KCI등재후보
관상동맥 석회화 침착 정량화 CT검사를 위한 제조사별 소프트웨어의 재현성 평가 = Comparison Among the Software Reproducibilities for Coronary Arteries Calcification Scoring
저자
변정인(Joog In Byun) ; 남윤철(Yoon Chol Nam) ; 조원홍(Won Hong Cho) ; 김문찬(Moon Chan Kim)
발행기관
학술지명
대한CT영상기술학회지(Journal of Korean society of cumputed tomographic technology)
권호사항
발행연도
2006
작성언어
-주제어
KDC
510
등재정보
KCI등재후보
자료형태
학술저널
발행기관 URL
수록면
109-116(8쪽)
제공처
Purpose
The main purpose of coronary calcification quantifiable test is to prognose the progress of arteriosclerosis, to screen the group and to prevent exacerbation. Like, the test is performed by periodic pursuit test. However, the numerical value outputted newly is difficult to compare with the former value, in case a new tomography was replaced or a patientwas transferred to another hospital. It is because test methods and the softwares for quantifiable test are not standardized yet. Hereupon, this study was performed on purpose to compare the calcification values, outputted by a company’s, with other companies’.
Materials and Methods
The 30cases, sampled 10cases respectively from 3companies, were subjected to this study. Likewise, LightSpeed 16 and Advantage workstation 4.1(GE), Brilliance 40 and Extended Brilliance Workspace 2.0(Philips) and Somatom Sensation 16 and Wizard Workstation 3D Card(VB10B Siemens) were subjected to this study. In order that clear images can be secured, GE’s testers were operated under the condition of 0.5 rotation time, 120kVp and 350mA, through axial prospective gating. In case of Philips’ products, the exposure condition was composed of 0.42 rotation time, 120kVp and 196mAs(effective mAs), through axial prospective gating. In case of Siemens’, the condition was composed of 0.42 rotation time, 120kVp and 150mAs (effectivemAs), through helical retroprospective gating. While 25cm DFOV-2.5mm tomographic images were outputted in GE’s and Philips’, 18m DFOV-3mm tomographic images were outputted in Siemens’. AJ-130 and AJ volume were calculated through analyzing the images, outputted from a company’s product, on 3companies’, and the numerical difference among the companies were ascertained through the values.
Results
1. The 10 data outputted from ‘P’ Company was respectively analyzed on the softwares of P, S and G Company respectively. As a result of ascertaining the numerical difference between P and S Company, the variation of AJ-130 was from 0 to 16.9%, based on P Company. On this occasion, 2 data were correctly tallied with each other, and 0.1~5% and 15.1~20% were one of each. AJ volume indicated the variation between 8 and 119%, and 0.1~50%, 50.1~100% and 100.1~150% were 4, 3 and 3 cases respectively. Likewise, the numericaldifference between P and G Company was ascertained on the basis of P Company. As a result, the variation was from 0.3 to 20.9% in case of P Company; 0.1~5%, 5.1~10%, 10.1~15% were 1, 1 and 2 cases respectively. In case of AJ volume, the variation indicated the range between 0.2 and 169.8%. Enumerating respective variations, 0.1~50% were 4 cases, 50.1~100% were 3 cases, 100.1~150% was 1 case and 150.1~200% were 2 cases.
2. The 10 data outputted from ‘S’ Company were respectivelyanalyzed on the softwares of P, S and G Company. In consequence, AJ-130 indicated the variation between 0 and 3.5%, based on S Company, and the cases where numerical value was correctly tallied were 3 parts; the remnant 7 cases showed the variation from0.1 to 5%. AJ volume indicated the variation between 1.9 and 10.5%, and 0.1~5%, 5.1~10% and 10.1~15% were 7, 1 and 1 case respectively. In the numerical difference between S and G Company, AJ-130 showed the variation from 0 to 16.2%, based on S Company. One case were correctly tallied, and 0.1~5%, 10.1~15% and 15.1~20% were 7, 1 and 1 case respectively. In case of AJ volume, the variation was from 0.1 to 22.8% and 0.1~5%, 5.1~10% and 20.1~25% were 5, 4 and 1 case of each.
3. The 10 data outputted from ‘G’ Company were respectively analyzed on the softwaresof G and P Company. In consequence of ascertaining the numerical difference between G and P Company, AJ-130 indicated the variation range from 0.1 to 11.8%, based on G Company, and 0.1~5%, 5.1~10% and 10.1~15% were 7, 2 and 1 case respectively. In case of AJ volume, 10 differences were observed between 0.1 and 3.3%.
Conclusion
In case coronary calcification was analyze
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)