윤달의 민속심리와 주술ㆍ종교적 특성 = 길흉관념의 형성과 전개를 중심으로

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

An intercalary month is a scientific production from the calendar, but the methodology of recognizing this in the folk society has been progressed by putting roots down deep in religion. And many branches of folk customs and discussions done in the intercalary month reveals the folk psychology of dealing with unusual time.
There are four types coexisting in pairs but which are mutually contradictory in intercalary month folk customs. These are ‘doing’, ‘not doing’ based on important everyday affairs, and ‘praying for good fortune’, ‘blocking misfortune’. Sometimes, certain things are actively done having no connection with the characteristics of that everyday affair, based on the recognition of ‘doing in the intercalary month since there is no trouble’ even in the type of not doing an important affair. It is found that the same affair is applied oppositely by doing it or not doing it from dividing auspicious events and misfortune contemporarily.
Complicated recognitions toward the intercalated month is originally being progressed based on the notion of fortune. Not only the recognition toward a transcendental being related to unusual time but also an astronomic feature as ‘the month with no lucky & unlucky’ rhat the intercalated month belongs to Mujungweol(month without a middle) based on the calendar is importantly applied in the formation of the fortune notion. The intercalated month fundamentally with no fortune being developed into a fortunate month and misfortunate month- for example, an original interpretation that the month becomes fortunate from having no misfortune and misfortunate from having no fortune, is found to be expressed as folk culture through discussion. Moreover, as the characteristics of ‘things to do’ depending on the recognition on ‘fortunate, misfortunate month’ are regulated, the meaning of ‘month’ is made by dividing ‘fortunate, misfortunate affairs’. New discussions and interpretations on the intercalated month are continuously produced.
Especially, complex recognitions on the intercalated month and the notion on fortune reveals an aspect closer to an ideological development rather than a time development. Although the trend of the era is shown to some level, concerned discussions are handed down and formed in layers as complicated branches of thoughts always coexist due to the original characteristics of the intercalated month.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 윤달역법의 보편성과 윤달문화의 특수성
• Ⅱ. 윤달민속의 상호대립적인 네 유형
• Ⅲ. 윤달 길흉관념 형성의 중층적 요인
• Ⅳ. 윤달 길흉관념의 전개양상
• Ⅴ. 마치는 말
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

• 1 이은성, "曆法의 原理分析" 정음사 1985
• 2 국립민속박물관, "한국세시풍속사전:겨울편"
• 3 한국정신문화연구원, "한국민족문화대백과사전"
• 4 이창익, "조선후기 역서의 우주론적 복합성에 대한 연구:역법과 역주의 관계를 중심으로" 서울대학교 2004
• 5 구미래, "윤달 ‘세절밟기’의 민속적 전개와 제의적 특성" 실천민속학회 (10) : 2007
• 6 김명자, "세시풍속을 통해 본 윤달의 의미" 韓國大學博物館協會 49 : 1996
• 7 국립문화재연구소, "세시풍속(경기도ㆍ강원도ㆍ충청북도ㆍ충청남도ㆍ전라북도ㆍ전라남도ㆍ경상북도ㆍ경상남도ㆍ제주도 편)"
• 8 임동권, "결혼과 윤달(閏月)" 월간불교사 (611) : 2006
• 9 김의숙, "강원전통문화총서:민속" 국학자료원 1997
• 10 "高麗史節要"
• 11 "高麗史"
• 12 金泰坤, "韓國民間信仰硏究" 集文堂 1983
• 13 謝秀梅, "韓中 歲時風俗의 比較硏究:鬼神信仰을 中心으로" 成均館大學校 1996
• 14 "荊楚歲時記"
• 15 宗?, "荊楚歲時記" 집문당 1996
• 16 "白湖全書"
• 17 張正龍, "江原道史:傳統文化編" 江原道史編纂委員會 1995
• 18 "東國歲時記"
• 19 玄正晙, "朝鮮王朝의 曆" 국회사무처 182 : 1981
• 20 "朝鮮王朝實錄"
• 21 朝鮮總督府, "朝鮮の年中行事"
• 22 "春秋穀梁傳"
• 23 "宋子大全"
• 24 전용훈, "17～18세기 서양과학의 도입과 갈등:時憲曆 施行과 節氣配置法에 대한 논란을 중심으로" 延世大學校 國學硏究院 117 : 2002