" Lynne Rienner 2015
• 24 Dongwon Kim, "Government Roles in Policy Networks against COVID-19: Comparing Two Cases in S. Korea" J-INSTITUTE 5 (5): 14-26, 2020
• 25 Waal AD, "Darfur and the Failure of the Responsibility to Protect" 83 (83): 1039-1054, 2007
• 26 Cho Sung-taek, "Continuity of Jihadist TERRORISM and EU-United States Cooperation in Counterterrorism" J-INSTITUTE 5 (5): 32-39, 2020
• 27 Heywood L, "Analysis of the United Nations-african Union Hybrid Peace Support Operations in Darfur" 8 (8): 119-134, 2019
• 28 남재성, "A Study on Canada’s Response Systems for TERRORISM and Emerging Trends" J-INSTITUTE 5 (5): 13-24, 2020
• 29 Lanz D, "A Movement and Its Discontents" 108 (108): 669-677, 2009
• 30 Tieku TK, "A Curious Case of Hybrid Paternalism : Conceptualizing the Relationship between the UN and AU on Peace and Security" 4 (4): 129-156, 2014
• 31 이상수, "A Case Study of AI DEFENSE Applications in Major Northeast Asian States and Strategies for Building a ROK’s AI-based National Defense System" J-INSTITUTE 6 (6): 1-13, 2021