KCI등재
성폭력 피해여성의 경험에 관한 연구 = A Grounded theory Approach on the Experience of sexual abuse Victims
This studies designed to work out a theoretical framework on the experience of sexual abuse from the perspective of grounded theory in an effort to provide more practical and efficient nursing intervention for female victims.
The subcategories identified were "sexual abuse", "threatening", "absent mindness", "embarrassment", "horripilation", "dizziness", "wondrousness", "filthiness", "sexual curiousity", "violence level", "victim's age", "neighbors response", "victims personality", "common experience", "sexual abuse information", "family relations", "level of familiarity", "hiding", "suppression", "self-torture", "self-protection", 'avoidance", "asking aid", "withdrawal", "hatred", "confusion", "dodging", "remmant", and "pursuing".
The 29 subcategories given above were further integrated into 16 categories such as "victimizedness", "being astounded", "filthiness", "degree", "developmental stage", "response pattern", "personality", "rarity", "infromation availability", "family support", "cover-up", "escaping", "informing", "negative internalization", and "positive pursuit of change".
The core categories linked to all the other categories turned out to be "being taken aback" and "filthiness" incorporation the relevant subcategories.
A total of 23 theoretical hypothesis emerged in the process of analyzing data.
1. the grater sexual curiosity, the weaker the senses of being taken aback and filthiness.
2. The weaker sexual curiosity, the stronger the senses of being taken aback and filthness.
3. The stronger the level of violence, The more violent the senses of being taken aback and filthiness.
4. The lower the level of violence, the weaker the senses of being taken aback and filthiness.
5. The younger the victims, the stronger the senses of being taken aback and filthness.
6. The older the victims, The weaker the senses of being taken aback and filthness.
7. 'Escaping' will transpire regardless of the given circumstances.
8. The weaker the senses of being taken aback and filthness, the more probable 'informing' and 'escaping' transpire.
9. The stronger the senses of being taken aback and filthness, the more probable 'informing' and 'escaping' transpire.
10. The more protective the response from 'informing' and 'escaping' transpire around, the more likely the response to 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' will be 'informing' and 'escaping'.
11. The more repelling the response from around, the more likely the response to 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' will be 'covering-up' and 'escaping'.
12. The more open minded the personality of subject, the more likely the response to 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' will be 'covering-up' and 'escaping'.
13. The more closed the personality of subject, the more likely the response to 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' will be 'covering-up' and 'escaping'.
14. The more frequent the experience of sexual abuse, the more likely the response to 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' will be 'covering-up' and 'escaping'.
15. The less frequent the experience of sexual abuse, the more likely the response to 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' will be 'covering-up' and 'escaping'.
16. The more available information concerning sexual abuse, the more likely the response to 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' will be 'covering-up' and 'escaping'.
17. The less available information concerning sexual abuse, the more likely the response to 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' will be 'covering-up' and 'escaping'.
18. The more cohesive the family of the subject, the more likely the response to 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' will be 'covering-up' and 'escaping'.
19. The less cohesive the family of the subject, the more likely the response to 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' will be 'covering-up' and 'escaping'.
20. The more familiar the subject is with the abuser, the more likely the response to 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' will be 'covering-up' and 'escaping'.
21.The less familiar the subjec is with the abuser, the more likely the response to 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' will be 'covering-up' and 'escaping'.
22. The more likely the response to 'being taken aback' and 'filthines' is 'informing' and 'escaping', the more positive changes the subject will pursue.
23. The more likely the response to 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' is 'covering-up' and 'escaping', the more negative changes the subject will pursue.
The following four hypothneses were conformed in the process of data analysis.
1) In case the level of violence is strong but 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' in weak because of strong sexual curiosity and also if information concerning sexual abuse is not readily available and the frequency is low, negative internationalization marked by 'covering-up' and 'escaping' will take place despite the fact the subject is open-minded, the family is cohesive and the abuser is unfamiliar.
2) In case the level of violence is weak but 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' is weak combined wit weak sexual curiosty and also if information concerning sexual abuse is readily available and the response from around is protective and the frequency is high, the subject will pursue positive changes to 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' , further aided by the fact that the subject is open-minded, the family is cohesive and the abuser is unfamilar.
3) In case the level of violence is strong but 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' is strong because of weak sexual curiosity and also if information concerning sexual abuse is reading available and the response from around is readily available and the response from around is protecvice and the frequency is low, the subject will persue positive changes marked by 'informing' and 'escaping' despit the fact that the family cohesion is weak and the abuser is familiar.
4) In case the level of violence is strong but 'being taken aback' and 'filthiness' is strong because of weak sexual curiosity and also if information concerning sexual abuse is not readily available and the response from around is respelling and the frequnecy is low negative internalization like 'covering-up' and 'escaping' will take place, further aggravated by the fact that the subject's personality is closed, family cohension is weak, and subject is familiar.
On the basis of the above finding, it is recommended that nursing intervention should focus on promoting the milieu conductive to the victims pursuing positive changes along with the adequate aids from protection facilities as well as from the people around them.
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)