KCI등재
Business & Human Rights: Optimism and Concern from the U.S. Perspective
저자
크리스티아나 오쵸아 (indiana university)
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2018
작성언어
English
주제어
등재정보
KCI등재
자료형태
학술저널
수록면
3-50(48쪽)
KCI 피인용횟수
0
DOI식별코드
제공처
소장기관
Still, to conclude that the field of business and human rights has failed to change would be to overlook the tremendous data and understanding collected through the innovations of the Global Compact and the work leading to the Guiding Principles, not to mention the B-Corp Movement, the Equator Principles, the proliferate voluntary codes governing nearly every large industry, the creation of NAPs in an ever-larger number of States, the domestic legislation and press-garnering litigation in most of the world’s most important home-state jurisdictions, the advancement of the language of human rights inside of the world’s economic order, and, most importantly, the popular awareness that has come to surround the activities of business actors. These phenomena, viewed cumulatively, significantly bear on the evolving legal landscape for business actors. Indeed, transnational corporations and other business actors now find themselves enmeshed in a fabric of social and economic responsibility that has emerged throughout the past half century. This is the stuff of emerging social norms and, over time, the formation of legitimate law.
더보기The forty-five years from the release of the first report on the subject to the release of the Zero Draft have been accompanied by vibrant scholarly work and debate, as well as a significant jurisprudence, corporate engagement, and civil society discourse. The work is largely recognized as completed, and this moment has been aptly called “the end of the beginning” in the field of business and human rights. It is in this context that this Essay will discuss both the casualties and laments of the past forty-five years, as well as the grounding for optimism at this moment. Though we should not lose sight of the intrinsically global and transnational nature of all issues evoked by discussions on business and human rights, this Essay will focus my reflections on the role of, and perspectives from, the United States In addition, the multiple approaches to governance that have germinated in this field require that the Essay provide only a cursory overview of the current state of play.
During the early years of the United Nations’ exploration into large-scale tortious acts committed in far-off places, transnational businesses operated under fairly generalized legal impunity. This reality was made possible by the combination of the ‘corporate veil’, together with a historically strict application of extraterritoriality, and an absence of international human rights law directly governing businesses.
Since the Kiobel decision, and again since Jesner, a number of authors in the United States have also asked where the claims making up corporate ATS(the Alien Tort Statue) litigation might land, if not in U.S. federal courts. They have looked downward, upward, and sideways and found potential venues in each of those locations. Given the difficulty present in each of the litigation paths currently available, I.e., in US state and federal courts an in the courts of other countries, and in international tribunals, scholars and advocates in the field of business & human rights have turned to the task of entrenching new binding legal obligations on corporations, primarily the duty of corporations to engage in human rights due diligence suggested by the Guiding Principles. They argue for the legalization of a requirement to engage in human rights due diligence mandatory for all businesses, including parent companies.
The United States produced its first NAP(National Action Plan) in December 2016.
The White House National Security Council led and coordinated a multi-stakeholder process that included more than a dozen federal agencies as well as consultations with civil society organizations, businesses, academics, labor unions, indigenous peoples representatives and foreign governments. In addition, the U.S. government maintained an email address for submissions related to the NAP from the public at large, which were collected but never made public. The NAP lists a number of new actions that various agencies within the government will undertake in order to effectuate the goals of the NAP. Despite these positive attributes, the U.S. NAP is not considered best practices and falls short of many other NAPs.
Even as the Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights was drafted, the International Chamber of Commerce stood in clear opposition to the effort. Indeed, the United States’ and ICC’s opposition was among the reasons the Norms failed to gain the support of a sufficient number of states, and failed to be adopted.
Still, to conclude that the field of business and human rights has failed to change would be to overlook the tremendous data and understanding collected through the innovations of the Global Compact and the work leading to the Guiding Principles, not to mention the B-Corp Movement, the Equator Principles, the proliferate voluntary codes governing nearly every large industry, the creation of NAPs in an ever-larger number of States, the domestic...
분석정보
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | KCI등재 |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | KCI등재 |
2016-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) | KCI후보 |
2014-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | KCI후보 |
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.71 | 0.71 | 0 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)