KCI등재
업무상배임죄에 있어서 경영판단의 원칙 = Business judgment rule on the crime of trust breach in business
저자
정운용 (에틱스아카데미 윤리경영연구소)
발행기관
학술지명
권호사항
발행연도
2009
작성언어
Korean
주제어
등재정보
KCI등재
자료형태
학술저널
발행기관 URL
수록면
311-343(33쪽)
KCI 피인용횟수
4
제공처
In these days, the business judgment rule is dealt importantly in the criminal law. The reason is that if the criminal law intervenes excessively in the area of the corporate management, the manager's judgment and creative challenge mind are ignored and restrained. So it is possible to criticize that the result of the excessive intervenes of the criminal law leads to the shrinking of the corporate activities and brings the damage to the national economy finally.
There is a confrontation of opinions whether the business judgment rule can be adopted as the principle of the limitation of the intervention of the criminal law in the control of the corporate crime, especially as the criminal law principle that limits the application of the crime of trust breach in business.
In principle, the corporate's management should be based on the management's autonomy and initiative. So the corporate manager's free business judgment must be respected. Especially, the adventurous transaction is often followed in management, so the corporate manager must not be called to account of the criminal law for the only reason of the management result even if the injury happened in the course of the management of the company. The reason is that this is violated to the principle of the responsibility of the criminal law.
However, the business judgment is not located outside area in the law even if it is the high degree management. Especially, because other sanctions except the criminal law is not effective in actually on the regulation of the corporate crime, the need for the control of the criminal law is called when the seriousness of the social damage that the corporate crime produces is considered.
Today, because the social status of the enterprise is huge, the enterprise's influence is stronger than ever before. So the enterprise activity is no more only a individual's problem. It produces the social and public responsibility. Therefore, it is not unreasonable that impose the corporate social responsibility on the company.
The practice of the corporate social responsibility is taken for granted as the common social principle that the corporate should observe now. Therefore, it came to the circumstance that enterprises accept the corporate social responsibility in some degree as rightful thing.
It is regrettable that the discussion on the corporate crime has not considered the effective control plan on the corporate crime through the debate that understands essential characters of enterprise and the deep concern of the damage by the corporate crime as yet.
Preferably, it may be leaned on the part of the theory of the criminal law. However, it may be the reasonable control plan what needs really now to settle the problem of the corporate crime. The reason is that through the plan the effort to promote the social trust and to recover the national sense of common bonds can be enlarged.
On today, the control circumstance about the corporate crime is not so enough. In the situation, it is not always appreciated to apply the business judgment rule so easily only for the reason of the called peculiar management area of enterprise. Because it is undesirable to except the malpractice of the corporate like the crime of trust breach in business that the management commits in the control of the criminal law only for the reason. Nevertheless I can not agree to exclude the application of the business judgment rule in the problem of the crime of trust breach in business unconditionally without the reasonable reason. Because the business operations such the enterprise's initiative and free economic activities within the frame of market economy principle must be secured in principle. The reason is that it can contribute to enterprise's preservation and strengthening and the development of national economy through this.
For the reason, the enterprise's autonomy and initiative must be respected also in the analysis of the crime of t...
In these days, the business judgment rule is dealt importantly in the criminal law. The reason is that if the criminal law intervenes excessively in the area of the corporate management, the manager's judgment and creative challenge mind are ignored and restrained. So it is possible to criticize that the result of the excessive intervenes of the criminal law leads to the shrinking of the corporate activities and brings the damage to the national economy finally.
There is a confrontation of opinions whether the business judgment rule can be adopted as the principle of the limitation of the intervention of the criminal law in the control of the corporate crime, especially as the criminal law principle that limits the application of the crime of trust breach in business.
In principle, the corporate's management should be based on the management's autonomy and initiative. So the corporate manager's free business judgment must be respected. Especially, the adventurous transaction is often followed in management, so the corporate manager must not be called to account of the criminal law for the only reason of the management result even if the injury happened in the course of the management of the company. The reason is that this is violated to the principle of the responsibility of the criminal law.
However, the business judgment is not located outside area in the law even if it is the high degree management. Especially, because other sanctions except the criminal law is not effective in actually on the regulation of the corporate crime, the need for the control of the criminal law is called when the seriousness of the social damage that the corporate crime produces is considered.
Today, because the social status of the enterprise is huge, the enterprise's influence is stronger than ever before. So the enterprise activity is no more only a individual's problem. It produces the social and public responsibility. Therefore, it is not unreasonable that impose the corporate social responsibility on the company.
The practice of the corporate social responsibility is taken for granted as the common social principle that the corporate should observe now. Therefore, it came to the circumstance that enterprises accept the corporate social responsibility in some degree as rightful thing.
It is regrettable that the discussion on the corporate crime has not considered the effective control plan on the corporate crime through the debate that understands essential characters of enterprise and the deep concern of the damage by the corporate crime as yet.
Preferably, it may be leaned on the part of the theory of the criminal law. However, it may be the reasonable control plan what needs really now to settle the problem of the corporate crime. The reason is that through the plan the effort to promote the social trust and to recover the national sense of common bonds can be enlarged.
On today, the control circumstance about the corporate crime is not so enough. In the situation, it is not always appreciated to apply the business judgment rule so easily only for the reason of the called peculiar management area of enterprise. Because it is undesirable to except the malpractice of the corporate like the crime of trust breach in business that the management commits in the control of the criminal law only for the reason. Nevertheless I can not agree to exclude the application of the business judgment rule in the problem of the crime of trust breach in business unconditionally without the reasonable reason. Because the business operations such the enterprise's initiative and free economic activities within the frame of market economy principle must be secured in principle. The reason is that it can contribute to enterprise's preservation and strengthening and the development of national economy through this.
For the reason, the enterprise's autonomy and initiative must be respected also in the analysis of the ...
분석정보
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2027 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2021-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | KCI등재 |
2018-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | KCI등재 |
2017-12-01 | 평가 | 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) | KCI후보 |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | KCI등재 |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | KCI등재 |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | KCI등재 |
2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | KCI후보 |
2004-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | KCI후보 |
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.67 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.59 | 0.53 | 0.667 | 0.39 |
서지정보 내보내기(Export)
닫기소장기관 정보
닫기권호소장정보
닫기오류접수
닫기오류 접수 확인
닫기음성서비스 신청
닫기음성서비스 신청 확인
닫기이용약관
닫기학술연구정보서비스 이용약관 (2017년 1월 1일 ~ 현재 적용)
학술연구정보서비스(이하 RISS)는 정보주체의 자유와 권리 보호를 위해 「개인정보 보호법」 및 관계 법령이 정한 바를 준수하여, 적법하게 개인정보를 처리하고 안전하게 관리하고 있습니다. 이에 「개인정보 보호법」 제30조에 따라 정보주체에게 개인정보 처리에 관한 절차 및 기준을 안내하고, 이와 관련한 고충을 신속하고 원활하게 처리할 수 있도록 하기 위하여 다음과 같이 개인정보 처리방침을 수립·공개합니다.
주요 개인정보 처리 표시(라벨링)
목 차
3년
또는 회원탈퇴시까지5년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한3년
(「전자상거래 등에서의 소비자보호에 관한2년
이상(개인정보보호위원회 : 개인정보의 안전성 확보조치 기준)개인정보파일의 명칭 | 운영근거 / 처리목적 | 개인정보파일에 기록되는 개인정보의 항목 | 보유기간 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
학술연구정보서비스 이용자 가입정보 파일 | 한국교육학술정보원법 | 필수 | ID, 비밀번호, 성명, 생년월일, 신분(직업구분), 이메일, 소속분야, 웹진메일 수신동의 여부 | 3년 또는 탈퇴시 |
선택 | 소속기관명, 소속도서관명, 학과/부서명, 학번/직원번호, 휴대전화, 주소 |
구분 | 담당자 | 연락처 |
---|---|---|
KERIS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 정보보호본부 김태우 | - 이메일 : lsy@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0439 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0195 |
KERIS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 개인정보보호부 이상엽 | |
RISS 개인정보 보호책임자 | 대학학술본부 장금연 | - 이메일 : giltizen@keris.or.kr - 전화번호 : 053-714-0149 - 팩스번호 : 053-714-0194 |
RISS 개인정보 보호담당자 | 학술진흥부 길원진 |
자동로그아웃 안내
닫기인증오류 안내
닫기귀하께서는 휴면계정 전환 후 1년동안 회원정보 수집 및 이용에 대한
재동의를 하지 않으신 관계로 개인정보가 삭제되었습니다.
(참조 : RISS 이용약관 및 개인정보처리방침)
신규회원으로 가입하여 이용 부탁 드리며, 추가 문의는 고객센터로 연락 바랍니다.
- 기존 아이디 재사용 불가
휴면계정 안내
RISS는 [표준개인정보 보호지침]에 따라 2년을 주기로 개인정보 수집·이용에 관하여 (재)동의를 받고 있으며, (재)동의를 하지 않을 경우, 휴면계정으로 전환됩니다.
(※ 휴면계정은 원문이용 및 복사/대출 서비스를 이용할 수 없습니다.)
휴면계정으로 전환된 후 1년간 회원정보 수집·이용에 대한 재동의를 하지 않을 경우, RISS에서 자동탈퇴 및 개인정보가 삭제처리 됩니다.
고객센터 1599-3122
ARS번호+1번(회원가입 및 정보수정)