빅데이터(Big Data) 환경과 프라이버시의 보호 = A Study on Big Data Circumstance and Privacy Protection

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The amount of data in our world has been exploding. Big data is now part of every sector and function of the global economy. The unrestricted correction, combination and use of personal data is at risk for development into the big brother. Big Data provide positive aspects such as efficiency, convenience and new utility creation. However Big Data bring about various new problem such as infringement on privacy etc.. Big Data is highly likely to infringe on privacy and consumer rights while damaging fair competition and intensifying the concentration of economic power. There have been international efforts to solve these problems and the EU’s Proposed General Data Protection Regulation & the EU's 1995 Data Protection Directive(95/46/EC) and the Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights of US are noticiable. Justice Brandeis taught us that privacy is the “right to be let alone,” but we also already know that privacy is about much more than just solitude or secrecy.
In this article, we examine why American and EU privacy law split part in the 21th century and analyze the consequences of this divergence on both sides of the Atlantic. And the Personal Information Protection Act(hereinafter "PIPA") including the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc.(hereinafter "the Network Act") of Korea are necessary to consider whether to lack "adequate" privacy protections.
In conclusion, the Korean PIPA including the Korean Network Act and so on must be reformed or revised in order to collect use data for historical, statistical or scientic purpuses and introduce ‘Privacy by Design’, ‘Right to be forgotten’ etc. including through a Do Not Track mechanism for the harmonization of use data with privacy protection in big data environments. Especially we need to perform ‘Privacy by Design’ that is an privacy focused design examining possibility of privacy invasion. Lastly, the Korean PIPA including the Korean Network Act should give consumers the ability to make decisions about their own personal data at a relevant time and context. And the Korean PIPA including the Korean Network Act should offer to us a dynamic model of how to offer strong privacy protection and enable ongoing innovation in new information technologies.
Nowadays we live in a world in which we share personal information more freely than in the past. And then, must we reject the conclusion that privacy is an outmoded value? The answer to that question is no. Because we are emphasizing that we need not to lack "adequate" privacy protections now more than ever.

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 윤미영, "주요국의 빅데이터 추진전략 분석 및 시사점" 과학기술정책연구원 23 (23): 2013
• 2 박정훈, "잊혀질 권리와 표현의 자유, 그리고 정보프라이버시" 한국비교공법학회 14 (14): 569-602, 2013
• 3 정하명, "스마트폰의 위치정보와 프라이버시보호 - 미국에서의 논의를 중심으로 -" 한국비교공법학회 14 (14): 61-85, 2013
• 4 박진서, "새로운 기술패러다임으로서 빅데이터: 쟁점과 과제" 과학기술정책연구원 23 (23): 2013
• 5 헌법재판소, "사이버 공간상의 표현의 자유와 그 규제에 관한 연구" 13 : 2002
• 6 박경신, "사생활의 비밀의 절차적 보호규범으로서의 개인정보보호법리 ― 개인정보보호법 및 위치정보보호법의 해석 및 적용의 헌법적 한계 ―" 한국공법학회 40 (40): 129-162, 2011
• 7 오길영, "빅데이터 환경과 개인정보의 보호방안-정보주체의 관점에서 바라본 비판적 검토를 중심으로-" 2013
• 8 장병열, "빅데이터 기반 융합 서비스 창출 주요 정책 및 시사점" 과학기술정책연구원 23 (23): 2013
• 9 김용훈, "국제적 수준에서의 기본권의 제한과 보호* - 프라이버시권을 중심으로 -" 한양법학회 24 (24): 27-58, 2013
• 10 최혜선, "개인정보보호의 신경향 －프라이버시 중심 디자인(Privacy by Design)을 중심으로－" 법학연구소 (24) : 305-340, 2013
• 11 이창범, "개인정보보호법제 관점에서 본 빅데이터의 활용과 보호 방안" 법학연구소 37 (37): 509-559, 2013
• 12 행정안전부, "개인정보 보호법령 및 지침 ․ 고시 해설"
• 13 Lior Jacob Strahilevitz, "Toward a Positive Theory of Privacy Law" 126 : 2010-, 2013
• 14 James Q. Whitman, "The Two Western Cultures of Privacy: Dignity versus Liberty" 113 : 1151-, 2004
• 15 Sofia Marques da Silva, "The TFTP Agreement: A Legal and Contextual Analysis" 2012
• 16 Jeffrey Rosen, "The Right to Be Forgotten" 64 : 88-, 2012
• 17 Paul M. Schwartz, "The EU-U.S. Privacy Collision: A Turn to Institutions and Procedures" 126 : 1966-, 2013
• 18 Jeffrey Rosen, "The Deciders: The Future of Privacy and Free Speech in the Age of Facebook and Google" 80 : 1525-, 2012
• 19 Sanford Levinson, "Structuring Intimacy: Some Reflections on the Fact That the Law. Generally Does Not Protect Us against Unwanted Gazes" 89 : 2073-, 2001
• 20 Neil M. Richards, "Privacy's Other Path: Recovering the Law of Confidentiality" 96 : 123-, 2007
• 21 McKinsey Global Institute, "Gig Data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity"
• 22 Jeroen van Rest, "Daniel Boonstra, Maarten Everts, Martin van Rijn, Ron van Paassen, Designing privacy-by-design"
• 23 Seda Gürses, "Carmela Troncoso, and Claudia Diaz, Engineering Privacy by Design"
• 24 Benjamin E. Bratman, "Brandeis and Warren's The Right to Privacy and the Birth of the Right to Privacy" 69 : 623-, 2002
• 25 Cavoukian, Ann, "7 Foundational Principles of Privacy by Design, Information and Privacy Commissioner/Ontario"