사회성과연계채권(Social Impact Bond) 운영구조의 유형화 = Characteristics and Types of Social Impact Bond

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Social Impact Bonds(SIBs) has emerged as a promising way to finance proven social services programs, fund what works, and drive government accountability and has increased fast. In this context, this study examines and classifies the structure of SIB focusing key criteria of the main steps through two-step cluster analysis. Analysis results are as follows. First, the main commissioners of SIB are the ministries of the central government. And in terms of the stage of invest, there are usually two or three investors mainly consisting of social finance organizations. Second, in terms of target and age of SIB beneficiaries, it focuses on the adolescent and youth. Third, in the outcome evaluation stage, the results show that in most cases outcome payments are determined by a validation of service provider or government administrative data. However, the rate of payments are based on the comparison of the program beneficiaries to other comparable groups is 23.8%. Finally, The results of two-step cluster analysis are as; `mix of central government and social finance organization`, `multiple agent including private organization`, and `multiple social provider`. Among three types, `multiple agent including private organization` shows the most active participation between agents and the most systematic outcome measurement and management. The results of this study imply that the importance of the method to manage and measure outcome in SIB structure. Moreover, the consist of commissioners or investors is needed to expanded more.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 노희진, "한국형 사회영향채권의 도입방안" 자본시장연구원 6 (6): 5-22, 2014
• 2 장석인, "임팩트투자(Impact Investment)의 사회서비스 활성화 연구: 영국의 사회성과연계채권(SIB)을 중심으로" 한독경상학회 33 (33): 105-128, 2015
• 3 최정인, "영국, 미국, 한국의 사회성과연계채권 운영구조 비교분석" 이화여자대학교 2016
• 4 김규림, "영국 피터버러 사회성과연계채권 1차 평가 결과와 시사점" 자본시장연구원 (37) : 2014
• 5 오민수, "영국 사회성과연동채권(SIB)의 정책사례연구:정책도구적 접근을 중심으로" 한국정책과학학회 17 (17): 1-32, 2013
• 6 문진수, "사회혁신채권의 서울시 사회경제정책 적용 가능성에 대한 검토 연구" 서울연구원 2012
• 7 천정환, "사회혁신채권(SIB)의 교정복지적 의의" 한국교정복지학회 (32) : 25-49, 2014
• 8 최미희, "사회투자를 통해 본 기부문화 활성화의 제도적 과제" 3 (3): 119-154, 2014
• 9 김갑래, "사회성과연계채권 활용방안: 자본시장을 통한 사회문제의 해결" 자본시장연구원 2012
• 10 박정환, "사회서비스 부문에서의 대안적 거버넌스 모형 탐색 - 영국과 미국의 사회성과 연계채권(SIB) 비교분석을 중심으로-" 한국사회복지행정학회 17 (17): 147-187, 2015
• 11 오민수, "사회복지사업에 대한 사회성과연동채권의 적용가능성 모색 연구" 경기복지재단 2012
• 12 이미정, "범죄예방 거버넌스의 새로운 실현방안 : 영국 재범방지 사회혁신채권(SIB) 모델의 개발 사례 및 시사점을 중심으로" 한국형사정책연구원 24 (24): 213-235, 2013
• 13 이재광, "경기도의 사회성과연계채권 도입 방안" 경기개발연구원 2013
• 14 Juvat, "The first German Social Impact Bond: The Augsburg pilot project"
• 15 Gustafsson-W, E., "The Potential and Limitations of Impact Bonds: Lessons from the First Five Years of Experience Worldwide Global Economy and Development Program –" BROOKINGS 2015
• 16 Nicholls, A., "The Peterborough pilot social impact bond" Said Business School, University of Oxford 2013
• 17 Meghan, J., "Social impact bonds: the nest phase of third sector marketization?" 4 (4): 39-55, 2013
• 18 McHugh, N., "Social impact bonds: a wolf in sheep’s clothing?" 21 (21): 247-257, 2013
• 19 Mulgan, G., "Social Impact Investment: the challenge and opportunity of social impact bonds" The Young Foundation 2011
• 20 Ronicle, J., "Social Impact Bonds: The State of Play" 2014
• 21 Emma Tomkinson, "Social Impact Bonds in the UK"
• 22 Hernandez, Maria, "Social Impact Bonds and Community Foundations:Making pay for Success Initiatives Accessible" 2014
• 23 라준영, "Social Impact Bond 관련 모금 및 배분전략에 관한 연구" 사회복지공동모금회 2015
• 24 Centre for Impact Investing, "Social Impact Bond Technical Guide for Service Providers"
• 25 허명회, "SPSS Classification Analysis" 데이터솔루션 2007
• 26 Department for Communities and Local Government, "Qualitative evaluation of the London homelessness social impact bond" Department for Communities and Local Government 2015
• 27 Desley, E., "Phase 2 report from the payment by results Social Impact Bond pilot at HMP Peterborough" Ministry of Justice 2014
• 28 Social Finance, "Peterborough social impact bond reduced reoffending by 8.4%: investors on course for payment in 2016" Social Finance 2014
• 29 Jolliffe, D., "Peterborough Social impact bond: final report on cohort 1 analysis" Ministry of Justice 2014
• 30 Humphries, K., "Not your older brother’s bonds : the use and regulation of social impact bonds in the United States" 76 : 433-452, 2014
• 31 Conexus, "New Home for Single Mothers Opens in Saskatoon"
• 32 Ministry of Justice, "Lessons learned from the social impact bond"
• 33 Desley, E., "Lessons learned from the planning and early implementation of the social impact bond at HMP Peterborough" Rand 2011
• 34 Social Finance, "Investing in Social Outcomes: Development Impact Bonds" Social Finince 2013
• 35 Griffiths, A., "Introduction to social impact bonds and early intervention" Early Intervention Foundation 2014
• 36 Department for Work & Pensions, "Innovation Fund: Programme Specific Provider Guidance Round Two" Department for Work & Pensions 2014
• 37 Department for Work & Pensions, "Innovation Fund: Programme Specific Provider Guidance Round One" Department for Work & Pensions 2014
• 38 Department for Work & Pensions, "Innovation Fund pilots qualitative evaluation: Early implementation findings" Department for Work & Pensions 2014
• 39 Callanan, L., "From potential to action: Bringing social impact bonds to the us" McKinsey on Society 2012
• 40 McKinsey&Company, "From Potential to Action: bringing social impact bonds to the us" McKinsey&Company 2012
• 41 Mowat Centre, "From Investment to Impact: The NFP Experience with Social Impact Bonds" University of Toronto 2014
• 42 Hughes, "Foundations for Social Impact Bonds - How and Why Philanthropy is Catalyzing the Development of a New Market"
• 43 Rudd, T., "Financing program evidence-based program: early lessons from the New York City social impact bond" MDRC 2013
• 44 Department for Communities and Local Government, "Fair Chance Fund" Department for Communities and Local Government 2014
• 45 KPMG, "Evaluation of the Joint Development Phase of the NSW Social Benefit Bonds Trial"
• 46 Jackson, E., "Evaluating social impact bonds : questions, challenges, innovations, and possibilities in measuring outcomes in impact investing" 44 (44): 608-616, 2013
• 47 Soule, A, "DWP Commissioning: Payment by Results and social investment" Department for Work & Pensions 2013
• 48 Department for Work & Pensions, "DWP Commissioning Strategy 2013" Department for Work & Pensions 2013
• 49 Big Lottery Fund, "Commissioning Better Outcomes Project Summaries" Big Lottery Fund 2015
• 50 Shi, J., "An analysis of social impact bond financing: attribution and deadweight" Stern School of Business New York 2014